# What do we do when Iran drops the big one on...

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [July 7, 2012, 12:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485 "2012-07-07T00:42:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 12

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![al27052](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/41988e/32.png) [@al27052](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/al27052)\
**Post date:** [July 13, 2012, 6:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485/221 "2012-07-13T06:00:24Z")

</div>

> [@LonesomePolecat](#):
>
> There’s a difference between having balls and being bugfuck crazy.

Are they really _that_ crazy?

Most international Islamic terrorists are Sunni, not Shia. the Sunni have dominated Islam for 1000+ years, and they think they are, quite literally, God’s gift to the world.

Iranians are Shia. The Shia have been the spat-upon underclass in Islam for the 1000+ years, and they don’t have the arrogance/hubris, generally, that Sunni Muslims have almost by birthright.

All the 9/11 hijackers were Sunni. In fact, I don’t know of any international terrorist incidents perpetrated by Shia Muslims.

I am much more concerned about renegade groups getting some fissile material. I hope the Iranians are worried about that too, because there’s a good chance that THEY will get nuked if some terrorists gets enough of Iran’s uranium for a small bomb, and sets it off in some major city. At the very least they’d be invaded, their leaders would be jailed/executed, and their people crushed under the boot of the West.

Still, it’s not like Qaddafi’s Libya having the bomb. THAT would have been a mess waiting to happen. Libyans are Sunnis, and Qaddafi openly supported/aided terrorists.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Try2B\_Comprehensive](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/try2b_comprehensive/32/65_2.png) [@Try2B\_Comprehensive](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Try2B_Comprehensive)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2012, 2:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485/222 "2012-07-14T02:09:21Z")

</div>

> [@greenslime1951](#):
>
> Well, if you read Tom Clancy novels, every radioactive isotope has its own “signature” and the fallout from a nuclear explosion can be tested, like determining a wine’s vintage (“The Sum of All Fears”). I have no idea if this is true, but I suspect it isn’t.

I made that claim- I got it from Foreign Affairs magazine. Right now I can’t back it up any better than that, but they have been publishing for 90 years…

Any physicists or nuclear scientists want to confirm or deny this one?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Try2B\_Comprehensive](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/try2b_comprehensive/32/65_2.png) [@Try2B\_Comprehensive](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Try2B_Comprehensive)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2012, 2:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485/223 "2012-07-14T02:41:20Z")

</div>

To be precise, here’s the quote, from this [article](http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/137731/kenneth-n-waltz/why-iran-should-get-the-bomb) (most of which is behind a paywall):

> [@](#):
>
> As for the risk of a handoff to terrorists, no country could transfer nuclear weapons without running a high risk of being found out. U.S. surveillance capabilities would pose a serious obstacle, as would the United States’ impressive and growing ability to to identify the source of fissile material.

That’s it. But it stands to reason that a country which develops its own bomb will use a unique design which would leave its tell-tale signs once detonated… but I’ll have to look into it or wait for an expert to do better than that.

From the same article, on the point of the Iranians’ “madness”:

> [@](#):
>
> The first prominent concern, which undergirds many others, is that the Iranian regime is innately irrational. Despite a widespread belief to the contrary, Iranian policy is made not by “mad mullas” but by perfectly sane ayatollahs who want to survive just like any other leaders. Although Iran’s leaders indulge in inflammatory and hateful rhetoric, they show no propensity for self-destruction. It would be a grave error for policymakers in the United States and Israel to assume otherwise.
> 
> Yet that is precisely what many U.S. and Israeli officials and analysts have done. Portraying Iran as irrational has allowed them to argue that the logic of nuclear deterrence does not apply to the Islamic Republic. If Iran acquired a nuclear weapon, they warn, it would not hesitate to use it in a first strike against Israel, even though doing so would invite massive retaliation and risk destroying everything the Iranian regime holds dear.  
> …  
> Iran’s leaders did not, for example, attempt to close the Straight of Hormuz despite issuing blustery warnings that they might do so after the EU announced its planned oil embargo in January. The Iranian regime clearly concluded that it did not want to provoke what would surely have been a swift and devastating American response to such a move.

Not a slam dunk I admit, but I’d need to be persuaded that Iran’s behavior adds up to ‘insane’ and not just ‘jerks’.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![greenslime1951](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e9bcb4/32.png) [@greenslime1951](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/greenslime1951)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2012, 3:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485/224 "2012-07-14T03:48:57Z")

</div>

> [@Try2B\_Comprehensive](#):
>
> From the same article, on the point of the Iranians’ “madness”:
> 
> Not a slam dunk I admit, but I’d need to be persuaded that Iran’s behavior adds up to ‘insane’ and not just ‘jerks’.

Thanks for the article excerpt.

I do have one problem with the reasoning in it, though. If Iran’s rhetoric convinces the US/Israel that its leaders are irrational, wouldn’t its building a nuclear weapon _provoke_ attack rather than deter it? Or to put it another way, if they meant it strictly as a deterrent, wouldn’t they tone down the “destroy Israel” and “death to America” rhetoric?

I would think that if Iran truly wanted to deter an attack (nuclear or conventional) by building a nuclear device, it would do its level best to convince the world that it no longer wanted to destroy the Zionists and the Great Satan, and that its weapon(s) were for deterrence _only_.

Of course, if you assume that they are, in fact, rational, that would likely mean they are actually telling the truth when they say they are **not** building a nuclear weapon, because to do so combined with the bellicose rhetoric would absolutely invite a massive preemptive strike.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2012, 3:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485/225 "2012-07-14T03:59:23Z")

</div>

> [@greenslime1951](#):
>
> I do have one problem with the reasoning in it, though. If Iran’s rhetoric convinces the US/Israel that its leaders are irrational, wouldn’t its building a nuclear weapon _provoke_ attack rather than deter it?

No. Neither of those nations needs a provocation to attack Iran. Especially America; America is perfectly happy to attack nations that go out of their way to avoid provocations.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![greenslime1951](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e9bcb4/32.png) [@greenslime1951](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/greenslime1951)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2012, 5:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485/226 "2012-07-14T05:37:06Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> No. Neither of those nations needs a provocation to attack Iran. Especially America; America is perfectly happy to attack nations that go out of their way to avoid provocations.

Well, that’s Der Trihs America-hater logic, which differs somewhat from conventional logic.

Of course, we haven’t attacked Iran, despite having had ample reason to do so since 1979, but let’s not confuse the issue with facts.

You know, this America-as-bloodthirsty-mass-murderer thing you have going is getting kind of old; nobody other than yourself gives it any weight. Have you even _considered_ the possibility that your view might be, um, distorted?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ibn\_Warraq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/e19b73/32.png) [@Ibn\_Warraq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ibn_Warraq)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2012, 5:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485/227 "2012-07-14T05:46:19Z")

</div>

> [@al27052](#):
>
> the Sunni have dominated Islam for 1000+ years, and they think they are, quite literally, God’s gift to the world.

That’s bigoted, ignorant bullshit.

> [@](#):
>
> Iranians are Shia.

Yes, for the most part we are.

> [@](#):
>
> The Shia have been the spat-upon underclass in Islam for the 1000+ years, and they don’t have the arrogance/hubris, generally, that Sunni Muslims have almost by birthright.

That’s not to dissimilar to the talking point promulgated by Shia apologists, but it’s grossly simplistic and hardly accurate since Shia have often been rulers, have repeatedly shown that they are just as capable of arrogance and hubris particularly when discussions of the Hidden Imam come up and I’d certainly question the idea that the Sunnis are more arrogant.

> [@](#):
>
> All the 9/11 hijackers were Sunni. In fact, I don’t know of any international terrorist incidents perpetrated by Shia Muslims.

Victims of the Hezbollah would beg to differ.

> [@](#):
>
> Still, it’s not like Qaddafi’s Libya having the bomb. THAT would have been a mess waiting to happen. Libyans are Sunnis, and Qaddafi openly supported/aided terrorists.

For a variety of reasons Qaddafi was far, far less likely than the Iranians to have good relations with Islamist terrorists. In fact, I’m not sure he funded any unless you want to classify any terrorists who are Muslim as Islamic terrorists. He preferred people like Abu Nidal to Mujahids longing to become Shahids and enter paradise.

Qaddafi was also hardly a conventional Sunni I’m not sure the point of your “Libyans are Sunnis” comment and Iran has also openly supported/aided terrorists(both Sunni and Shia) to a vastly greater degree than Qaddafi ever dreamed.

I know lots of westerners make a big deal about the Sunni-Shia divide, but aside from some isolated regions, it’s not what many think.

The Iranians and their men in Lebanon(the Hezbollah) have always had excellent relations with Hamas though the former are Shia and the latter are Sunnis.

For that matter, following the triumph of the Iranian revolution Khomeini was wildly popular throughout the Arab world, including most Sunnis.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2012, 6:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485/228 "2012-07-14T06:11:57Z")

</div>

> [@greenslime1951](#):
>
> Of course, we haven’t attacked Iran, despite having had ample reason to do so since 1979, but let’s not confuse the issue with facts.

Of course we have; everything from backing Iraq against them, to funding terrorist groups in Iran. And we’ve been their enemy since long before 1979.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bumbleblee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/f0a364/32.png) [@Bumbleblee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bumbleblee)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2012, 3:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485/229 "2012-07-14T15:46:11Z")

</div>

Iran are not going to use nucear weapons if they have them. The main goal of having nuclear weapons would be to deter attacks on Iran.

They know they cant hope to win, so there is no military reason for them to start a war.

They will want to keep the weapons close to them, so they arent going to just hand them over to some random terrorist group.

No, they are not crazy despite their rhetoric (after all, listen to some of the things our politicians say). They have held on to power for almost 40 years so why would they throw all that overboard just so some armchair generals can invent a Clancy style counter attack?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![greenslime1951](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e9bcb4/32.png) [@greenslime1951](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/greenslime1951)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2012, 8:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485/230 "2012-07-14T20:04:05Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> Of course we have; everything from backing Iraq against them, to funding terrorist groups in Iran. And we’ve been their enemy since long before 1979.

Uh huh. We were _allies_ of Iran when the Shah was in power. Go look in Wikipedia and educate yourself about the cause of the 1979 hostage crisis.

And no, we haven’t attacked Iran. We also didn’t “back” either side in the Iran-Iraq war.

I suppose you’ll say that those terrorist groups we’ve been funding are enraged Jewish rabbits or something, because we haven’t sponsored any _human_ terrorist groups anywhere.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2012, 1:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485/231 "2012-07-15T01:20:01Z")

</div>

> [@greenslime1951](#):
>
> Uh huh. We were _allies_ of Iran when the Shah was in power.

And that is what made us _Iran’s_ enemy, as opposed to the Shah. Imposing him on them made us the enemy.

> [@greenslime1951](#):
>
> And no, we haven’t attacked Iran. We also didn’t “back” either side in the Iran-Iraq war.

Yes we did, and yes we did.

I suppose you’ll say that those terrorist groups we’ve been funding are enraged Jewish rabbits or something, because we haven’t sponsored any _human_ terrorist groups anywhere.  
[/QUOTE]  
Yes, we have; for example we’ve supported the MEK, a group that our own State Department classified as terrorists. But it’s OK to support terrorists as long as we are doing it, naturally.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Trinopus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/2bfe46/32.png) [@Trinopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Trinopus)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2012, 1:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485/232 "2012-07-15T01:27:42Z")

</div>

> [@greenslime1951](#):
>
> . . . We also didn’t “back” either side in the Iran-Iraq war. . . .

I know this is just a measly wikipedia cite, but at [least some evidence](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_support_for_Iraq_during_the_Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_war) suggests we did, in fact, support Iraq.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![al27052](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/41988e/32.png) [@al27052](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/al27052)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2012, 3:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485/233 "2012-07-15T03:40:15Z")

</div>

> [@Ibn\_Warraq](#):
>
> That’s bigoted, ignorant bullshit.
> 
> Yes, for the most part we are.
> 
> That’s not to dissimilar to the talking point promulgated by Shia apologists, but it’s grossly simplistic and hardly accurate since Shia have often been rulers, have repeatedly shown that they are just as capable of arrogance and hubris particularly when discussions of the Hidden Imam come up and I’d certainly question the idea that the Sunnis are more arrogant.
> 
> Victims of the Hezbollah would beg to differ.
> 
> For a variety of reasons Qaddafi was far, far less likely than the Iranians to have good relations with Islamist terrorists. In fact, I’m not sure he funded any unless you want to classify any terrorists who are Muslim as Islamic terrorists. He preferred people like Abu Nidal to Mujahids longing to become Shahids and enter paradise.
> 
> Qaddafi was also hardly a conventional Sunni I’m not sure the point of your “Libyans are Sunnis” comment and Iran has also openly supported/aided terrorists(both Sunni and Shia) to a vastly greater degree than Qaddafi ever dreamed.
> 
> I know lots of westerners make a big deal about the Sunni-Shia divide, but aside from some isolated regions, it’s not what many think.
> 
> The Iranians and their men in Lebanon(the Hezbollah) have always had excellent relations with Hamas though the former are Shia and the latter are Sunnis.
> 
> For that matter, following the triumph of the Iranian revolution Khomeini was wildly popular throughout the Arab world, including most Sunnis.

Stop calling me a bigot. You’ve already been warned once.

Hezbollah are international terrorists like Timothy McVeigh is an international terrorist. Really? Did you honestly think that even had a _small_ chance of convincing anyone?

Not that I’m a big fan of the Palestinian cause, but they’re not flying planes into buildings, either.

Dude, have you just not _heard_ of the Lockerbie bombing, or were you hoping I hadn’t? I’m asking in all seriousness. I really want to know. I doubt you’ll share that information, but I’ll ask anyway.

And yes, I can believe that the entire Arab world was celebrating after the Iranian revolution. The honeymoon ended though, didn’t it? And the sectarian hate started right where it left off.

Are you really hoping I don’t read/watch the news, or something? Dude, I know that the majority of the violence in Iraq over the last 8 years has been Sunni vs. Shia. For that matter, anybody who watches the news knows that. The same problems exist in most Arab countries. It’s like the Catholic/Protestant divide…it’s not going away. There’s too much hate and history of hate on both sides.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![al27052](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/41988e/32.png) [@al27052](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/al27052)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2012, 3:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485/234 "2012-07-15T03:42:15Z")

</div>

> [@Trinopus](#):
>
> I know this is just a measly wikipedia cite, but at [least some evidence](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_support_for_Iraq_during_the_Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_war) suggests we did, in fact, support Iraq.

I thought we supported the fact of the conflict itself, and the loss of life on both sides, and the chance to keep Iran occupied.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ibn\_Warraq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/e19b73/32.png) [@Ibn\_Warraq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ibn_Warraq)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2012, 4:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485/235 "2012-07-15T04:26:59Z")

</div>

> [@al27052](#):
>
> Stop calling me a bigot. You’ve already been warned once..

I didn’t call you a bigot. I made a comment about that part of your post which was bigoted bullshit.

> [@](#):
>
> Hezbollah are international terrorists like Timothy McVeigh is an international terrorist. Really? Did you honestly think that even had a small chance of convincing anyone?

Huh?

Are you trying to deny that Hezbollah are international terrorists? If so, you might want to talk to the victims of their bombings in Argentina.

> [@](#):
>
> Dude, have you just not heard of the Lockerbie bombing, or were you hoping I hadn’t? I’m asking in all seriousness. I really want to know. I doubt you’ll share that information, but I’ll ask anyway.

Yes, I’ve heard of it and I suspect I’m vastly more familiar with it than you. What is your point in bringing it up?

Are you under the impression that the bombers were radical Islamists?

They weren’t any more than the butchers of Munich, Mt. Scopus, or the various Palestinian nationalists who hijacked airliners throughout the 70s.

I certainly don’t think the Colonel funded people and groups viewed as terrorists and mentioned so in my post where I said

> [@](#):
>
> He preferred people like Abu Nidal to Mujahids longing to become Shahids and enter paradise.

I assume you’re familiar with who Abu Nidal was?

> [@](#):
>
> And the sectarian hate started right where it left off.

No, it didn’t.

> [@](#):
>
> Dude, I know that the majority of the violence in Iraq over the last 8 years has been Sunni vs. Shia.

No, it hasn’t been. Sunni insurgents have killed large numbers of Sunnis and Moqtada Al Sadr has had no qualms about slaughtering Shia. Yes, there’s been large amounts of sectarian deaths, but reducing it to a sectarian conflict is grossly simplistic.

> [@](#):
>
> The same problems exist in most Arab countries.

No, it’s not. The hatred between Sunnis and Shia is certainly tremendous in Iraq and a few other countries but it’s not typical.

> [@](#):
>
> It’s like the Catholic/Protestant divide..

No, it’s not. That’s an exceptionally lazy analogy that many westerners regularly make which collapses on examination.

> [@](#):
>
> There’s too much hate and history of hate on both sides.

No there’s not and not there isn’t.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![al27052](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/41988e/32.png) [@al27052](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/al27052)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2012, 5:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485/236 "2012-07-15T05:10:37Z")

</div>

Stop chopping my posts up. You are trying to create the impression that you are categorically responding, but you’re really just covering for your lack of content.

As far as Hezbollah, you’re right, they have been involved, quite possibly, in several international attacks.

However, the vast, vast majority of international terrorism is Sunni. That’s just how it is. Nobody here is dumb enough, or uninformed enough, to think otherwise.

And Qaddafi committed state-sponsored terrorism. Why even bother to dispute that?

Please realize that being from Iran gives you considerably _less_ credibility on these issues. You’re about as objective a source on this as Jerry Falwell was on Creationism, just like pretty much any other person from the Middle East. Peddle your spin to people who’ll swallow it, please.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2012, 5:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485/237 "2012-07-15T05:43:37Z")

</div>

> [@al27052](#):
>
> However, the vast, vast majority of international terrorism is Sunni.

[Naturally.](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam#Denominations)

> [@](#):
>
> The largest denomination in Islam is Sunni Islam, which makes up over 75% to 90% of all Muslims.
> 
> \<snip\>
> 
> The Shi’a constitute 10–20% of Islam and are its second-largest branch.

With such a huge disparity in numbers, it would be rather surprising if there _weren’t_ more Sunni terrorists, along with more of everything else.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ibn\_Warraq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/e19b73/32.png) [@Ibn\_Warraq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ibn_Warraq)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2012, 3:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485/238 "2012-07-15T15:52:03Z")

</div>

> [@al27052](#):
>
> Please realize that being from Iran gives you considerably _less_ credibility on these issues. You’re about as objective a source on this as Jerry Falwell was on Creationism, just like pretty much any other person from the Middle East. Peddle your spin to people who’ll swallow it, please.

That of course is another example of ignorant, racist bullshit.

You could just as easily argue that I have no credibility on this subject because I’m an American.

Do you argue that African-American posters have “less credibility” on race-related issues or that Jewish posters have “less credibility” when it comes to discussing the treatment of Jews in the Middle East or the Middle Ages?

Anyway, people will notice that I’m not playing the role of the apologist attacking him for slurring my great Shia ancestors but am pointing out that his claims about how horrible the Sunnis are and how great the Shias are are both heavily exaggerated.

There are quietists, radicals, and traditionalists among both the Shia and the Sunnis and claiming that the Sunnis are somehow more “arrogant” than the Shia or “crazier” is simply bullshit.

It’s also just the 21st Century version of the crap I heard spouted off by ignorant Americans in the 1980s about how it was the Shia who were the “crazies” and the radicals(this being the time when Shia radicals had blown up the Marine Barracks in Lebanon and taken over the US Embassy in Iran) whereas the Sunnis were the more reasonable ones.

Now, are there many countries where Sunnis and Shia don’t get along? Yes, but it’s limited to only parts of the Islamic world, it’s hardly universal.

Moreover, comparisons between the Shia-Sunnis differences and Catholic-Protestant differences are intellectually lazy and grossly simplistic.

It’s part of a long tradition of westerners trying to fit Muslims into western categories. In the Middle Ages when Christians referred to Muslims as “Mohammedans” and continued well into the late 20th Century when news reports on the Lebanese Civil War would refer to the Christian groups as “right-wingers” while the Muslim groups were referred to as “left-wingers”.

The Sunnis and Shia certainly have theological differences, but they’ve never been nearly as dramatic as the differences between the Catholics and the Protestants, they never had the religious wars that Christians had and, most importantly, they never denied each other were Muslims, denied the others could enter heaven.

They are not separate “sects” or “denominations” the way the Catholics and Protestants are, recognize clerics of each group(though obviously clerics in Islam are different than clerics in the Catholic Church) and often pray together.

The Salafists are the lone exception to the above two paragraphs, and they’re a rather recent group and were it not for the Saudi oil money and the way the West elevated the Saudis to prominence, they’d hardly be that influential.

Now, that’s not to say that in many areas where Shias and Sunnis have become sworn enemies due to tribal, though not sectarian reasons, most notably Iraq and Lebanon. However, even there, you’ll notice that Shia Iraqis while they have a long-standing rivalry which has often erupted into bloodshed with the Sunni Arabs, have gotten along very well with the Kurds, who are overwhelmingly Sunni. Similarly, people will notice that the Shia Hezbollah are staunch allies of the Sunni Hamas.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ibn\_Warraq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/e19b73/32.png) [@Ibn\_Warraq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ibn_Warraq)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2012, 3:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485/239 "2012-07-15T15:54:32Z")

</div>

> [@al27052](#):
>
> And Qaddafi committed state-sponsored terrorism. Why even bother to dispute that?

Huh?

I never denied he did. In fact, I specifically mentioned he did when I referenced Abu Nidal.

> [@](#):
>
> **Ibn Warraq**  
> He preferred people like Abu Nidal to Mujahids longing to become Shahids and enter paradise.

Did you not know who Abu Nidal was?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![greenslime1951](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e9bcb4/32.png) [@greenslime1951](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/greenslime1951)\
**Post date:** [July 15, 2012, 5:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485/240 "2012-07-15T17:57:51Z")

</div>

> [@Ibn\_Warraq](#):
>
> That of course is another example of ignorant, \*\*racist \*\*bullshit.
> 
> You could just as easily argue that I have no credibility on this subject because I’m an American.

(bolding mine)

He was criticizing your point of view as distorted because you are an Iranian. Since when is “Iranian” a race?

Don’t play the race card when it isn’t actually in your hand to begin with. Your point of view is skewed and unobjective because of your political affiliations, not because of your race.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485.md?page=11)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-we-do-when-iran-drops-the-big-one-on/627485.md?page=13)
