What did Science Fiction writers miss completly?

Highly likely, seeing all the Oz references in The Number of the Beast and his other works.

What I find interesting: none of the Sci-Fi futurists ever speculated much on the very conservative nature of society-its easy to extrapolate about Iphones and rocket ships, but why are we still laboring on with a 13th century legal system (laws written in archaic , obscure language); and our 19th century government runs amuck, wasting resources at a furious pace.

Because we’re still human.

Agreed, I’m reasonably sure Verne’s own rocket to the moon didn’t use nuclear energy.

And don’t forget Cavorite.

Now called exclusively Upsidaisium (Up), after a controversial IUPAC ruling released in tandem with the International Astronomical Union’s ‘Dwarf planet resolution’.

Fuckin’ dwarfs.

Read The Gate to Women’s Country by Sheri S. Tepper, or The Parable of the Sower by Octavia Butler, and get back to me on that.

Usually, though, SF writers don’t write SF in order to PREDICT the future, and it’s a mistake to read SF to try to figure out what the future will be like. SF writers usually have a story they want to tell about how people will react to different societies, cultures, and technologies. For instance, David Brin wrote about a society in which people have access to cloning technology in Kiln People. The clones only live about 24 hours, and if the original (rig) wants to, s/he can accept the clone’s (rox’s) memories of its life. People clone themselves in order to study, in order to have sensual experiences, and to do household chores, among other things. Brin probably doesn’t think that this sort of technology would ever exist, he’s just saying what if it DID? How would humans react? And it’s an interesting story.

And I’m beyond reasonably sure that Verne’s spaceship wasn’t a rocket.

I’m waiting for chairdogs and beddogs from Frank Herbert. I would love to sit down in a fur-lined recliner that conformed to your shape, purred, and walked itself around as needed. I don’t think he ever explained how much they poop, though.

“Oh, sorry about that, the ottoman has a bit of diarrhea and the recliner barfed up its breakfast again…”

No they’re not. In the 50s, led by the Catholic Church and Protestant social conservatives, they had a lock on all movies, TV and comic books, censoring all sorts of content, including sexual content. Check out the Hayes Code and the Comics Code Authority. They are pathetically weak compared to their power in the 1950s. I would love to hear your argument that they are more powerful nowadays.

… maybe in another thread?

Works for me.

don’t forget to link to it.

I thought I’d read everything by Asimov, but * The Dust of Death* is new to me. Can you tell me in which collection it might be available? Thanks.

I’m not the one making the extraordinary claim, I think Lemur should start the thread.