As far as I know, the earliest story that posits something like the internet was a 1909 story, The Machine Stops, by E.M. Forster.
Most of the things that SF writers missed are things that didn’t happen based on what they saw was possible with extrapolated technology:
Nuclear power has not been widely adopted. People way back in the 50s knew that fossil fuels shouldn’t be counted on for a long-term source of portable power. The concept of fuel cells dates back to 1839, and several SF authors posited batteries/power cells charged by nuclear power, with hydrocarbons being used only for plastics.
Futuristic weapons (railguns, lasers, smart rocks from orbit) are not widespread, and the best of them are still barely practical even though the technology for them is half a century old or more.
Computer analysis of patterns is still pretty bad. I remember reading a book called David’s Sling from 1988 that — while managing to hit the mark on a lot of developments that have taken place, and a few that are still pending — posits much better fuzzy logic than we can do with processors that are so powerful that they are probably beyond what anyone would have thought possible 20 years ago.
Mass transit is not common in most of the world, and in places where it is, is based on technology that was common 100 years ago. Many, many authors thought that mass transit would be the only way to go. It didn’t take much predictive power even in the 40s and 50s to see traffic jams and usable land being eaten up by roads as a future concern. Massive moving walkways, fast trains, evacuated underground tube shuttles, and automated cars are a few of the ideas thrown out there. Instead, we have halfway decent trains in just a few nations, running between large cities. That’s about it as far as mass transit. Even the fastest trains still run on rails, making them nothing more than mature 19th century tech.
Social changes are a lot harder to hit, and almost no SF writers, hard or soft, would venture to place much weight on their predictions about society 20 or 30 years from now. They might reasonably extrapolate some patterns of behavior based on new technology, but that’s nothing more than guessing how people would use the new tools. Someone predicting a future form of music or fashion is probably going to have a worse success rate than Nostradamus. Writers smart enough to come up with good stories know that.