A good friend, who’s been unemployed for about two years, was recently hospitalized for about a week with heart problems. His bill is over $50k USD. I’m quite sure that would have been at least a year’s *gross *pay for him, even when he was still working. It’s still up in the air how much he’ll actually have to pay; he recently got on disability due to other health issues, but he also has some money left in savings that he’s been living off of while looking for a new job, so he may not be eligible for government-provided health care coverage.
When I had a pulmonary embolism two years ago, I was in the hospital for about two days (ER and then ICU, just for the telemetry). IIRC, the total bills were about $15,000 USD; fortunately, I had health insurance at the time, so I was only responsible for less than 10% of that total.
Not all policies have a lifetime maximum; most lifetime maxes I’ve seen are around the $2M range; and IIRC one of the benefits of healthcare reform is that lifetime maximum benefits on essential care will be against the law, so those will all go away if they haven’t already.
Base costs vary wildly from provider to provider, and there’s no good way to compare them. The tools are* just now *starting to be built to allow people to “comparison shop” for procedures they can plan for.
Then, on top of that, plans tend to be structured *very *differently, with different kinds and levels of coverage. Copays, coinsurance, deductibles, lifetime maximums, out-of-pocket maximums, and premiums all factor into how much even a person *with *insurance will pay for care they’re given. Individual insurers also all negotiate separately for their costs with each provider, so costs can even vary between similar plans from different providers.
Except that there are systems currently active that are demonstrably better than the U.S. one (better outcomes at a lower cost). So that analogy doesn’t work at all.