# We should give Israel to the Mormons

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [November 19, 2012, 1:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458 "2012-11-19T01:02:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 18\
**Page:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheshire\_Human](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/5f8ce5/32.png) [@Cheshire\_Human](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheshire_Human)\
**Post date:** [November 27, 2012, 9:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458/161 "2012-11-27T21:17:18Z")

</div>

> [@Monty](#):
>
> I’d question the veracity of the claim that the Conch Republic’s passports have been accepted by even one government. A mistake made by a border guard does not constitute diplomatic recognition of a state. But I’m sure you already know that.

Yes, I know that. I was pointing to it as an example that ‘what makes a state a state’ is ambiguous in the real world. It’s not something you can point to and say ‘that one is, but this one isn’t.’ It’s more like ‘that one definitely is, this one definitely isn’t, but the one over there we’re not too sure about.’

> [@Monty](#):
>
> p.s. AFAIK, the Conch Republic passports are merely souvenirs. In other words, they’re issued as a joke.

And I’m aware of that, too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![truthSeeker2](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/7cd45c/32.png) [@truthSeeker2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/truthSeeker2)\
**Post date:** [November 28, 2012, 5:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458/162 "2012-11-28T17:16:56Z")

</div>

> [@Malthus](#):
>
> Perhaps. But several important modern nations were “created” or had their borders defined by violence in exactly the same era as Israel - and no-one is suggesting that they be reformatted.
> 
> Israel was created by violence in 1948. In the previous year, so was India and Pakistan - in fact the “partition” of the British Empire in India resulted in a human disaster and population displacement that far dwarfs tiny Israel.
> 
> Pakistan and India both disputed the region of Kashmir ever since and fought a territorial war over it in 1965 (roughly analogous to Israel fighting one in 1967).  
> \*\*  
> In 1971, India fought and won a decisive victory over Pakistan and the entire terrirory of what had been “East Pakistan” was ceded by force and made the new state of “Bangladesh”. Again, roughtly at the same time as an Arab-Israeli war (1973).  
> \*\*  
> This, despite the “consensus”.
> 
> There are numerous other cases, but the Indian subcontent example is instructive because (a) the wars happened at nearly exactly the same time as Arab-Israeli wars; and (b) the results were significantly more important in terms of numbers of people and amount of territory affected.
> 
> As far as I know, there is no significant movement to demand that all of these territorial arrangements are illegitimate and that they be reversed because of that.
> 
> Clearly, force is still a significant factor - as it always has been - in the creation and identity of states.

There is no Indian settlements in Bangladesh.  
The similarity between Israel situation and India situation is that both suffer from Islamic terrorism originating from beyond their borders. India can learn a lot from Israel wrt their counter terrorism policies imo though we are dealing with a nuclear armed state(pakistan) which is much bigger and more dangerous than gaza.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gamerunknown](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/6bbea6/32.png) [@gamerunknown](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gamerunknown)\
**Post date:** [November 28, 2012, 8:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458/163 "2012-11-28T20:24:46Z")

</div>

> [@Monty](#):
>
> How about “consequence of war”?

The states which had controlled those territories at the time and were at war with Israel ceded rule over them.

> [@](#):
>
> The partition plan for Palestine was a UN initiative, wasn’t it?

You’re right, sorry. The Arab states dissented at the time, unlike the Muslim League in India.

> [@](#):
>
> How about “defensive war”?

How would you define that? Is it a category with international recognition?

> [@brazil84](#):
>
> 1. Before 1967, what exactly were the Arabs doing to “protect their borders”?

I have no idea what Egypt or Jordan were doing. In that period, they were more hostile to Palestinian autonomy than Israel was.

> [@](#):
>
> 1. Exactly what borders are Hamas trying to protect with their rocket attacks on Israel?

Presumably those attacks are in response to the blockade. I don’t approve of them one bit.

> [@](#):
>
> 1. Do you believe Hamas when it states its goal is to destroy Israel? Or do you think Hamas is lying and it actually just wants to protect borders?

I think that’s where I disagree with Norman Finkelstein. He says nobody pays attention to the Constitution of Hamas, but I think it’s important. I have a feeling they’re responsible for the destruction of the Crazy Water Park as well. I certainly think that anti-Jewish bigotry informs some of their actions, which is inexcusable (I emailed Norm on this issue and he brushed it off). However, I’d think that this would play an even larger role in dissension in the creation of India and Pakistan, given that polytheists (which the Hindu majority would qualify as) were held in lower regard than “People of the Book” in the Quran.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![brazil84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/8491ac/32.png) [@brazil84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/brazil84)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2012, 9:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458/164 "2012-11-30T09:12:10Z")

</div>

> [@gamerunknown](#):
>
> I have no idea what Egypt or Jordan were doing.
> 
> . . .
> 
> Presumably

So if your belief that the Arabs are simply “protecting their borders” is not based on facts, what is it based on? Prejudice against Jewish people? Or something else?

> [@](#):
>
> I think that’s where I disagree with Norman Finkelstein.

Umm, does that mean yes or no?

Let me ask you this: Do you have any evidence at all that the Arabs are simply trying to “protect their borders”? (Note: Your desire to see Israel as the bad guy in the conflict does not count as evidence.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gamerunknown](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/6bbea6/32.png) [@gamerunknown](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gamerunknown)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2012, 10:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458/165 "2012-12-01T22:55:15Z")

</div>

> [@brazil84](#):
>
> So if your belief that the Arabs are simply “protecting their borders” is not based on facts, what is it based on? Prejudice against Jewish people? Or something else?

That awesome moment when one is accused of prejudice by _brazil84_. Your own contorted interpretation is evidence only of your jaundiced, Platonic thinking. I responded to your post about “assuming two groups can’t get along” under the assumption we were discussing Israel vs. Palestine, but evidently you view all Arabs as a homogenous group with no discernible differences between individuals within.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![brazil84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/8491ac/32.png) [@brazil84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/brazil84)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2012, 9:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458/166 "2012-12-02T09:18:06Z")

</div>

> [@gamerunknown](#):
>
> That awesome moment when one is accused of prejudice by _brazil84_.

It wasn’t quite an accusation, but I am trying to figure out why you assert with absolutely no evidence that the Arabs are simply trying to “protect their borders.” You aren’t even able to specify what borders are being protected. And you even admit ignorance of the underlying facts.

The evidence is overwhelming that the Arabs are NOT simply trying to “protect their borders,” and yet you will not concede that you are wrong.

What could be going on in your brain that you have things so completely, 180 degrees wrong?

> [@](#):
>
> I responded to your post about “assuming two groups can’t get along” under the assumption we were discussing Israel vs. Palestine,

I don’t know what you mean by “Palestine.” When did “Palestine” come into existence? What are the exact borders of “Palestine”? And what exactly is being done to “protect the borders” of “Palestine”?

> [@](#):
>
> but evidently you view all Arabs as a homogenous group with no discernible differences between individuals within.

:shrug: There is general consensus among the Arabs that (1) there should not be Jewish Israel; and (2) eliminating Jewish Israel is more important than establishing an (additional) Arab state.

Anyway, I really would like an answer to my questions so that I can understand your position:

(1) When did “Palestine” come into existence?

(2) What are the exact borders of “Palestine”?

(3) Exactly what is being done to “protect the borders” of “Palestine”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gamerunknown](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/6bbea6/32.png) [@gamerunknown](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gamerunknown)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2012, 10:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458/167 "2012-12-02T10:04:51Z")

</div>

> [@brazil84](#):
>
> It wasn’t quite an accusation, but I am trying to figure out why you assert with absolutely no evidence that the Arabs are simply trying to “protect their borders.”

I’m not quite sure why I expected anything but mendacity from you, but here’s what I said:

> [@gamerunknown](#):
>
> In which case, I don’t think Palestine can be claimed to be an aggressor given it is acting to protect its borders.

> [@](#):
>
> I don’t know what you mean by “Palestine.” When did “Palestine” come into existence? What are the exact borders of “Palestine”? And what exactly is being done to “protect the borders” of “Palestine”?

[Here, this ought to help](http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=43640&Cr=palestin&Cr1=#.ULsniWeZjTo)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![brazil84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/8491ac/32.png) [@brazil84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/brazil84)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2012, 10:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458/168 "2012-12-02T10:26:24Z")

</div>

> [@gamerunknown](#):
>
> I’m not quite sure why I expected anything but mendacity from you, but here’s what I said:

Oh really, so why did you mention the Golan Heights? Is that also part of “Palestine” as you see it?

> [@](#):
>
> Here, this ought to help

Please quote the parts of that article which answer my simple, reasonable questions. TIA.

(1) When did “Palestine” come into existence?

(2) What are the exact borders of “Palestine”?

(3) Exactly what is being done to “protect the borders” of “Palestine”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Capt\_Kirk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/779978/32.png) [@Capt\_Kirk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Capt_Kirk)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2012, 5:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458/169 "2012-12-02T17:50:22Z")

</div>

> [@brazil84](#):
>
> \<snip\>  
> (1) When did “Palestine” come into existence?
> 
> (2) What are the exact borders of “Palestine”?
> 
> (3) Exactly what is being done to “protect the borders” of “Palestine”?

1. Post WWI as the British Mandate through the Treaty of Versailles

2. 1948 Partition plan /1967 Borders Would be a good place to start. The West Bank and Gaza have to be contiguous for a Palestinian State to work. Israel has to have a defensible State, the right of return is a non starter, Palestinians are not going to get Haifa. This is the work ahead for final status negotiations. Israel has been willing to give up land for peace, I see no reason why it would not now. To answer the question, two States made up of the former mandate(approximately), with borders negotiated peacefully, each recognizing each other Sovereignty and probably a shared Capitol, Jerusalem per the Partition plan. I can dream can’t I.

3. Well there was that Palestinian State pre 67 that the Arab Nations so vigorously fought to defend that the Israelis just ran all over. IMO no one has protected the borders of a Palestinian State as the Arab Nations have been more than willing to use them as proxy fighters and a buffer against Israel, not that Israel is entirety innocent here. Bibi and the settlers really need to quit calling the WB Judea and Samarra and cool it on settlement building because at least some of that land will be Palestine.

That said I am optimistic, the Arab governments are quickly losing their ability to say “look shiny/Israel” and I am sure Israelis are tired of all of this. Will it be hard, yes. Is it doable yes.

Does that answer anything? Hope so

**Capt**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![brazil84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/8491ac/32.png) [@brazil84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/brazil84)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2012, 6:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458/170 "2012-12-02T18:23:05Z")

</div>

> [@Capt\_Kirk](#):
>
> Does that answer anything?

Not really – **newcomer** seems to be referring to “Palestine” as an actual political entity – not as a hypothetical entity. His position vis-a-vis the latest conflict seems to be that the people of “Palestine” are merely defending their borders against Israeli aggression. And that if Israeli would only stop its aggression against these borders, then the conflict would end.

I’m trying to nail him down as to what exactly he means by “Palestine”; what borders he is talking about; and so on. Needless to say, he is unable to come up with a coherent answer to these questions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ibn\_Warraq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/e19b73/32.png) [@Ibn\_Warraq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ibn_Warraq)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2012, 8:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458/171 "2012-12-02T20:01:04Z")

</div>

> [@Capt\_Kirk](#):
>
> 1. Post WWI as the British Mandate through the Treaty of Versailles
> 
> 2. 1948 Partition plan /1967 Borders Would be a good place to start. The West Bank and Gaza have to be contiguous for a Palestinian State to work. Israel has to have a defensible State, the right of return is a non starter, Palestinians are not going to get Haifa. This is the work ahead for final status negotiations. Israel has been willing to give up land for peace, I see no reason why it would not now. To answer the question, two States made up of the former mandate(approximately), with borders negotiated peacefully, each recognizing each other Sovereignty and probably a shared Capitol, Jerusalem per the Partition plan. I can dream can’t I.
> 
> 3. Well there was that Palestinian State pre 67 that the Arab Nations so vigorously fought to defend that the Israelis just ran all over. IMO no one has protected the borders of a Palestinian State as the Arab Nations have been more than willing to use them as proxy fighters and a buffer against Israel, not that Israel is entirety innocent here. Bibi and the settlers really need to quit calling the WB Judea and Samarra and cool it on settlement building because at least some of that land will be Palestine.
> 
> That said I am optimistic, the Arab governments are quickly losing their ability to say “look shiny/Israel” and I am sure Israelis are tired of all of this. Will it be hard, yes. Is it doable yes.
> 
> Does that answer anything? Hope so
> 
> **Capt**

Why shouldn’t the Palestinians get all of Jordan?

That was part of both historic and Mandatory Palestine and most of Jordan’s citizens are “Palestinians”.

Why not have Jordan be the Palestinian state since it already is the De Facto Palestinian state.

Besides, wouldn’t it be great if we made Jordan into a democracy instead of some half-assed autocracy ruled by a foreign royal family imposed by the British?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Noone\_Special](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/noone_special/32/2863_2.png) [@Noone\_Special](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Noone_Special)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2012, 8:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458/172 "2012-12-02T20:07:19Z")

</div>

> [@Ibn\_Warraq](#):
>
> Why shouldn’t the Palestinians get all of Jordan?
> 
> That was part of both historic and Mandatory Palestine and most of Jordan’s citizens are “Palestinians”.
> 
> Why not have Jordan be the Palestinian state since it already is the De Facto Palestinian state.
> 
> Besides, wouldn’t it be great if we made Jordan into a democracy instead of some half-assed autocracy ruled by a foreign royal family imposed by the British?

Who are you, what did you do with Ariel Sharon, and why aren’t you asleep…? :eek:

😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Capt\_Kirk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/779978/32.png) [@Capt\_Kirk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Capt_Kirk)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2012, 8:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458/173 "2012-12-02T20:29:19Z")

</div>

> [@brazil84](#):
>
> Not really – **newcomer** seems to be referring to “Palestine” as an actual political entity – not as a hypothetical entity. His position vis-a-vis the latest conflict seems to be that the people of “Palestine” are merely defending their borders against Israeli aggression. And that if Israeli would only stop its aggression against these borders, then the conflict would end.
> 
> I’m trying to nail him down as to what exactly he means by “Palestine”; what borders he is talking about; and so on. Needless to say, he is unable to come up with a coherent answer to these questions.

I am on the same tack as well, without a clear definition of Palestine and Palestinian we are talking in circles. Also, are we talking about an Israel on the map or not? I do not think that even Hamas believes Israel is going away, no matter how much they might wish to be gone, recognition of Israel is Hamas’ biggest chip in the game. This is why a single state is a non starter as well, Israel would lose the demographic war in a generation or two.

**Capt**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Capt\_Kirk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/779978/32.png) [@Capt\_Kirk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Capt_Kirk)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2012, 8:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458/174 "2012-12-02T20:42:18Z")

</div>

> [@Ibn\_Warraq](#):
>
> Why shouldn’t the Palestinians get all of Jordan?
> 
> That was part of both historic and Mandatory Palestine and most of Jordan’s citizens are “Palestinians”.
> 
> Why not have Jordan be the Palestinian state since it already is the De Facto Palestinian state.
> 
> Besides, wouldn’t it be great if we made Jordan into a democracy instead of some half-assed autocracy ruled by a foreign royal family imposed by the British?

Well considering that the Queen and Heirs are Palestinian, you can say it already is to an extent. If you want to play lets have a do over on the post WWI era, that is a whole nother box of rocks. A single united Arab nation, bounded by Turkey, Kurdistan, Iran, Sudan and Libya, both Sunni and Shiite or possibly a new Caliphate, good luck with that. If that could be done, I would still put odds on Israel in a fight.

**Capt**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gamerunknown](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/6bbea6/32.png) [@gamerunknown](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gamerunknown)\
**Post date:** [December 3, 2012, 8:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458/175 "2012-12-03T08:34:54Z")

</div>

> [@brazil84](#):
>
> (1) When did “Palestine” come into existence?
> 
> (2) What are the exact borders of “Palestine”?
> 
> (3) Exactly what is being done to “protect the borders” of “Palestine”?

1. How is this relevant? It is currently recognised as a state by the UN. There were Palestinian political parties vying for independence prior to its recognition, or even before the creation of the state of Israel (c.f Khalistan/Kurdistan/Bangladesh).

2. They’re defined by the UN.

3. Negotiation and war.

What do you consider to be Israel’s borders? Do you believe that a state can expand its territories by war?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![brazil84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/8491ac/32.png) [@brazil84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/brazil84)\
**Post date:** [December 3, 2012, 9:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458/176 "2012-12-03T09:13:29Z")

</div>

> [@gamerunknown](#):
>
> 1. How is this relevant?

Because I’m trying to figure out exactly what you mean by “Palestine” to better scrutinize your claim that “Palestine” is merely “protecting its borders.”

> [@](#):
>
> 1. They’re defined by the UN.

Lol, of course you cannot answer the question.

> [@](#):
>
> 1. Negotiation and war.

Lol, more evasiveness. Of course you refuse to define what you mean by “Palestine” to avoid scrutiny of your absurd claim that “Palestine” is merely “protecting its borders” from Israeli aggression.

Anyway, I have no interest in engaging with someone who hides his position behind a cloak of ambiguity. I asked you a few simple, reasonable questions so that I could understand your position and you did nothing but bob and weave.

Welcome to my ignore list.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Trinopus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/2bfe46/32.png) [@Trinopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Trinopus)\
**Post date:** [December 3, 2012, 11:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458/177 "2012-12-03T23:06:01Z")

</div>

> [@gamerunknown](#):
>
> 1. They’re defined by the UN.

Can you please point us to this definition? It must have been published somewhere.

> [@](#):
>
> Do you believe that a state can expand its territories by war?

I live in California. Yes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gamerunknown](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/6bbea6/32.png) [@gamerunknown](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gamerunknown)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2012, 6:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458/178 "2012-12-04T18:12:42Z")

</div>

> [@Trinopus](#):
>
> Can you please point us to this definition? It must have been published somewhere.

In the operative provisions of the General Assembly resolution 67/19 they simply use the term “pre-1967 borders”. It’s reasonable to assume that’d include the West Bank (with East Jerusalem), rather than returning them to “Transjordan” or whatever.

> [@](#):
>
> I live in California. Yes.

Do you believe in any trammels on the power of states?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/we-should-give-israel-to-the-mormons/641458.md?page=8)
