# What if somebody DID shoot Bigfoot?

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708
**Category:** Factual Questions
**Created:** [January 13, 2014, 9:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708 "2014-01-13T21:17:15Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![gytalf2000](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/ac91a4/32.png) [@gytalf2000](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gytalf2000)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2018, 5:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708/81 "2018-12-20T17:15:19Z")

</div>

> [@gytalf2000](#):
>
> The person who did the shooting would ultimately be seen as doing science a favor, though, if he indeed provided the body to a university – providing confirmation of a heretofore unknown primate. It would be the discovery of the century! Surely the hunter would be exempted from prosecution. I dunno!
> 
> After official confirmation of the species, the second person who shot one would be in a load of trouble, I think…

Excellent point!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2018, 6:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708/82 "2018-12-20T18:28:00Z")

</div>

> [@Darren\_Garrison](#):
>
> Update: [someone recently nearly shot Bigfoot](https://www.idahostatesman.com/news/nation-world/national/article223287195.html). The primate in question insists that he isn’t Bigfoot, but that sounds exactly like what Bigfoot would say.

I hope Bigfoot reads that article, apparently he just needs to start wearing a bright orange jacket and people will stop shooting at him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2018, 7:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708/83 "2018-12-20T19:42:24Z")

</div>

Aside, from something I learned from another SDMB thread: The actor playing Chewbacca did, in fact, have to wear a high-visibility vest while on location and not filming, precisely so that he wouldn’t get mistaken for Bigfoot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![BubbaDog](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bubbadog/32/333_2.png) [@BubbaDog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BubbaDog)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2018, 7:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708/84 "2018-12-20T19:55:07Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Aside, from something I learned from another SDMB thread: The actor playing Chewbacca did, in fact, have to wear a high-visibility vest while on location and not filming, precisely so that he wouldn’t get mistaken for Bigfoot.

This reminds me of a situation my environmental engineer friend encountered. He was wearing a white hazmat suit while collecting samples of water every 100 feet in a stream that had been polluted by a hog farm water runoff.

He heard several gunshots in the distance while working.

He told me that since it was deer season and he was wearing a white suit he thought he would be OK.

Then he realized that it only took one idiot with a deer rifle and a wish to be the first guy to bag a space alien and he’d end up dead.

Packed up his test kit and got the hell out of there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![doorhinge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/a5b964/32.png) [@doorhinge](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/doorhinge)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2018, 9:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708/85 "2018-12-20T21:01:54Z")

</div>

> [@BubbaDog](#):
>
> This reminds me of a situation my environmental engineer friend encountered. He was wearing a white hazmat suit while collecting samples of water every 100 feet in a stream that had been polluted by a hog farm water runoff.
> 
> He heard several gunshots in the distance while working.
> 
> He told me that since it was deer season and he was wearing a white suit he thought he would be OK.
> 
> Then he realized that it only took one idiot with a deer rifle and a wish to be the first guy to bag a space alien and he’d end up dead.
> 
> Packed up his test kit and got the hell out of there.

They are called White-tailed Deer for a reason. When white-tailed deer are spooked, they lift their tails, exposing the white underside of their tail, and the white hair running down both legs of their back side, and run away. White-tailed deer also raise their white tails when they poop. And they poop a lot.

White-tailed deer hunters look for antlers, brown outlines, and white tails. Who ever told your friend to wear white, in the woods, during white-tailed deer season, probably doesn’t like him very much. just sayin’

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Hari\_Seldon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hari_seldon/32/5173_2.png) [@Hari\_Seldon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hari_Seldon)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2018, 10:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708/86 "2018-12-20T22:44:45Z")

</div>

Serious question. Someone above claimed that killing a mammal not an official game species was illegal in Maine. Does this mean that setting a mousetrap is a crime there?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Omar\_Little](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/omar_little/32/269_2.png) [@Omar\_Little](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Omar_Little)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2018, 10:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708/87 "2018-12-20T22:51:03Z")

</div>

> [@kk\_fusion](#):
>
> Suppose a surviving individual of a hominid sideline, so far unknown to science, is found and deliberately killed by a **licensed** hunter.

Why is this important to include? Hunter’s receive licenses to kill certain numbers and breeds of animals, such as deer, ducks, pheasants, etc. within certain time periods. There is no general hunting license that permits hunters to kill animals at will.

Well unless you are killing as a part of the hunger games, and then it’s a completely different situation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Omar\_Little](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/omar_little/32/269_2.png) [@Omar\_Little](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Omar_Little)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2018, 10:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708/88 "2018-12-20T22:56:12Z")

</div>

On a separate note, it’s a shame no one has verified the existence of bigfoot yet. It may require that nearly every human being on the earth to carry around a high definition camera and video camera on their person at all times so that when bigfoot does appear, then actual photographic and or video evidence could be obtained. Until our society is ready to be that prepared, we’ll only have vague eyewitness accounts of bigfoot sightings.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![DPRK](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4491bb/32.png) [@DPRK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DPRK)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2018, 11:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708/89 "2018-12-20T23:11:39Z")

</div>

> [@Hari\_Seldon](#):
>
> Serious question. Someone above claimed that killing a mammal not an official game species was illegal in Maine. Does this mean that setting a mousetrap is a crime there?

I don’t know about this (I would assume that mice, rats and bats are not protected wildlife?), but, in response to some of the comments above, surely it must be highly illegal to unload the old elephant gun on a target that you don’t even know what it is-- Bigfoot, a guy in a fancy dress, whatever.

Now I am no professional zoologist, but [according to Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marleyimyia_xylocopae) there is a real-life example of identifying a species without bagging a zoological holotype, though according to the article it appears to be controversial. Either way, it would not be done by some random drunken idiot. (“Wabbit season! — Duck season!”)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![bob\_2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bob_2/32/3341_2.png) [@bob\_2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bob_2)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2018, 11:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708/90 "2018-12-20T23:37:53Z")

</div>

> [@Omar\_Little](#):
>
> On a separate note, it’s a shame no one has verified the existence of bigfoot yet. It may require that nearly every human being on the earth to carry around a high definition camera and video camera on their person at all times so that when bigfoot does appear, then actual photographic and or video evidence could be obtained. Until our society is ready to be that prepared, we’ll only have vague eyewitness accounts of bigfoot sightings.

I see that two-thirds of the world population does already carry a camera, [Mobile phone users worldwide 2015-2020 | Statista](https://www.statista.com/statistics/274774/forecast-of-mobile-phone-users-worldwide/) many of them high-definition, so the mere fact that there are no photographs extant of these mythical creatures would seem to be a good indicator that they do not exist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mmmiiikkkeee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/edb3f5/32.png) [@mmmiiikkkeee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mmmiiikkkeee)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2018, 11:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708/91 "2018-12-20T23:39:37Z")

</div>

> [@Omar\_Little](#):
>
> Why is this important to include? … There is no general hunting license that permits hunters to kill animals at will.

Probably because it gives legitimacy to the person being out on public land with a loaded firearm with killin’ on his mind, differentiating that person from a crazed drunk on a shooting spree. Also, there are situations in which a hunter might have to shoot a non-licence animal. Being charged by a bear protecting cubs or a kill comes to mind… and what if the bear turned out to be a bigfoot instead? That person would probably be looked at much more favorably than an escaped prisoner who’s shooting at anything human-looking with a stolen hand gun while running away.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2018, 11:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708/92 "2018-12-20T23:50:21Z")

</div>

And that’s worldwide: It’s probably much higher for Americans.

But I’m pretty sure that **Omar** was being facetious.

EDIT:

Oh, and most states have a category for “vermin” animals, which can be killed at will whenever encountered (though there might be other relevant laws, such as discharging firearms within city limits). Mice would be a typical example.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Sigene](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/df788c/32.png) [@Sigene](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sigene)
#### Post date: [December 22, 2018, 7:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708/93 "2018-12-22T19:08:19Z")

</div>

> [@Hari\_Seldon](#):
>
> Serious question. Someone above claimed that killing a mammal not an official game species was illegal in Maine. Does this mean that setting a mousetrap is a crime there?

I’m familiar with Game officials in a state where they do something similar. First rule in the book is that shooting all animals is illegal except for those subsequently listed and with the specified allowable dates. Technically, they start by defaulting everything to be illegal, then walk that back with rules. So if it isn’t mentioned in the rule book to be ok, it is defaulted to being illegal. It would appear that killing a mouse would be illegal.

No one has ever been prosecuted for that though. But, I don’t like that mentality and I wonder if it would hold up to constitutional challenge if a case were brought up.

Other states I’ve lived in go by the idea that if its not in the book than it defaults to being legal.

Anecdote: Years ago, I didn’t know if it was ok to kill chipmunks in my garden. I called fish and game. They looked…nothing says that it is illegal so I’m fine. BUT…in the other state…since it doesn’t specifically say that killing chipmunks is allowed, it would be illegal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)
#### Post date: [December 22, 2018, 7:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708/94 "2018-12-22T19:14:34Z")

</div>

> [@bob\_2](#):
>
> I see that two-thirds of the world population does already carry a camera, [Mobile phone users worldwide 2015-2020 | Statista](https://www.statista.com/statistics/274774/forecast-of-mobile-phone-users-worldwide/) many of them high-definition, so the mere fact that there are no photographs extant of these mythical creatures would seem to be a good indicator that they do not exist.

I think you were whooshed. This is precisely what Omar meant.

Obligatory xkcd reference:

> **[Settled](https://xkcd.com/1235/)**
>
> Well, we've really only settled the question of ghosts that emit or reflect visible light. Or move objects around. Or make any kind of sound. But that covers all the ones that appear in Ghostbusters, so I think we're good.

And supplementary obligatory note that _absence of evidence is not evidence of absence_ is a stupid aphorism, because it’s so widely misunderstood and misapplied. To the contrary, when a hypothesis predicts that we should _expect_ see evidence, then absence of evidence may be compelling evidence that the hypothesis is false (i.e. evidence of absence).

> **[Evidence of absence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence)**
>
> Evidence of absence is evidence of any kind that suggests something is missing or that it does not exist. What counts as evidence of absence has been a subject of debate between scientists and philosophers. It is often distinguished from absence of evidence.
> Evidence of absence and absence of evidence are similar but distinct concepts. This distinction is captured in the aphorism "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence." This antimetabole is often attributed to Martin Rees or Carl Sagan...

Carl Sagan meant well in promoting the aphorism in situations where it does apply, but unfortunately did more harm than good, I think.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Sangahyando](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f14d63/32.png) [@Sangahyando](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sangahyando)
#### Post date: [December 23, 2018, 10:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708/95 "2018-12-23T10:08:33Z")

</div>

> [@TSBG](#):
>
> I’m polluting the thread a little, but I recall reading a scifi story–almost certainly first published in Asimov’s Science Fiction–about an alternate universe in which the Americas was populated not by other humans, but by a relict group of hominids with rather lesser intelligence than homo sapiens, but beyond that of the great apes. A legal and ethical controversy raged and–SPOILER!–it turns out interbreeding is possible.
> 
> Anyone got info on this? My patented Lazy Google turned up nothing.

Have only just noticed this post from 2017. Could the work concerned, be _A Different Flesh_ by Harry Turtledove? I have not actually read same; but I understand that it’s a collection of short stories, all by Turtledove: set at various times over the span of the seventeenth to the twentieth century. Premise of the work is that the Americas – discovered by Europeans at approximately the same date as in “real history” – were inhabited not by homo sapiens; but by homo erectus (referred to by the European colonists, as “sims”), plus sundry megafauna which in “real history” were exterminated pre-colonisation, by the h. sapiens Native Americans.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Sigene](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/df788c/32.png) [@Sigene](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sigene)
#### Post date: [December 23, 2018, 4:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708/96 "2018-12-23T16:04:25Z")

</div>

I haven’t read all the responses, but no one has seemed to brought up the idea of “How can you PROVE, the bigfoot was human enough?” You can’t prove this newly discovered dead critter was sentient or more intelligent than a dog, squirrel, horse, monkey, or mouse.

So I don’t think you can charge someone with murder in the human sense if you can’t prove this critter was in that class of organism. There may be other charges, but homicide seems right out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)
#### Post date: [December 23, 2018, 4:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708/97 "2018-12-23T16:31:11Z")

</div>

> [@Sigene](#):
>
> …“How can you PROVE, the bigfoot was human enough?” You can’t prove this newly discovered dead critter was sentient or more intelligent than a dog, squirrel, horse, monkey, or mouse.

Sure you can. The first thing we’d do if someone _really_ encountered a new ape-like species would be to sequence its genome, which would show its phylogeny.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Sigene](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/df788c/32.png) [@Sigene](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sigene)
#### Post date: [December 23, 2018, 4:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708/98 "2018-12-23T16:43:13Z")

</div>

> [@Riemann](#):
>
> Sure you can. The first thing we’d do if someone _really_ encountered a new ape-like species would be to sequence its genome, which would show its phylogeny.

Cool…so maybe its a new primate (or a weird kangaroo); killing primates is not homicide. As far as I know, DNA of newly discovered organisms cannot prove sentience. Only if the DNA proves that its human, can you bring homicide charges…but then if its human, its not bigfoot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)
#### Post date: [December 23, 2018, 4:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708/99 "2018-12-23T16:55:09Z")

</div>

> [@Sigene](#):
>
> As far as I know, DNA of newly discovered organisms cannot prove sentience.

The genome sequence can show its phylogeny with absolute certainty. When you know its relationship to other living species, and its evolutionary divergence time, you can make strong inferences about its sentience and intelligence. It might show that it’s a type of kangaroo. Or it might show that it’s a close relative to humans that diverged from the human lineage half a million years ago.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Sigene](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/df788c/32.png) [@Sigene](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sigene)
#### Post date: [December 23, 2018, 5:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708/100 "2018-12-23T17:50:13Z")

</div>

> [@Riemann](#):
>
> The genome sequence can show its phylogeny with absolute certainty. When you know its relationship to other living species, and its evolutionary divergence time, you can make strong inferences about its sentience and intelligence. It might show that it’s a type of kangaroo. Or it might show that it’s a close relative to humans that diverged from the human lineage half a million years ago.

but still does not prove sentience. Or enough to convict of “homicide”

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-somebody-did-shoot-bigfoot/678708.md?page=6)
