It’s probably worth your while taking up that argument with somebody who actually made that argument.
But that person isn’t me.
OTOH, when you look – again – at those who believe the 2020 election was stolen from Trump by the Democrats …
There’s value in understanding who clings tightly to outright fabrications, why they are susceptible to clinging to them, and where they encountered them initially and/or where they are powerfully reinforced.
I’d also like to suggest – tagging @kenobi_65 just for grins – that nobody ever wants to admit that they’re influenced by advertising, propaganda, or marketing. And yet the annual advertising expenditures in the US are around $350-400BN.
Why, then?
I’m just going to graciously skip over your equating my view of the actual contemporary US misinformation data with the actions of the Third Reich, but please don’t make the mistake of assuming that I didn’t notice. I did 
ETA: here’s a link to the (11pp PDF) Fairleigh Dickinson study that I referenced above:
What you know depends on what you watch: Current events knowledge across popular news sources
You shouldn’t have less factual knowledge by watching a given network than you would have if you watched nothing at all. We should all be able to agree on at least that, I would think.