What happened to Bricker?

[snoe]

LHOD said it much better in the other thread.

@Left_Hand_of_Dorkness

But that’s ridiculous. First, if that’s your purpose, just say that shit, don’t challenge people to recreate the arguments that the courts have already heard and accepted multiple times. Second, instead of saying, “What do the courts say it means?” how about you read what these courts say it means?

If you think those court rulings will not hold up (and I agree, but not because the arguments are weak, because our courts are almost fatally politicized, viz., the destruction of the Voting Rights Act that led to similar shenanigans in the first place), it’s be far more interesting for you to quote specific arguments that the court accepted and explain why you reject them.

The game you’re playing now just looks like you’re trying to force people to cite things you can easily access yourself, on the assumption that if they, with a layperson’s knowledge and resources, cite them incorrectly, you can mock them for their ignorance, and claim victory without actually making any substantive arguments of your own.