# What do YOU mean by "on the nose"?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [June 19, 2013, 12:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315 "2013-06-19T00:17:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Speaker\_for\_the\_Dead](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c77e96/32.png) [@Speaker\_for\_the\_Dead](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Speaker_for_the_Dead)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2013, 12:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315/1 "2013-06-19T00:17:49Z")

</div>

To me, the expression “on the nose” was as clear as could be. It’s actually quite descriptive in its meaning of “exactly correct.” But I’ve slowly picked up here that others use it to mean “ham-handed,” as in “the environmental + colonial messages of _Avatar_ were a little on the nose.”

How do YOU use it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Hamster\_King](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/8edcca/32.png) [@The\_Hamster\_King](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Hamster_King)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2013, 12:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315/2 "2013-06-19T00:38:34Z")

</div>

In my experience the second sense is an entertainment industry thing. It’s a professional writer term of art that’s gradually trickled out into wider usage.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2013, 12:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315/3 "2013-06-19T00:42:32Z")

</div>

“Exactly correct”. I hadn’t even heard of the other definition until this thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dropzone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dropzone/32/7515_2.png) [@dropzone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dropzone)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2013, 12:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315/4 "2013-06-19T00:53:01Z")

</div>

The second definition wouldn’t make much sense in Charades.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2013, 12:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315/5 "2013-06-19T00:53:33Z")

</div>

Aren’t those two usages the same thing? The second usage (to me) is just saying that the environmental message is so direct and unsubtle that it stands out from the movie, and thus looks ham-fisted. Likewise, dialogue where characters always say precisely what they’re thinking would appear too “on the nose”, because people don’t actually talk that way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Red\_Stilettos](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/fbc32d/32.png) [@Red\_Stilettos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Red_Stilettos)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2013, 12:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315/6 "2013-06-19T00:57:35Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Strangelove](#):
>
> Aren’t those two usages the same thing? The second usage (to me) is just saying that the environmental message is so direct and unsubtle that it stands out from the movie, and thus looks ham-fisted. Likewise, dialogue where characters always say precisely what they’re thinking would appear too “on the nose”, because people don’t actually talk that way.

I agree with the above. I’ve always taken the second usage to be derived from the first. I usually see it used with an artistic/stylistic choice that is too literal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Speaker\_for\_the\_Dead](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c77e96/32.png) [@Speaker\_for\_the\_Dead](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Speaker_for_the_Dead)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2013, 12:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315/7 "2013-06-19T00:58:46Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Strangelove](#):
>
> Aren’t those two usages the same thing? The second usage (to me) is just saying that the environmental message is so direct and unsubtle that it stands out from the movie, and thus looks ham-fisted. Likewise, dialogue where characters always say precisely what they’re thinking would appear too “on the nose”, because people don’t actually talk that way.

I think it’s largely a connotative difference. One is complimentary (“bam! Nailed it!”) and the other is critical.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dropzone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dropzone/32/7515_2.png) [@dropzone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dropzone)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2013, 12:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315/8 "2013-06-19T00:59:13Z")

</div>

Oh, I’ve heard it that other way! Usually prefaced with “a little too.” Still meaning ham-handed, but snarkier.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2013, 1:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315/9 "2013-06-19T01:01:19Z")

</div>

I can see how one derives from the other, but when you already have another way of saying the same thing that doesn’t elicit confusion over meaning, it seems stupid to use the other one.

Obviously, I’d never use the second definition, although I am aware of it being used. Hence I voted for the first. The second is just a metaphorical interpretation that should not be as popular as it is.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2013, 1:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315/10 "2013-06-19T01:05:46Z")

</div>

> [@Speaker\_for\_the\_Dead](#):
>
> I think it’s largely a connotative difference. One is complimentary (“bam! Nailed it!”) and the other is critical.

Sure. What’s good in one situation may not be good in another. If I say a statement is “on the nose,” I don’t just mean that the statement is correct, but that it was expressed so clearly and effectively that it would be difficult to misinterpret. But the same statement in a movie (say as a piece of exposition) might well appear clunky and artificial.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2013, 1:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315/11 "2013-06-19T01:14:12Z")

</div>

> [@Speaker\_for\_the\_Dead](#):
>
> I think it’s largely a connotative difference. One is complimentary (“bam! Nailed it!”) and the other is critical.

BTW, I’ve never actually heard it used as with your poll. As **dropzone** said, it’s generally prefaced by “a little too” or possibly just “too”. Also, I’ve only heard it apply to creative works, not real-life situations.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Weedy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/weedy/32/301_2.png) [@Weedy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Weedy)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2013, 5:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315/12 "2013-06-19T05:48:18Z")

</div>

I always thought the second meaning was like a bad smell, that you couldn’t get away from. Something is past its use-by date, and it stinks.

ETA: Wiktionary says this is Australian slang, might not be common in the US.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spoons](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spoons/32/3141_2.png) [@Spoons](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spoons)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2013, 6:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315/13 "2013-06-19T06:12:25Z")

</div>

I’ve only ever used it when betting horses.

“In the fifth at Churchill Downs, give me $20 on the nose, number 3.”

Translation: I’m betting $20 that horse number 3 wins the fifth race today at Churchill Downs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sandra\_nz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/eada6e/32.png) [@sandra\_nz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sandra_nz)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2013, 9:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315/14 "2013-06-19T09:33:41Z")

</div>

I would use the phrases ‘on the nose’ or ‘on the button’ to describe something that was exactly correct in a neutral or positive way.

I would use the phrase ’ a bit on the nose’ to describe something that is correct, but in a negative way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cazzle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cazzle/32/75_2.png) [@Cazzle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cazzle)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2013, 9:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315/15 "2013-06-19T09:36:33Z")

</div>

> [@Weedy](#):
>
> I always thought the second meaning was like a bad smell, that you couldn’t get away from. Something is past its use-by date, and it stinks.
> 
> ETA: Wiktionary says this is Australian slang, might not be common in the US.

This is the definition I was expecting. On the nose = suspicious, something stinks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![drewtwo99](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/d07c76/32.png) [@drewtwo99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/drewtwo99)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2013, 10:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315/16 "2013-06-19T10:07:56Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> “Exactly correct”. I hadn’t even heard of the other definition until this thread.

Couldn’t have said it better myself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![madrabbitwoman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c37758/32.png) [@madrabbitwoman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/madrabbitwoman)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2013, 10:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315/17 "2013-06-19T10:18:13Z")

</div>

stinky or suspicious. Otherwise only about horse racing

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elfkin477](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/a9a28c/32.png) [@elfkin477](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elfkin477)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2013, 10:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315/18 "2013-06-19T10:27:33Z")

</div>

> [@Speaker\_for\_the\_Dead](#):
>
> I think it’s largely a connotative difference. One is complimentary (“bam! Nailed it!”) and the other is critical.

Huh. I’ve _only_ heard it used critically.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kamino\_Neko](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kamino_neko/32/34_2.png) [@Kamino\_Neko](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kamino_Neko)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2013, 1:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315/19 "2013-06-19T13:10:22Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Strangelove](#):
>
> Aren’t those two usages the same thing? The second usage (to me) is just saying that the environmental message is so direct and unsubtle that it stands out from the movie, and thus looks ham-fisted. Likewise, dialogue where characters always say precisely what they’re thinking would appear too “on the nose”, because people don’t actually talk that way.

Yes, this, exactly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gullible\_s\_Travels](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9de0a6/32.png) [@Gullible\_s\_Travels](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gullible_s_Travels)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2013, 10:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-do-you-mean-by-on-the-nose/661315/20 "2013-06-19T22:40:24Z")

</div>

> [@Weedy](#):
>
> I always thought the second meaning was like a bad smell, that you couldn’t get away from. Something is past its use-by date, and it stinks.
> 
> ETA: Wiktionary says this is Australian slang, might not be common in the US.

Yep, this is the only definition I know. Often used when referring to a politician or political party. ‘The party is on the nose in the electorate’ means that the party is widely unpopular and/or there’s some sort of scandal going on or trying to be covered up. Seats will be lost if there’s an election looming.

‘Leader X is on the nose’ means the leader of the party is unpopular (with the people and/or with the party) and it’s time to get a new leader (which could very well be ‘on the nose’ itself, depending on the specifics surrounding any leadership challenge). Political parties can also be on the nose in some areas but sort of okay in others eg ‘Labor is on the nose in Queensland’.

I wasn’t aware of the ‘exactly correct’ type of meaning. Language is a funny thing.
