The statement “Next Saturday” is basically an ambiguously shortened statement:
-
It could be the shortened form of “The next Saturday to occur after today.”
-
It could also be the shortened form of “The next Saturday to occur after the next Saturday to occur after today.”
Assuming that the recipient of your comment knows what the actual day of the week is (and this assumption might very well be mistaken) and that you also know what the actual day of the week is (and this assumption might also be mistaken), then the following are likely scenarios:
A) If today is Sunday, Monday or Tuesday then many (perhaps most) people will assume you are shortening statement 1.
B) If today is Wednesday, Thursday or Friday, many (perhaps most) people will assume you are shortening statement 2.
C) If today is Saturday, almost every person will assume you are shortening statement 1.
So, in my opinion, it is best to clarify the “Next Saturday” statement. I also feel that the burden to clarify falls equally on all parties when the statement “Next Saturday” is used.
Some folks feel very strongly that their method of shortening (always 1 or always 2) is the correct and only proper method. These folks often feel that the recipient of their shortened statement is “dense” if they disagree. It might be “uncomfortable” clarifying with these folks, but should still be done.
So, to me, saying “Next Saturday” is like telling someone that “there are two groups of items, totaling six items.” This statement could, of course, mean there are two groups each consisting of 3 items. It could also mean that there are two groups, one consisting of 2 items and the other consisting of 4 items. (Let’s not even try to cover the people that think groups can consist of one item. [Or the people that believe the ‘totaling’ could be applied to the individual group quantities which means there are 2 groups of 6, obviously]) :^)
And then, holding that it really “should” be clear to all what is meant, because (pick i or ii):
i) The “norm” is to assume that groups are “differently sized” unless it is clearly stated that they are “identically sized”.
ii) The “norm” is to assume that the groups are “identically sized”, unless it is clearly stated that they are “differently sized”.
Just my two cents…