[QUOTE=zelie zelerton]
Ah I get you. It sounds similar to National Rail signalling although there’s never a red involved unless you want the train to stop (shunting moves aside). Depending on how many colour lights you have (up to four I think) you have signals detailing how many sections ahead are clear. Many tube drivers have to learn both Underground signalling and National Rail signalling because lines extend outside of LUL. The signalling for NR and the signalling your trains have makes sense because of the speed of the trains - our little chuffers will perhaps do 70mph maximum! And the ones I am on will rarely do more than 50.
I forgot to reply to **Dangermom ** earlier. There’s a great book called London’s Disused Underground Stations by J E Connor that has a lot of information about the ghost stations. There are some pretty good websites on the subject too.
Sorry but you can’t breach Emslie’s Subtractional Allegory with a Sideways Scnickelgrube on a Saturday like that so I’ll have to set you back to Euston Square
[/QUOTE]
One of the better books on the subject was written by NF Stovold, but unfortunately like his earlier work “Mornington Crescent: Rules and Origins” this is very rare and many think that no copies still exist.
QUOTE=Pjen]One of the better books on the subject was written by NF Stovold, but unfortunately like his earlier work “Mornington Crescent: Rules and Origins” this is very rare and many think that no copies still exist.
Dollis Hill
[/QUOTE]
Dollis Hill? Not allowed when raining old chap. I say again, Kings Cross using the Pitsdorf double conjecture
[QUOTE=Pjen]
One of the better books on the subject was written by NF Stovold, but unfortunately like his earlier work “Mornington Crescent: Rules and Origins” this is very rare and many think that no copies still exist.
Dollis Hill
[/QUOTE]
Utter bunkum. It’s reissued every year to staff as the evidence clearly shows. As you can see it’s a hefty tome
[QUOTE=chowder]
QUOTE=Pjen]One of the better books on the subject was written by NF Stovold, but unfortunately like his earlier work “Mornington Crescent: Rules and Origins” this is very rare and many think that no copies still exist.
Dollis Hill
[/QUOTE]
Dollis Hill? Not allowed when raining old chap. I say again, Kings Cross using the Pitsdorf double conjecture
[/QUOTE]
It’s not raining in London. And even if it was, it wouldn’t be underground. Move permitted!
[QUOTE=zelie zelerton]
Dollis Hill? Not allowed when raining old chap. I say again, Kings Cross using the Pitsdorf double conjectureground. Move permitted!
[/QUOTE]
Thanks for showing me a copy of Stovald- I sometimes doubted its existence.
Now that that move has been accepted I would point out that it sends this game into the Dollis Hill Loop:
Dollis Hill is frequently mentioned in the humorous game Mornington Crescent. Traditionally, the playing of Dollis Hill starts a “Dollis Hill Loop”, meaning that every subsequent move made by any player must be to Dollis Hill. Various ingenious ways to break the loop have been invented by Mornington Crescent players in the past.
If you are all so clever, let’s see how long it takes you to unloop the loop.
(I was having internet problems the other day and was nable to post this.)
Transport for London had a contest for ways to air condiiton the deep stations. The Economist reported on it a couple of months ago. Since these tubes have to have ground water pumped out constantly, the idea was to use this water to carry out the waste heat.
In fact, if you’re obsessively interested in things subway (otherwise known as a “foamer” for the tendency to foam at the mouth when discussing the trains), nycsubway.org is a good place to explore.
