What if the Spanish Revolution had survived?

Sam, do you have a cite for this? I’ve never seen any indicator that Allende was planning a self coup and was going to suspend free elections or anything of the sort. I suspect that had the coup not occurred, he would have lost the next election if the economy had continued to decline.

I don’t think that his economic policies would have helped Chile but there is nothing indicating that they would have wound up like North Korea, Vietnam, or Cuba.

Here’s a thread I ran in 2006, when Pinochet died, debating his legacy, and whether Chile would have been better or worse off if he had never seized power.

From the same time, a thread on the role of Kissinger/Nixon/the CIA in Pinochet’s coup d’etat.

Here’s some interesting background from An Incomplete Education, thought it’s really about the War, not the Revolution:

One thing a lot of people forget (or didn’t know) was that Franco was not the original leader of the Nationalist forces. Their original leader was General Jose Sanjurjo until he was killed in a plane crash three days into the revolt. With Sanjurjo dead, Franco and another general, Emilio Mola, split the command of the Nationalist forces. Then Mola in turn was killed in a plane accident a few months later and Franco became the undisputed leader.

The convenience of these deaths caused rumors that Franco might have had a hand in one or both of them. But the evidence appears to be that they were genuine accidents.

Getting back to the OP: It’s interesting that these so-called “anarchists,” though often in conflict with the Republican state, made no effort to overthrow it. Rather, they seem to have just done an end-run around it, reorganizing society on the ground they way they wanted without a by-your-leave.