# What Amendment would you add to the US Constitution? **URL:** \ **Category:** In My Humble Opinion\ **Created:** [June 17, 2007, 6:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-amendment-would-you-add-to-the-us-constitution/408377 "2007-06-17T18:12:50Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 5\ **Page:** 5
**Author:** ![Projammer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/projammer/32/559_2.png) [@Projammer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Projammer)\ **Post date:** [August 1, 2017, 8:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-amendment-would-you-add-to-the-us-constitution/408377/81 "2017-08-01T20:35:43Z")
That all elections include a final selection for “None of the above”. If said selection receives the plurality of votes, the election shall be re-administered with all of the previous candidates disqualified and damn the expense. ---
**Author:** ![Sage\_Rat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sage_rat/32/399_2.png) [@Sage\_Rat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sage_Rat)\ **Post date:** [August 1, 2017, 8:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-amendment-would-you-add-to-the-us-constitution/408377/82 "2017-08-01T20:54:21Z")
> [@Projammer](#): > > That all elections include a final selection for “None of the above”. If said selection receives the plurality of votes, the election shall be re-administered with all of the previous candidates disqualified and damn the expense. I want “damn the expense” to actually be part of the wording. ---
**Author:** ![Procrustus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/procrustus/32/2994_2.png) [@Procrustus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Procrustus)\ **Post date:** [August 1, 2017, 8:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-amendment-would-you-add-to-the-us-constitution/408377/83 "2017-08-01T20:58:37Z")
> [@Velocity](#): > > Prohibit discrimination in employment, etc. on the basis of political views, or the penalizing, even by private organizations or employers, of employees on the basis of political views. Boy, I disagree with this one. Freedom, etc. I work with one Trump voter, and she’s okay generally. But I sure wouldn’t want to hire another one. ---
**Author:** ![Ravenman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ravenman/32/2929_2.png) [@Ravenman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ravenman)\ **Post date:** [August 1, 2017, 9:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-amendment-would-you-add-to-the-us-constitution/408377/84 "2017-08-01T21:10:15Z")
> [@Quimby](#): > > They have used Personhood First amendment arguments to protect political donations and literally the right to lie in their advertising. I’m not familiar with most of what you’re talking about, but corporations cannot make donations to Federal candidates. When you see news articles that say that Boeing gave $1 million to Joe Smith, it means that many individuals employed by Boeing gave personal donations to that candidate, while complying with the laws regarding caps on individual contributions. ---
**Author:** ![cmkeller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cmkeller/32/118_2.png) [@cmkeller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cmkeller)\ **Post date:** [August 1, 2017, 9:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-amendment-would-you-add-to-the-us-constitution/408377/85 "2017-08-01T21:21:31Z")
In the event that private property has been taken by a government through exercise of Eminent Domain, it may not be transferred to a non-governmental entity without first being offered back to the prior private owner or their heirs for the exact price (NOT inflation-adjusted) that the government paid to take it, or less. [Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-amendment-would-you-add-to-the-us-constitution/408377.md?page=4)