What could be more "Cafe Society" than Coffee, right?

When I moved to Seattle in the mid-90s, I chose the occasion to switch to Folgers Crystals. But as I age, and can have only 1 cup per day, I’d like it to taste better, so lately I’ve been experimenting with real coffee at home, I refuse to buy the stuff prepared. I only drink it black, which is useful for taste-testing since there’s no possible disguise.

The current method is Melitta/pour-over, one mug’s worth at a time, using beans I ground moments before in a chop-grinder.* More out of superstition than settled science, I let the gooseneck kettle come off the boil for a few seconds before pouring, then do the moisten/bloom thing for several more seconds, while turning around widdershins in case that helps too. (It’s no trouble and no added cost, so why not, even though I’m not sure it’s doing anything. The bloom thing, I mean, not the spinning around, which I don’t actually do.)

Sticking with those methods as a control, I’m now trying to find the right bean. Best so far is Kirkland House Blend medium roast. Right now I’m working through a bag of Trader Joe’s house blend which is pricier and worse. What I really want, and am not finding yet, is some tang, not the astronaut drink, but that quality of good coffee that’s not too strong, not too dark, but tastes so good black that you’d drink it even if it weren’t the necessary daily medication that it is.

*As with so many things, some changes get you only tiny incremental improvements that might not be worth the trouble or price. I’ll have to be convinced that a burr grinder is really worth it, for example, given that a chop-grinder is vastly superior to pre-ground (we might all agree). The beans selection, I have no clue, but whatever-it-is needs to be pretty affordable, nothing too exotic. I like the Melitta method and don’t see any automatic machine as any more convenient, just more things to wash.

Re: the burr grinder thing, I was skeptical as well, until I got one. I used the blade/spice grinder method for years and it was fine for my pour-over cone coffee. I started using my French press more and more, and eventually that became primary. Enter the burr grinder - for French press coffee, you need the grounds to be consistent, otherwise you get too much sludge (too fine), or not enough flavor (too coarse). The burr grinder gives you consistent grounds every time (and is adjustable - some beans are drier than others and grind differently). With the blade grinder it was not as consistent, as the amount of time I was grinding was not set. IMHO the difference was enough to justify switching - great cup every time.

WTF, dude?

That sounds like

When I moved to Paris, I chose the occasion to switch to eating only McDonalds.

You move to the USA’s coffee culture mecca and you switch to vile instant??!?

I’m not sure I’d be willing to sully my toilet by pouring Folgers Crystals in there. :wink:

Sometimes you need a Le Royal Deluxe with Bacon.

Our methods are very similar. I, too, used a blade grinder for decades and wasn’t persuaded a burr grinder would make that much difference. Most recently, I had a particular blade grinder that I really liked, first made by Melitta. It was wonderful. Sadly, it has a design flaw that causes a plastic bit on the lid to break, rendering the entire unit useless.

The first one was best made and lasted the longest. By the time I got around to buying the second one, the technology had been sold on to Hamilton Beach. I’ll let you draw your own conclusions about where the quality went.

After my third one broke, I looked at burr grinders again. Prices had come down a lot and it wasn’t that much more for a burr unit. If I were carefree in the cash department, I would have looked at better units. As things are, I dropped roughly $50 for a Cuisinart burr grinder. When I run it, the thing sounds like an F-series fighter jet taking off and creates static electricity in the coffee grounds like a dry Arizona wind. Very tempting to have a set of ear protectors handy adjacent the coffee area. Instead, my approach is to hit the start button and immediately take the dog out for his morning pee. But aside from these defects, it does a nice, even grind and I’m happy with the resultant pour-over coffee I make with it. The grind is noticeably more even over the blade grinders.

In my now 50+ years of experience in employing only the manual pour-over method of brewing, yes, the bloom thing is important. Also important is to pour the water in a steady, thin stream from slightly on high. I recently read in this article that what I long ago learned on my own has some science behind it:

(Gift link)

The Physics of Perfect Pour-Over Coffee

So FWIW, anyway. :slight_smile:

I’ll have to try the widdershins thing.

I dunno, it was maybe performative reverse snobbery. I’d been in L.A. and halfway into the relatively nascent Good Coffee Culture there, but growing weary of its shibboleths and miscellaneous tedia. Then I felt like I couldn’t really commit to the thing once among the Big Boys and Girls in the city where it all began. I didn’t want to have to care about coffee anymore.

Moderation in all things. Tendentious trendiness is … tedious. Crap coffe is crap. Good coffee is good. Exquisite coffee is good+.

Some days I feel like a +; some days I don’t. Just like Mounds vs. Almond Joy :wink: .

Thank you, great article! I’ll try pouring from a bit higher next time. I know from experience that a slow pour is 100% required: one day when my kettle was out of commission, I slopped water inexpertly out of a saucepan, with nearly undrinkable results.

Probably a fluke, but I’ve got a Hamilton Beach stick blender that whupps the pants off both my Cuisinart and my Braun.

I have a manual burr grinder. It would take forever to grind a pound of coffee, but it’s somewhat meditative to grind enough for a cup. It’s not noisy, it wasn’t expensive, and it works very well.

Try Light Cream - somewhere between half and half and heavy cream. Been using it for a year or two now and definitely better than 1/2 & 1/2