They also get placed at Kinko’s and Boston Market quite a bit from what I’ve observed; but perhaps that is just a local office thing.
If you haven’t already, this is a must-read O. Henry short story:
I believe it is not usually the case that he would serve the whole sixty years. Assuming ten years per conviction, unless the judge specified that the sentences run consecutively, in some states at least you are eligible for parole after two thirds of your sentence. If his sentences run concurrently, that would be less than seven years.
Regards,
Shodan

Good point. My apologies to Susanann.
Apology accepted.
The longest sentence I personally saw where somebody was released was just over thirty years. But that’s a rare exception. The reality is that once you get past twenty or twenty-five years, you’re going to die in prison. Prison ages you fast. I’ve seen prisoners in their forties who looked like sixty year olds and sixty year olds who looked like they were ninety.
Based on street statistics, a twenty-five year old sent to prison for sixty years would have a good chance of being released. But realistically, he’ll be dead before he’s seventy.

I believe it is not usually the case that he would serve the whole sixty years. Assuming ten years per conviction, unless the judge specified that the sentences run consecutively, in some states at least you are eligible for parole after two thirds of your sentence. If his sentences run concurrently, that would be less than seven years.
Regards,
Shodan
I just found a website to get public information about inmates. I looked him up and found that he will be eligible for his first parole hearing in 2029, and that his maximum release date is in 2059 - so he is definitely serving these consecutively.
When you say he recieved “10 years for each count,” do you mean he received six 10 year sentences, or one or more 60 year sentences? A parole eligibility date of 2029 sounds more like the latter. If he was serving six consecutive 10 year sentences he’d have to serve 50 years flat before he was eligible for parole, but one or more 60 year concurrent sentences on an aggravated sexual assault of a child case would mean parole eligibilty after 30 years - with an aggravated offense you have to serve either half of your sentence or 30 years to be parole eligible, whichever is less.

When you say he recieved “10 years for each count,” do you mean he received six 10 year sentences, or one or more 60 year sentences? A parole eligibility date of 2029 sounds more like the latter. If he was serving six consecutive 10 year sentences he’d have to serve 50 years flat before he was eligible for parole, but one or more 60 year concurrent sentences on an aggravated sexual assault of a child case would mean parole eligibilty after 30 years - with an aggravated offense you have to serve either half of your sentence or 30 years to be parole eligible, whichever is less.
Yeah - my initial statement about 10 years for each count was heresay from when we were talking about him. Now that I’ve actually looked up his records I can see that it’s actually 3 seperate incidents. The first is the most severe where he committed 3 offenses, 2 of those offenses have 60 year sentences, one has a 20 year sentence. The other 2 incidents each have only one offense and he received 20 years for each of those. So Shodan was right, he is clearly serving all of these sentences at the same time.