If you need formally directing to it, then here it is.
I don’t want a post reviewed, The post in question in not something that bothers me but it is clearly in violation of the multiple notes you attached to the thread. The post isn’t a problem, the double standard being applied by the moderation, is.
I’m simply requesting some clarity on why it was not considered by you to be a continuation of a hijack and no comment passed on it and yet mine (which was far more on topic) was, and worthy of immediate suspension from the thread.
What about that response to me made it not a continuation of the hijack? Because it clearly was nothing to do with the on-topic discussion on residuals which you are happy with.
Was it the length?
Was it the fact that they added some on-topic content as well?
Was it the that you are not aware of it? (now you are)
Was it that a formal complaint was not made?
Is there a factor that I’m not seeing which made you throw me out and not them?
As did they, and even worse because by then there were even more notices on the thread that you are confident they must have seen and ignored.