# What did deep throat do

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [May 31, 2005, 11:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289 "2005-05-31T23:42:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Si\_Amigo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/si_amigo/32/2877_2.png) [@Si\_Amigo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Si_Amigo)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 3:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289/21 "2005-06-01T03:21:38Z")

</div>

I don’t recall Deep Throat interviewing with “Vanity Fair”! 😛 But good cite. Made me look! 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Si\_Amigo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/si_amigo/32/2877_2.png) [@Si\_Amigo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Si_Amigo)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 3:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289/22 "2005-06-01T03:36:51Z")

</div>

> [@Si Amigo](#):
>
> I don’t recall Deep Throat interviewing with “Vanity Fair”! 😛 But good cite. Made me look! 😉

duh, he did just interview with “Vanity Fair” didn’t he. 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Reeder](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c6cbf5/32.png) [@Reeder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Reeder)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 3:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289/23 "2005-06-01T03:39:28Z")

</div>

> [@Si Amigo](#):
>
> I myself find it amazing that two, TWO jounrilist could keep this secrect for so long! Bet you couldn’t find two today that would take a matter as big as this to there (near) graves. ;j

Truth be told?

Three people knew.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![commasense](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/commasense/32/3017_2.png) [@commasense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/commasense)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 3:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289/24 "2005-06-01T03:50:57Z")

</div>

Four, including Felt himself: WP editor Ben Bradlee knew, too. (Or is that what you alluding to, **Reeder**?)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Si\_Amigo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/si_amigo/32/2877_2.png) [@Si\_Amigo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Si_Amigo)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 3:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289/25 "2005-06-01T03:58:41Z")

</div>

But did Dick know? That would make five!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rilchiam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/2bfe46/32.png) [@Rilchiam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rilchiam)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 4:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289/26 "2005-06-01T04:00:25Z")

</div>

I thought Bradlee **didn’t** know. That’s what fueled a lof of the speculation that DT was a composite: supposedly, Bradlee said, “Give me a name,” and the guy-smoking-in-a-parking-garage scenario was an invention to avoid admitting that there were several sources, not just one. As it is, I’m still not sure Bradlee knew who DT was.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Reeder](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c6cbf5/32.png) [@Reeder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Reeder)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 4:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289/27 "2005-06-01T04:04:04Z")

</div>

Bradlee did know. But he had never met Felt.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MaxTheVool](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@MaxTheVool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MaxTheVool)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 4:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289/28 "2005-06-01T04:45:17Z")

</div>

> [@Jeff Lichtman](#):
>
> The less specific he was, the less likely that someone in the White House could trace the leak back to him.

That makes very little sense to me. Suppse he’d said “G. Gordon Liddy is dirty as hell” and, from the White House perspective, Woodward and Bernstein suddenly start investigating G. Gordon Liddy. How does that lead back to any specific person any more than if he said “follow the money”, and they started following the money?  
I think being conflicted has more to do with it… but still, it’s an odd thing to do, almost split-personality. I mean, if I had confidential information and was trying to decide whether to sell out the US to an enemy, I’d either do it or not do it. If I only hinted at the information I had, that’s still just as much treason, but much less useful (assuming I wanted the US to be undercut).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jeff\_Lichtman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jeff_lichtman/32/1531_2.png) [@Jeff\_Lichtman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jeff_Lichtman)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 6:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289/29 "2005-06-01T06:39:35Z")

</div>

> [@MaxTheVool](#):
>
> That makes very little sense to me. Suppse he’d said “G. Gordon Liddy is dirty as hell” and, from the White House perspective, Woodward and Bernstein suddenly start investigating G. Gordon Liddy. How does that lead back to any specific person any more than if he said “follow the money”, and they started following the money?

Well, “Gordon Liddy is dirty as hell” is hardly a detail, and wouldn’t do Woodward much good unless he said how Liddy was dirty.

Here’s how it works: people in government are told secrets on a need-to-know basis, and they aren’t all told the same secrets. If inside information started showing up in the Post, the higher-ups (Haldeman and Erlichman probably) would figure out what had been told to whom, and would quickly narrow down their list of suspected leakers. They might even dole out little bits of information to different people to see what showed up in the papers. This is how governments catch spies. So, for example, Felt had told Woodward who had been paid how much hush money, it’s a lot more likely the leak would be traced back to him than if he just said, “follow the money.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 6:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289/30 "2005-06-01T06:53:19Z")

</div>

> [@Si Amigo](#):
>
> But did Dick know? That would make five!

He didn’t know for sure, but as it turns out, he was suspicious of the right guy.

> [@Rilchiam](#):
>
> I thought Bradlee didn’t know. That’s what fueled a lof of the speculation that DT was a composite: supposedly, Bradlee said, “Give me a name,” and the guy-smoking-in-a-parking-garage scenario was an invention to avoid admitting that there were several sources, not just one. As it is, I’m still not sure Bradlee knew who DT was.

One of the articles I read today said that Bradlee was not given Felt’s name until after Nixon resigned. But it was fairly public knowledge that Bradlee wrote “Deep Throat’s” obituary, so he had to know.

> [@eleusis](#):
>
> Well yeah, but why? Where’s the connection?

To elaborate on **pseudotriton** ’s answer, when a source tells a reporter he is speaking on “deep background,” that means “you can’t print any of what I’m telling you or identify me in any way.” So the reporter then has to use the information he’s been given to try and get another source to go on record.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eleusis](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/f4b2a3/32.png) [@Eleusis](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Eleusis)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 8:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289/31 "2005-06-01T08:05:08Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> To elaborate on **pseudotriton** ’s answer, when a source tells a reporter he is speaking on “deep background,” that means “you can’t print any of what I’m telling you or identify me in any way.” So the reporter then has to use the information he’s been given to try and get another source to go on record.

Thanks to both of you.

While I can accept this answer as factual, I can’t help but feel somewhat “cheated” as I was hoping for something much more… _sinister_…

… like Linda Lovelace, Nixon, Jimmy Hoffa gettin’ it on, in the Lincoln bedroom, on 8mm secret service surveillance tape 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chrisk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@chrisk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/chrisk)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 10:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289/32 "2005-06-01T10:23:45Z")

</div>

> [@MaxTheVool](#):
>
> That makes very little sense to me. Suppse he’d said “G. Gordon Liddy is dirty as hell” and, from the White House perspective, Woodward and Bernstein suddenly start investigating G. Gordon Liddy. How does that lead back to any specific person any more than if he said “follow the money”, and they started following the money?

Well, in that example, if two reporters suddenly start investigating Liddy, it would kind of seem likely to me that they’ve been leaked info by SOMEBODY.

If they suddenly start following the money, it could be that they’ve been leaked info, or it could be that they’re just following a fairly reasonable tack of investigation.

Which brings up another point. Was ‘follow the money’ an investigative-journalism maxim before ‘all the president’s men’ came out, or did it become so BECAUSE of the book??

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![av8rmike](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/edb3f5/32.png) [@av8rmike](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/av8rmike)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 12:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289/33 "2005-06-01T12:06:05Z")

</div>

[Gene Weingarten](http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2005/05/25/DI2005052501240.html) has always claimed he knew as well. Take with appropriate-sized amount of sodium chloride.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pseudotriton\_ruber\_ruber](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/a9a28c/32.png) [@pseudotriton\_ruber\_ruber](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pseudotriton_ruber_ruber)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 12:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289/34 "2005-06-01T12:39:03Z")

</div>

> [@chrisk](#):
>
> Was ‘follow the money’ an investigative-journalism maxim before ‘all the president’s men’ came out, or did it become so BECAUSE of the book??

WAG: I think it was a truism of investigate work beforehand, sort of a variation on “Cherchez la femme,” but because it was such a useful maxim on such a major story, “follow the money” became elevated in stature. Like “It’s the economy, stupid,” it was a case of a very simple and obvious principle working out so well that it acquired a greater status as a major truth than it already had.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cliffy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/59ef9b/32.png) [@Cliffy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cliffy)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 1:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289/35 "2005-06-01T13:04:07Z")

</div>

> [@Reeder](#):
>
> Bradlee did know. But he had never met Felt.

In an article today in The Post’s commuter paper Express, Bradlee said he didn’t know Deep Throat’s identity while the Watergate investigation was going on, but that Woodstein told him after Nixon resigned.

Also, before the Vanity Fair piece, Felt had apparently told a handful of friends and family members over the last few years. According to one article I read somewhere yesterday (at [washingtonpost.com](http://washingtonpost.com) perhaps?), Felt went public in Vanity Fair after his children, who knew, prevailed upon him to do so.

–Cliffy

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 1:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289/36 "2005-06-01T13:49:49Z")

</div>

> [@Rilchiam](#):
>
> H^H^H^H^H^

What’s “H^H^H^H^H^”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 1:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289/37 "2005-06-01T13:55:41Z")

</div>

> [@MaxTheVool](#):
>
> I think being conflicted has more to do with it… but still, it’s an odd thing to do, almost split-personality. I mean, if I had confidential information and was trying to decide whether to sell out the US to an enemy, I’d either do it or not do it. If I only hinted at the information I had, that’s still just as much treason, but much less useful (assuming I wanted the US to be undercut).

It might be less odd if you employed a better comparison. Felt’s dilemma wasn’t between either refraining from betraying his country or betraying his country. His dilemma was between exposing corruption (i.e., helping his country) on the one hand; and being exposed to condemnation and possibly retaliation by people he worked with and for (Felt was pretty much a Nixon conservative of the day). It’s like the classic whistleblower’s dilemma.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cliffy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/59ef9b/32.png) [@Cliffy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cliffy)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 2:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289/38 "2005-06-01T14:27:56Z")

</div>

Back in the days before the Web, some Telnet and newsreader clients would not accept the backspace key. So you’d type your input, realize you had a typo, backspace to the typo and correct it, and then hit enter. Your input line looked fine, with the correction in place, but when the line would post to the screen so the others on the channel could read it, you’d see the original line with the typo, H^ for every tim eyou hit the backspace key, and then the stuff you typed afterwards.

E.g., suppose I typed “Hi Bib!” then noticed the typo. I’d backspace, correct it, and retype so my input line read: “Hi Bob!” But when I hit enter, “Hi Bib!H^H^H^ob!” would appear on the screen.

Now, that symbol is used as a joke as **Reeder** did to pretend that the writer of the post typed one thing and then changed it. I guess it’s a joke that moronsH^H^H^H^H^younger folks don’t get.

😉

–Cliffy

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chrisk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@chrisk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/chrisk)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 2:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289/39 "2005-06-01T14:34:15Z")

</div>

By the way, reading Tim Noah’s piece in ‘Slate’ following the revelation, another reason that deep throat only pointed the way very generally has occured to me: it could have been, (paradoxically) a way for him to earn credibility with Woodward and Bernstein. He wasn’t telling them what they’d find, only (in a roundabout way) where to look.

> [@Woodward](#):
>
> But let me just say that this suggestion that we were being used by the intelligence community was of concern to us at the time and afterward. When somebody first wrote the article saying about me, “Wait a minute; this is somebody in an intelligence agency who doesn’t like Nixon and is trying to get him out,” I took that seriously.
> 
> The CIA is an agency with professional covert manipulators who try to alter events by deceiving people and directing them, running them like an intelligence agent. I have revisited this question of disinformation—I’d rather not go into how it was done—but I’ve satisfied myself and others that that was not the case.

(from a 1979 Playboy interview with J. Anthony Lukas)

Does this shed any light on the hints vs clear info question?? Since Felt was in the FBI, with possible motives to see Nixon kicked out, would the reporters have wondered if they were being set up as pawns if he gave away too much info??

Just a thought.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chrisk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@chrisk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/chrisk)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 2:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289/40 "2005-06-01T14:37:37Z")

</div>

> [@Cliffy](#):
>
> Now, that symbol is used as a joke as **Reeder** did to pretend that the writer of the post typed one thing and then changed it. I guess it’s a joke that moronsH^H^H^H^H^younger folks don’t get.
> 
> 😉
> 
> –Cliffy

you didn’t use enough backspaces I think, and got “myounger”

😃

[sub](Also, looks like Rilchiam used too many.)[/sub]

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-did-deep-throat-do/306289.md?page=3)
