I now see Captain Amazing making about the same point, but:
There were about 400,000 Jews in Palestine at the start of World War II. I don’t know exactly how many of them had come, since the start of Zionism around 1880, from places in Europe where they probably would have been killed. But, very roughly, I think that it was maybe half. Let’s say that two-thirds of them would have been killed by Hitler, since about 2/3 of Europe’s Jews were killed by Hitler. So, then, Zionism saved maybe, say, 130,000 Jews.
I don’t think it would go over too well with him to call that nothing.
He also might not have thought that Israel taking in most of the Jewish population, expelled from Arab countries as colonialism faded, was nothing.
You could balance that against 100,000 people killed in Arab-Israeli Wars. But I wouldn’t, because if not for Zionism, the non-Zionist Jewish population of Palestine would have been thoroughly massacred by now. One thing not taken into account, in these kinds of discussions, is that there were massacres, in Palestine, before Zionism.
There are other historical figures, associated with national liberation movements, you could tell things to. You could tell George Washington that separating from Britain would embolden the Germans to attack Western Europe and Russia in the two highest death toll European wars of all time, with America required to belatedly come to the rescue both times with great loss of life.
I could argue that Americans have less right to most of the land in the United States than do the Israelis in Israel. Or is it OK because native Americans, who still controlled big areas of the American west when my grandparents were born, were more thoroughly defeated than the Arabs?