Sadly, no. They probably blew up something else though…I misremember what the other story line was. On a bright note, though, Kari was wearing a tight shirt and jeans, which is always a high point.
-XT
That probably depressed brain usage pretty hard.
snerk
Hard.
One story I saw years ago claimed that the story originated with a patient who was found to have some kind of swelling in his skull, such that his brain developed occupying about 10 percent of the space a brain would normally occupy, though it was perfectly functional. I think this came up on the Snopes Message board, but I haven’t heard about it since.
Wouldn’t that be two high points?
I’m not very good at math, and seeing her in a tight tee shirt that leaves her tummy exposed, and skin tight jeans tends to shut down what little brain power I have as the blood flows…erm, to somewhere other than my brain.
-XT
Methinks you should listen to the sound of whoosh.
NZT is a fake drug from the movie Limitless. The protagonist takes it and does all the things listed, then finds out if he quits it will make his brain mush.
I figured the origin was from the early days of brain science, and some scientist’s statement about only knowing what 10% of the brain does - you know, “we’ve only mapped out 10% of the brain yet, but we will keep at it”. That got morphed into “we only use 10% of our brains”.
But I have no cite.
To my mind, the late Barry Beyerstein conducted the best exploration for origins of this belief. His paper, “Whence Cometh the Myth that We Only Use Ten Percent of Our Brains?,” is no longer hosted by Simon Fraser University, but it’s still available (in PDF form) via the Internet Archive.
The analogy I’ve always used is it’s like the rooms in your house. You may only be in one room at any given time but that doesn’t mean the other rooms aren’t used.
And, for those who don’t want to read pages and pages of erudite whining, William James, in a speech to the American Philosophical Association, said something like “the average man develops only ten percent of his latent mental abilities” (the quote is from Dale Carnegie).
Not a word about the brain; he was just saying that people are lazy.
Irishman, I just read the article Limitless - Wikipedia and cannot even tell what was wrong about the nootropic drug in question. Why didn’t the protagonist keep taking it to avoid hangovers? Was it Flowers for Algernon or Pebble in the Sky type of a deal with significantly shorter lifespan for the genius involved?
But that is not much closer to being true than the original version. Although the typical fMRI or PET scan (or other brain imaging technique) only shows a fairly small proportion of the brain to be “lit-up” at any one time, it does not follow (and is not the case) that the rest is not doing anything. These imaging techniques show up the most active areas at some point in time, but it does not mean that the rest is not doing anything (or even that it is not doing anything relevant to the current cognitive task).
My WAG as to the origin of the 10% (or whatever other figures you may see quoted) myth is that, not so very long ago, neuroscientists were only able to ascribe definite functions to a small proportion of the brain, and the specific functions of the other parts were essentially unknown. Brain maps from 40 or 50 years ago would have large areas labeled as “association cortex”, which meant, in effect, “we don’t know what this part is for, but it is probably important for thinking, somehow.” The expression “association cortex” still occasionally appears in neuroscience publications, even though functions (often multiple ones) have been attributed to pretty much every tiny bit of the brain by now. Anyhow, it does not seem implausible that someone might confuse “we do not know what 90% of the brain does” (true not so long ago) with “90% of the brain does not do anything” (which no serious scientist ever believed).
I have a vacuum cleaner. I use it 10min/week. I’m not worried.
code_grey , I’m going to spoiler this, since it’s about the movie (even though the link pretty much blows the whole plot.)
[spoiler]He started taking it, and then started taking it in increased doses, and that caused him to have blackouts and lost time. During one of the blackouts, he vaguely recalls hooking up with a hot chick, who turns up dead, and he’s the last person to have been seen with her. So he tries to quit cold turkey, and learns that causes the “hangovers” - migraines and cold-sweats and incapacitating weakness. Then he finds out his ex-wife took the stuff, and she’s now a fried out near cripple, because she quit taking it.
He finds out that if he maintains an even dose he avoids all the problems. But he has a limited supply. He originally obtained a bag full with a couple hundred pills (no quantity ever stated), but doesn’t know where they come from or how to get more. He hires a chemist to reverse engineer the forumula.
Then his stash is stolen from him, so he’s left without any, a 6 month *minimum *delay before he could possibly see his chemist pay off, and a Russian gangster coming after him.[/spoiler]