Yes. And then the birthers said that that wasn’t good enough. They could tell, by looking at an image on the internet, that it was a forgery, as summarised by factcheck.org:
[QUOTE]
That charge leaped from the blogosphere to the mainstream media earlier this week when Jerome Corsi, author of a book attacking Obama, repeated the claim in an Aug. 15 interview with Steve Doocy on Fox News.
Corsi: Well, what would be really helpful is if Senator Obama would release primary documents like his birth certificate. The campaign has a false, fake birth certificate posted on their website. How is anybody supposed to really piece together his life?
Doocy: What do you mean they have a “false birth certificate” on their Web site?
Corsi: The original birth certificate of Obama has never been released, and the campaign refuses to release it.
Doocy: Well, couldn’t it just be a State of Hawaii-produced duplicate?
Corsi: No, it’s a – there’s been good analysis of it on the Internet, and it’s been shown to have watermarks from Photoshop. It’s a fake document that’s on the Web site right now, and the original birth certificate the campaign refuses to produce.
Corsi isn’t the only skeptic claiming that the document is a forgery. Among the most frequent objections we saw on forums, blogs and e-mails are:
[ul] [li] The birth certificate doesn’t have a raised seal.[/li]
[li] It isn’t signed.[/li]
[li] No creases from folding are evident in the scanned version.[/li]
[li] In the zoomed-in view, there’s a strange halo around the letters.[/li]
[li] The certificate number is blacked out.[/li]
[li] The date bleeding through from the back seems to say “2007,” but the document wasn’t released until 2008.[/li]
[li] The document is a “certification of birth,” not a “certificate of birth.”[/ul][/li][/QUOTE]
So then he made the certificate available for inspection at his Chicago campaign headquarters:
Recently FactCheck representatives got a chance to spend some time with the birth certificate, and we can attest to the fact that it is real and three-dimensional and resides at the Obama headquarters in Chicago. We can assure readers that the certificate does bear a raised seal, and that it’s stamped on the back by Hawaii state registrar Alvin T. Onaka (who uses a signature stamp rather than signing individual birth certificates). We even brought home a few photographs.
They then go on to discuss in detail their analysis of the document and conclude that it meets all the expected requirements of a certificate of live birth.
So, the onus is very much on the birthers to produce some evidence. They’ve not done so. Really, it’s starting to sound like St. Thomas - unless each and every single birther gets to handle the certificate himself, there’s “doubts” about Mr. Obama’s birth. :rolleyes: