Some additional information.
From Dr. Dean Edell, article on Why Did The Adjustment Make My Back Worse?:
*There really is no such thing as your spine being out of alignment.
We’ve taken spines out of dead people, put them on drill presses and tried to misalign vertebrae and you really can’t. It’s a 100-year-old theory that diseases are caused by subluxations. There is no such thing as a subluxation causing disease. If you have a chiropractor that is telling you that you have diseases based on pinched nerves and subluxations, I would just say prove it. *
Will A Chiropractor Help Me Avoid Sinus Surgery?:
*a chiropractic has no business treating sinus problems.
A modern, ethical chiropractor decries the bad apples in the profession who hold fast to the 19th century idea that all diseases are caused by pinched nerves. What a bunch of bull. *
Rather than send you to another link, let me quote myself when I discussed a Money magazine article on chiropractors back in 1999:
*The author discussed the studies showing that physical therapy and a combination of rest and pain medicine plus exercise can be as effective at treating back pain – at lower cost. The author also points out that there is “no conclusive clinical evidence that chiropractic helps chronic back pain,” which is one reason many people go to chiropractors.
Most important is the author’s dividing up of chiropractors into two groups. She notes that “Roughly 80% of chiropractors believe that spinal misalignment is a significant cause of disease,” and adds, “If yours endorses chiropractic’s use for nonmusculoskeletal problems, such as asthma (for which studies show it is not useful), or encourages you to think of him or her as a primary-care provider, you may want to choose someone else.” She also warns consumers away from chiropractors who want to prescribe herbs or homeopathic remedies.
The author also talks about “scientifically oriented chiropractors,” who treat only musculoskeletal conditions (she even gives a phone number and website to find these “good” types).
The article ends on a good note, explaining that medical experts (except most chiropractors, of course) do not recommend routine chiropractic visits as a way to prevent future problems. This means people should not have standing appointments with a chiropractor, and I hope that a few of the many people who have such scheduled visits read this article and think about whether that type of chiropractic is all it’s cracked up to be.*
Some of the studies mentioned include two studies on chiropractic from the New England Journal of Medicine(10/8/98). One looked at non-traditional use of chiropractic to treat asthma in children. It studied 80 kids with mild to moderate asthma, all of whom were seen by 11 chiropractors to get either standard chiropractic treatment or fake manipulations. After four months, both groups got slightly better, but there was no difference between them (indicating the probability of a placebo effect).
The second study focused more on the standard claims of chiropractic and looked at people with lower back pain. More than 320 people were tested, and it was found that while physical therapy and chiropractic were both mildly beneficial compared to care just under a family doctor, patients did only marginally better than those receiving a $1 booklet on backaches!
To close, let me say that the thought of taking a child to a chiropractor scares the hell out of me. Even if you believe in all the subluxation crap, kids’ spines are still so flexible there is no way they could even need manipulation. And, because their bones are flexible, you can actually do them serious damage with all this manipulation. I recall Dateline NBC or a similar TV newsmagazine doing an investigation into this, and thought I had written it up at some point, but can’t find it now.