# Werewolf (Mafia)--The Split \[Signups--In progress\] **URL:** \ **Category:** The Game Room\ **Created:** [February 13, 2009, 3:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/werewolf-mafia-the-split-signups-in-progress/485692 "2009-02-13T15:44:54Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 1125
**Author:** ![AllWalker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/db5fbb/32.png) [@AllWalker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AllWalker)\ **Post date:** [March 11, 2009, 3:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/werewolf-mafia-the-split-signups-in-progress/485692/1125 "2009-03-11T03:34:48Z")
It has been brought to my attention that my case against **Oredigger** was, well, lacking, so here goes… Oredigger falls into the catagory of high poster/low suspicion. But so do others, and there are plenty with less suspicion, so this reason is only part of it. There is quite a lot of fluff and testeriser talk from Oredigger - talking about the testeriser is a good way for wolves to look like they are contributing, but really it is just pointless speculation at this point. But then there is the strategy posts. For both **Seeker** and **FS** Oredigger argued against voting for these people - once their vote counts were so high that lynching was almost guaranteed. It certainly looks good, defending people who turn out to be innocent - but the wolves _knew_ that they were innocent, and that trying to save them was likely a lost cause. The case against **EH** is simple, but no less valid. Low vote count, fluff posts, no justification for votes and a highly defensive and aggressive attitude. **Telcontar** used to top my suspicions list, but lately I have found his posts perfectly reasonable. Could be a wolf’s reaction to a near-lynch experience, but it could also be a townie’s reaction to NLE, or just a natural change in post style. Worth keeping an eye on, just like everybody else. --- _[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/werewolf-mafia-the-split-signups-in-progress/485692)._