# What area of the U.S. is least prone to natural disasters?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [April 28, 2011, 10:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086 "2011-04-28T22:40:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ludovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@Ludovic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ludovic)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 12:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086/41 "2011-04-29T12:38:16Z")

</div>

I vote for upstate NY as well. Not much affected by hurricanes, tornadoes, or earthquakes (even though it is technically in an earthquake zone.) Plus most places are not in flood or landslide zones, and many places do not get very bad blizzards, either. At least I’d rather have the blizzards in any place but Buffalo than the heat waves that affect the entire South for 6 months of the year.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MentalGuy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/439d5e/32.png) [@MentalGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MentalGuy)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 1:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086/42 "2011-04-29T13:07:05Z")

</div>

> [@Randy\_Seltzer](#):
>
> Several good additions. But note that I was trying to list natural disasters that are particularly likely in a given state. Not just possible in a given state. I mean, Alabama is currently experiencing some of the worst tornadoes in the history of the country, but “tornado” aren’t on the list for Alabama because tornadoes are an aberration there.

I don’t really think tornadoes are an aberration in Alabama. There were often tornado warnings in the four years I lived there, and it seems when severe storm weather comes, it often comes through the Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia corridor. Now half-mile wide super tornadoes were not common, but they are not common anywhere.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NinetyWt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/cc9497/32.png) [@NinetyWt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/NinetyWt)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 4:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086/43 "2011-04-29T16:08:15Z")

</div>

Vermont and New York are in Region 1 shown on my linked map. The most common disasters seem to be ‘severe storm’ and ‘flood’. (IOW **bouv** is correct about the hazard of flood there).

According to pie chart for Region IV (includes Alabama), the risk of tornado is significant but overshadowed by ‘severe storm’, ‘flood’, and ‘hurricane’. Tornadoes appear to be a significant hazard in all the Southern states, as well as the Midwest.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cyberhwk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/7993a0/32.png) [@Cyberhwk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cyberhwk)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 8:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086/44 "2011-04-29T20:00:06Z")

</div>

[quote=“Randy\_Seltzer, post:13, topic:580086”]

[li]WA, OR - Avalanche, blizzard, tsunami[/li][/QUOTE]

:dubious: The most an Avalanche is probably going to do is screw up your travel plans and except for some [smaller towns up north](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winthrop,_Washington) blizzard conditions are nearly unheard of. Mt. St. Helens killed “only” 57.

The only major mass casualty (say 100+) natural event I could see for Washington would be [The Big One](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_One).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chingon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chingon/32/17645_2.png) [@Chingon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chingon)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 8:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086/45 "2011-04-29T20:15:12Z")

</div>

KS is pretty damn safe. Even with tornadoes, the damage done is limited by the sparseness and the loss of human life is low.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bump](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7c8e57/32.png) [@bump](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bump)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 8:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086/46 "2011-04-29T20:19:08Z")

</div>

> [@Randy\_Seltzer](#):
>
> [ul]  
> [li]AK - Avalanche, blizzard, drought, flood/landslide, tsunami, volcano, wildfire[/li][li]HI - Cyclone/hurricane, tsunami, volcano[/li][li]WA, OR - Avalanche, blizzard, tsunami[/li][li]CA - Drought, earthquake, flood/landslide, heat wave, tsunami, wildfire[/li][li]ID - Blizzard, volcano[/li][li]NV, AZ - Drought, heat wave[/li][li]MT, WY, ND, SD - Blizzard, earthquake, volcano[/li][li]CO - Avalanche, blizzard, drought, earthquake, volcano[/li][li]NM - Drought, heat wave, wildfire[/li][li]ND, SD - Blizzard, earthquake, tornado volcano[/li][li]NE - Blizzard, tornado, volcano[/li][li]KS - Blizzard, tornado[/li][li]OK - Tornado, heatwave, wildfire[/li][li]TX - Cyclone/hurricane, drought, heatwave, tornado, wildfire[/li][li]MN, IA - Blizzard, flood[/li][li]WI, MI - Blizzard[/li][li]MO, IL - Blizzard, flood, tornado[/li][li]AR - ?[/li][li]LA, MS, AL, GA, FL - Cyclone/hurricane, flood, heatwave[/li][li]IN, OH, KY, TN - ?[/li][li]SC, NC - Heatwave[/li][li]WV, VA, MD, DC - ?[/li][li]PA, NJ, NY, CT, RI, MA, ME - Blizzard[/li][li]VT, NH - Avalanche, blizzard[/li][/ul]The list presumes the Yellowstone caldera is a volcano risk, and states along the Mississippi have higher flood risks.

Pretty much anywhere along the Atlantic coast or the Gulf coast is at risk for hurricanes, with the Gulf coast states and lower Atlantic ones like SC and GA being at the most risk. Hurricanes do however occasionally go as far north as Boston though.

> **[1938 New England hurricane](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1938_New_England_hurricane)**
>
> The 1938 New England Hurricane (also referred to as the Great Long Island - New England Hurricane and the Long Island Express) was one of the deadliest and most destructive tropical cyclones to strike the United States. The storm formed near the coast of Africa on September 9, becoming a Category 5 hurricane on the Saffir–Simpson hurricane scale, before making landfall as a Category 3 hurricane on Long Island on Wednesday, September 21. It is estimated that the hurricane killed 682 peopl The s...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GreasyJack](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/df705f/32.png) [@GreasyJack](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GreasyJack)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 9:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086/47 "2011-04-29T21:33:42Z")

</div>

> [@Cyberhwk](#):
>
> :dubious: The most an Avalanche is probably going to do is screw up your travel plans and except for some [smaller towns up north](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winthrop,_Washington) blizzard conditions are nearly unheard of. Mt. St. Helens killed “only” 57.

Well, to be fair, Mt.St.Helens was a piddling little firecracker of a volcano as far as explosive volcanic eruptions go and was situated in such a way that the mudflow damage to populated areas was minimal.

The biggest threat to the Seattle/Tacoma area is Mt. Rainier, which has bigger eruptions for one, but also has the potential for devastating lahars. These are mudflows caused when water from melting snow mixes with volcanic material that set up like concrete when they stop. A great deal of the Seattle/Tacoma metro area and their suburbs are built on top of Mt.Rainier lahars, so they certainly have the potential to reach heavily populated areas. What’s worse is that the mountain doesn’t even need to erupt for this to happen-- Mt. Rainier has a huge amount of water tied up in it its glaciers and is overly tall and structurally unstable from hydrothermal activity. There is potential for serious lahar events triggered by the mountain simply collapsing, perhaps in a worst-case scenario triggered by a major Cascadia earthquake. Although lahars exacerbated by severe ashfall from an eruption would be no picnic either.

Of course, the important question is that if Mt. Rainier erupts and kills many thousands, will they keep it on the license plate?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chimera](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/8e8cbc/32.png) [@Chimera](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chimera)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2011, 10:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086/48 "2011-04-29T22:34:20Z")

</div>

OH NOES! WE HAD AN EARTHQUAKE IN MINNESOTA!!!

> **[(Tiny) Earthquake (Barely) Rattles Minn.](https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/tiny-earthquake-rattles-minn/)**
>
> A rare earthquake struck western Minnesota early Friday, rattling ceiling tiles and prompting a few curious callers to phone 911 but going largely unnoticed by most of the sleeping public, authorities said.

A 2.5 Earthquake in north central Minnesota at 2:20am this morning.

“The USGS says the largest earthquake recorded in Minnesota was a magnitude 4.6 quake that caused minor damage to walls and foundations in Stevens County around Morris. But Chandler said the most destructive was in Staples in 1917. Its magnitude was estimated at 4.3, and it knocked over chimneys, shook items off shelves and shattered windows, he said.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![skdo23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a5b964/32.png) [@skdo23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/skdo23)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2011, 1:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086/49 "2011-04-30T01:17:34Z")

</div>

I’ll second that (I’m from central VT, which is geographically similar to the Albany area). There are just too many mountains, etc., for a tornado to gain enough momentum to do significant damage, even if the proper conditions exist for one to form (rare). Like Chuck says, hurricanes become weaker as they fly over land (I live about 200 miles from the nearest coastline in NH) so by the time they reach us they are really just heavy, long lasting rainstorms. Most injuries/deaths that can be “blamed” on mother nature occur when drivers lose control of their vehicle due to snow/ice. Occasionally, there is property damage due to flooding when a river rises due to a severe infusion of water from heavy rains or large amounts of snow and ice melting quickly in spring, but damage is usually confined to areas in the immediate vicinity of the river.

> [@RealityChuck](#):
>
> Upstate New York (the Albany area) has very few.
> 
> 1. Tornadoes: I’ve been here 40 years and there has only been one confirmed tornado in the area.
> 2. Earthquakes: Only one, a gentle shaking that just rattled windows and caused no damage.
> 3. Tsunamis: We’re over 100 miles inland. No chance.
> 4. Wildfires: Never heard of one in the area.
> 5. Hurricanes: too far from the ocean to get the full force; they do sometimes dump a lot of rain, but with little damage and no loss of life.
> 6. Volcanoes: none.
> 7. Rockslides: every once in awhile, but rarely in inhabited areas. The Adirondacks are old mountains; most of the rockslides happened centuries ago.
> 8. Snowstorms: The worst. But it’s rare they they’re more than an inconvenience; snow can be shoveled and will eventually melt.
> 9. Heat waves: the most likely, but that means temperatures in the 90s.
> 
> I’d guess Vermont has similar conditions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chimera](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/8e8cbc/32.png) [@Chimera](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chimera)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2011, 2:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086/50 "2011-04-30T02:00:46Z")

</div>

[http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/states/state\_largest.php](http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/states/state_largest.php)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![notfrommensa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/f14d63/32.png) [@notfrommensa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/notfrommensa)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2011, 2:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086/51 "2011-04-30T02:43:44Z")

</div>

I don’t have a cite but I heard that there is actuarial data that gives New Mexico the lowest multiplier for Natural Disasters.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Civil\_Guy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/d78d45/32.png) [@Civil\_Guy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Civil_Guy)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2011, 3:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086/52 "2011-04-30T03:37:00Z")

</div>

> [@Chimera](#):
>
> OH NOES! WE HAD AN EARTHQUAKE IN MINNESOTA!!!
> 
> [(Tiny) Earthquake (Barely) Rattles Minn. - CBS Minnesota](http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2011/04/29/tiny-earthquake-rattles-minn/)
> 
> A 2.5 Earthquake in north central Minnesota at 2:20am this morning.
> 
> “The USGS says the largest earthquake recorded in Minnesota was a magnitude 4.6 quake that caused minor damage to walls and foundations in Stevens County around Morris. But Chandler said the most destructive was in Staples in 1917. Its magnitude was estimated at 4.3, and it knocked over chimneys, shook items off shelves and shattered windows, he said.”

Well, okay then. We don’t have any 4.6 magnitude earthquakes in California. That we notice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [May 1, 2011, 11:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086/53 "2011-05-01T23:26:24Z")

</div>

[Here](http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/01/weekinreview/01marsh.html)’s an article from the New York Times on this question. Various metro areas in Oregon and Washington State (along with Grand Junction, Colorado) have the lowest risk.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NinetyWt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/cc9497/32.png) [@NinetyWt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/NinetyWt)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2011, 1:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086/54 "2011-05-02T01:30:32Z")

</div>

> [@notfrommensa](#):
>
> I don’t have a cite but I heard that there is actuarial data that gives New Mexico the lowest multiplier for Natural Disasters.

The cite you are looking for is the map to which which I posted a link in post #39, which also seems to have been largely ignored. :dubious:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chacoguy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/50afbb/32.png) [@chacoguy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/chacoguy)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2011, 1:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086/55 "2011-05-02T01:56:02Z")

</div>

> [@Dewey\_Finn](#):
>
> [Here](http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/01/weekinreview/01marsh.html)’s an article from the New York Times on this question. Various metro areas in Oregon and Washington State (along with Grand Junction, Colorado) have the lowest risk.

Yup, if you get kilt here, you’ll die screaming and alone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GreasyJack](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/df705f/32.png) [@GreasyJack](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GreasyJack)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2011, 2:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086/56 "2011-05-02T02:02:32Z")

</div>

The trouble is that the FEMA map only really covers semi-frequently recurring disasters like tornadoes, flooding and hurricanes. A lot of the supposedly “safe” regions by that measure have the potential for serious disasters that just so happen to have not occurred during the brief history of white settlement. For example, most of the population of New Mexico lives within the Rio Grande Rift, which has had strong earthquakes and volcanic activity in historic times, just not since white folks have lived there. Ditto with the various geologic hazards facing the Pacific Northwest. These hazards occur much less frequently than the weather hazards, but are potentially much more damaging. So I suppose which is more threatening depends on your own personal definition of risk.

Also, that FEMA map is based on presidential declarations of emergency which mainly serve to release extra federal funds to mitigate a disaster and which don’t necessarily correlate directly to the frequency of disasters in general. For one, these are sometimes politically-motivated, but also they depend on the number of people living in those areas. If disaster strikes some rural backwater, usually you don’t need special federal funds to deal with it, whereas they might be if a similar disaster strikes in a city. I think the map in that post bears this out as most of the high-disaster counties are simply the higher population ones. Also, something like a major snowstorm might not warrant an emergency declaration in a town that regularly gets them like, say, Buffalo, but it might warrant one in Atlanta, for example.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NinetyWt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/cc9497/32.png) [@NinetyWt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/NinetyWt)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2011, 1:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086/57 "2011-05-02T13:09:21Z")

</div>

Thank you for at least commenting on its usefulness to the discussion.

I would contend that the presidential declarations do give a good indication of the severity of natural disasters occuring in each county, which translates (to me) to a location’s relative “safety”. I think that the smaller, more frequent event wouldn’t pose a threat to people and could be ignored.

It is a relatively short period of record, 'tis true.

Just notice this [map](http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/05/01/weekinreview/01safe.html) which Brynda posted in another forum. Haven’t had time to look at it yet.

> [@](#):
>
> The analysis below, by Sperling’s Best Places, a publisher of city rankings, is an attempt to assess a combination of those risks in 379 American metro areas. Risks for twisters and hurricanes (including storms from hurricane remnants) are based on historical data showing where storms occurred. Earthquake risks are based on United States Geological Survey assessments and take into account the relative infrequency of quakes, compared with weather events and floods. Additional hazards included in this analysis: flooding, drought, hail and other extreme weather.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FairLadyinSoCal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/bc79bd/32.png) [@FairLadyinSoCal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FairLadyinSoCal)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2012, 12:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086/58 "2012-10-30T00:27:46Z")

</div>

> [@runner pat](#):
>
> Central Valley in California. Local flooded streets with very heavy rainfall is as bad as it gets.

but the Central Valley in California has had the highest rate of car theft in the nation for many years and still tops every list.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FairLadyinSoCal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/bc79bd/32.png) [@FairLadyinSoCal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FairLadyinSoCal)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2012, 12:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086/59 "2012-10-30T00:29:59Z")

</div>

Boise, Idaho and most places in Arizona seem pretty free of natural disasters. The Pacific Northwest gets pretty severe black ice every few years where driving is treacherous for a few days.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Michael63129](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/3da27b/32.png) [@Michael63129](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Michael63129)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2012, 12:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086/60 "2012-10-30T00:43:49Z")

</div>

> [@FairLadyinSoCal](#):
>
> but the Central Valley in California has had the highest rate of car theft in the nation for many years and still tops every list.

That’s not a natural disaster though, it’s because of all of the zombies (note the date of the post before yours).

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-area-of-the-u-s-is-least-prone-to-natural-disasters/580086.md?page=4)
