I go for the landfill solution. It’s where so much of it ends up anyway.
How about burning plastic to produce energy? Is it true that plastics burn cleanly at 2000° or higher? We’re burning coal and oil anyway, might as well get more use from the oil we turned into plastic.
That’s my take, also. I’ll crack open a half-liter soda in the beginning of the work day, and sip it all day long. A can would a) go flat faster, and b) be much more of a spill risk. Same thing with car trips. I rarely finish the bottle, but of course the smaller bottles are more money, and waste, per ounce.
Glass or aluminum would be better in terms of waste.
When I’m not working or driving, I keep a couple of larger bottles of it on the dining table (one caffeinated, one not). I’ll get a glass, fill it with ice, and pour whatever I want. I usually drink more liquid that way, too.
Does anyone know whether bottle-deposit laws make a significant difference in the amount of waste? I think both Vermont and New York have such laws, but I’ve rarely bothered when travelling there. For Vermont, since we’re usually driving, I’ll usually bring the bottles home and recycle them here.
Well, there would be short-ish (a generation or two) impact to the economy etc. if the population started decreasing drastically, as the economy tends to need some population growth.
But then in a generation or two, the world would be a MUCH better place.
Re the COVID / sterility: Either people would become a LOT more diligent re vaccines and masks, or it would be Darwin in action.
I don’t believe that’s true any more. New fleece is only slightly more expensive to buy, and much lighter, so it’s cheaper to ship. And it works better as a blanket, especially if it gets wet.
You know there’s affordable outpatient surgery that does that for men…
The nice part now is that once the women I’m interested in age out past the “sex = baby-maybe” stage they get a lot more willing to experiment. I was always so willing; them (understandably) not so much.