A friend of mine says that if he is ever called for jury duty on a death penalty case and is asked his opinion, he’s going to say, “If you’ll build the gallows, I’ll make the noose.”
Oh, and I hereby nominate The King of Soup for the post of Lord High Executioner.
The article said that Washington’s primary mode of execution today is lethal injection. I’d take hanging over electrocution any day, which I think is completely cruel especially since a good number of people survive the first shock. Hanging also preserves the organs for transplant, unlike electrocution, gassing, or the firing squad. I’m anti-death penalty anyway, but at least use a method that causes the least pain and has the most benefit for the living.
With the sole exception of Nebraska (which retains the electric chair), every jurisdiction in the U.S. has moved to lethal injection as its method of execution, at least for new sentences. (Many states still have people on death row who were sentenced to some other form of execution before the state switched to lethal injection, and generally the state will use the old method if the convict insists on it.)
How many of the executed agree to let their organs be donated? I can’t say for sure, but I’m pretty sure my attitude would be along the lines of “fuck that” if asked to donate mine after being put to death.
Easy. The guy on Death Row who’s next in line has to live in the gallows until it’s his turn. I’d be pretty sure to clean all the blood and guts out of the gallows if I had to live there for any length of time.
I still remember hearing about someone in Florida talking about their electric chair taking multiple charges to kill people, and saying it was a great deterrant. “Hey, don’t commit a capital crime in Florida! We have the death penalty and our chair ain’t workin’ so good!”
Hey, you can still get firing squads in Idaho and Oklahoma. (Utah stopped offering it as a choice two years ago, but if the people convicted before the law changed and chose “ready, aim, fire” actually do end up getting killed - they can still go that way.)
Last time I checked, you can still choose hanging in Washington. If that’s your thing.
Idaho only authorizes firing squads if lethal injection is “impractical”; I guess if you’re hellbent on posing for gunfire in Idaho, maybe you could take up recreational narcotics to the point where your veins are all messed up. Oklahoma only authorizes firing squads if both lethal injections and electrocution have been ruled unconstitutional.
Has anyone read that bit of Does Anything Eat Wasps? where the matter of whether guillotining is humane or not is answered?
There is anectdotal evidence that the head might still be aware and conscious of pain for several seconds after decapitation. Not, perhaps, ideal.
Of course, a really humane execution would require medical expertise, and doctors are usually advised by their professional bodies to have no part in executions (as it shreds the “first do no harm” principle into itsy-bitsy pieces).
For example, a properly induced general anaesthetic, followed by a massive dose of IV potassium (or any other method such as the guillotine) would be much more humane and reliable and the somewhat hit and miss affair of the current triple lethal injection.
But, like I said, you want a humane execution you need a doctor, and no doctor could assist in executions without censure from their professional body.
If we must execute, we should just reinstate the “jerk to Jesus”. (Tie a trebuchet to a rope and put it around the condemned’s head. Release trebuchet. Only time it was tried the head was flung rather than the expected body.)
There’s also a chapter devoted to this in Mary Roach’s Stiff. I don’t recall the ultimate conclusion, but there was certainly a lot of anecdotal discussion around the fact that guillotining wasn’t “instadeath”.
(Of course, it was a lot more accurate and less grisly than the poor, overworked axeman. S’all relative.)