All behavior of non-consent is cognitive dementia IMO; however, the capacity to render joy from such an activity by prolonging the suffering or raping the villagers is more indicitive of irreperable logical dementia. There is nothing wrong with killing a person IMO; however, If it is anything short of instantaneous de-molecularization before they have the chance to know what the hell is happening or to be bothered by a presense in regards to the person doing the killing; then I charachterize it as non-consentual. If somebody is actually meant to endure for whatever reason, a 10,000 ton nuclear blast where they are standing at the “turn to dust point” just outside of point zero; they will still survive. If they don’t, then their reason didn’t matter in the first place and they were simply delusional; addictive.
The same can be said about protracted killings; for certainly many will recieve radiation poisoning on the perimeter and die laborous deaths as a result of this action. These actions are stimulated from individuals wrapped in palaces, doing drugs, contradicting themselves and buying polygamy like there’s no tommorow; meniachly basking in their own opulence as proof of their superiroty. It is a contradiction to order a death; or to be the beneficiary of a death ordered and accept that benefit; as suicide is more logical.
It really boils down to a severe cognitive dementia IMO. The behavioral evidence of this is the capacity to horde capital in an existence where the pain of suicide is being abused for slave labor to create these pockets in the first place. ; by denying the option of consent, and effectively declaring ones own capacity of qualty in light of the disproof of it which they are blocking by virtue of a selective lottery of being born into such a complex spacially. These types of individuals cannot abstract data field algorythms that produce the types of materials they are using to prove their worth; as the process with which they are being used shows.
I agree that this phenomenon is not particularly measuable, as the behavior itself is irreducably common; and it’s use only depends upon ones ‘luck’ of spacial designation when brought into being.
The general idea behind this phenomenon resides in an individual who will poison society into a handicap; and refuse to tell them; but rather boast about their capability and virtualize integrity by behaviorally mocking empathy and comapassion for the ‘less fortunate’. Their entire being is effectively a lie with no existential pressure created in their environment with which to consider different options.
-Justhink