In reply to comments made by Shodan:
Now, since you’ve had a pretty tenuous grasp on the difference between literal speech and hyperbolic or metaphorical speech throughout this thread, I can not be completely sure whether you are actually calling me a child, or if you intend to imply that my lack of anger over McGruder’s involvement in the “Not in My Name” document somehow means I share qualities with children. If it is the former, then you may wish to know that you are mistaken; I am an adult. If it is the latter, I can only say “So’s your mum,” and “I am rubber you are glue.” Oh, and “my Dad can beat up your Dad.”
The statement, which can be read here, seems to promote tolerance, peace, freedom and human rights. I can’t see any of these things being described as moral idiocy. But, if you like you can tell me why toeing the government line is somehow more moral. Just remember to explain why a citizen of my country has been made a non-person by your country, a person with neither the rights of a criminal or of a prisoner-of-war.
I’ve explained hyperbole to you. I can tutor you in the finer points of this not uncommon linguistic device, but I do require payment. If you aren’t willing to foot the bill, maybe you can just understand that this little part of McGruder’s speech has flown straight over your head, and you should just shut up about it before you look even more foolish.
They’re worth just as yours, and in the case of Aaron McGruder, a good deal more. He seems able to talk about politics with some degree of intelligence. You haven’t exhibited the ability to talk about anything with any degree of intelligence.
Well, I’ve spoken about the worth of his political opinions, and I feel that Boondocks is a well-drawn, well written cartoon that can be enjoyed by anyone, regardless of political leanings. (I mean who here doesn’t find Puffy criticism entertaining?)
Strange that you know this, but still feel the need to share yours with the world.