What exactly are holocaust-deniers trying to accomplish?

Relatively small compared to the other groups. From this JW site:

This was not the total extent of their persecution, though, as the site details, and still, in my opinion, stunningly significant in that they had the option of avoiding any persecution and internment at all by signing a document renouncing their religion and swearing allegiance to Nazi authority.

Jehovah’s Witnesses take pretty seriously the precept of not swearing any oath, and some at least maintain that involvement in or allegiance to politics is against their faith. They are also very pro-martyrdom as current Christian sects go.

I’m surprised there were that many JWs in the Reich, I had no idea. I suppose they don’t get mentioned often due to their general reticence to get involved in public affairs, so they aren’t out there making it known.

I think part of it is a firm belief that what actually happened was very much distorted by the allies/victors and history rewritten.

Obviously one cannot refute anecdotal assertions like these, or my own anecdotal experience that is completely different. Are there any Jewish organizations or well-known commentators or spokesmen who make documented assertions like these? I haven’t seen any.

The Holocaust does have a special place in that it was an ethnic slaughter occurring in a modern, “enlightened” Western society, employing a degree of organized brutality and singlemindedness against its main target that had not previously been seen.,

Are you directing this question to leaders of those groups?

Re Holocaust denial: do any of the individuals or groups who push this do so as a way of targeting Roma, homosexuals, Communists and the disabled? Or is it solely a means of fomenting anti-Jewish hatred?

I think you can figure out the answer to that one.

This is not true. There have been multiple other similar campaigns in the 19th and 20th centuries. Perhaps not with the degree of success, but there have been other ethnic genocides, even in the US.

The methodical, mechanised nature of the Holocaust is pretty different than most genocides. I don’t think that makes it morally different, but it makes it more shocking to Western sensibilities.

The sheer numbers as well, and let’s face it, the fact that the victims were white.

Were Jews considered white at that time? They haven’t always been. That potential hairsplitting aside, DaphneBlack’s right about why it feels like a different type of mass murder - and genocide was coined to describe the Holocaust, wasn’t it? - from the many similar crimes earlier and later in history.

Heck, it’s been going on at least since Carthago got itself delenda’ed.

Not only were Jews not considered “white”, there were often specific legal prohibitions and quotas against Jews in the United States through the early 1960s. Physicist Richard Feynman went to MIT for his undergraduate degree because Columbia had filled its “Jew quota” (nuts to them), and many of the educated Jewish refugees from Europe ended up teaching at upstart “black” colleges because traditional schools would not hire them.

As for sheer numbers, even more died in the Soviet Union and China then were executed by Germany in WWII.

Stranger

Michael Medved’s complaint about the Berlin memorial to gay holocaust victims is quoted and discussed here:

With regard to Medved, I’ve never heard him regarded as a “Jewish Spokesman” - he’s a movie critic, right-wing talk show host and self-appointed guardian of public morals. I had to look up his bio to confirm his religion.

And while his quoted remarks are stupid and bigoted, there’s no indication he falls into the “Jews hogging the Holocaust” stereotype. His problem is that he finds homosexuality repugnant; therefore in his eyes it deserves no distinctive memorial or recognition.

No German? A large percentage of the Jews and Communists and Homosexuals and disabled people that the Nazis exterminated were German. Maybe not by the Nazi definition, but certainly by any other definition.