# What if women ruled the world?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [August 1, 2011, 1:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992 "2011-08-01T01:38:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Flying\_Dutchman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/9fc348/32.png) [@The\_Flying\_Dutchman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Flying_Dutchman)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2011, 9:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992/81 "2011-08-01T21:29:58Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> Now, it is true that testosterone is linked to greater aggression. But that only matters when it comes to some kinds of impulsive aggression, not what we are talking about here. A lack of testosterone might make female soldiers less prone to getting into bar fights, but it won’t keep them from shooting someone when told to do so. It won’t keep some woman in an office somewhere from giving the orders to bomb someone or to shoot dissenters.
> 
> And that’s what history shows; women in power have been perfectly willing to engage in conflict, and female soldiers are perfectly willing to kill. [Lyudmila Pavlichenko](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyudmila_Pavlichenko) for example was a Soviet sniper with 309 kills to her credit; that’s pretty ferocious if you ask me.

In modern warfare, where soldiers are paid by the government and not allowed to rape and pillage the inducement is much the same for both sexes.

But back in the old days, women were highly valued spoils of war. Not much inducement there for a woman soldier.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2011, 9:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992/82 "2011-08-01T21:34:55Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Flying\_Dutchman](#):
>
> In modern warfare, where soldiers are paid by the government and not allowed to rape and pillage the inducement is much the same for both sexes.
> 
> But back in the old days, women were highly valued spoils of war. Not much inducement there for a woman soldier.

And back in the old pillaging days as long as her side was winning, a woman could just stay home and let her man bring home the swag with no risk to her.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KaffeeKater](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/b4bc9f/32.png) [@KaffeeKater](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KaffeeKater)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2011, 9:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992/83 "2011-08-01T21:39:58Z")

</div>

> [@Lust4Life](#):
>
> If thats not the case, are you saying that most other males are your inferiors, because they can’t emulate your caring, sharing outlook ?

Reminds me of those kind of atheists who claim that religion is sooooo indispensable because unfortunately most other people are much dumber and weaker as themselves.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Second\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/bbe5ce/32.png) [@The\_Second\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Second_Stone)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2011, 9:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992/84 "2011-08-01T21:52:02Z")

</div>

What makes you people think that women don’t rule the world? They do, and they are usually smart enough to delegate all the heavy lifting duties to those cute men in suits that they have fronting for them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2011, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992/85 "2011-08-01T22:05:27Z")

</div>

I’m reminded of that new _Outer Limits_ episode where David Keith is a military officer who wakes up from suspended animation into a post-apocalyptic world where germ warfare has wiped out anyone with a Y chromosome, and his presence has all kinds of destabilizing effects on the women-only tribe he first meets. For some bizarre reason, he actually lets himself get drawn into their petty internal conflicts instead of saying, as I would, “Y’know, I have education and training and physical strength _and a penis_ and if you ladies are all kerfuffled by my existence, I’m just gonna go find another tribe that appreciates me. It’s not like I owe you bunch any particular loyalty just because you were the first group I met, so if you’re gonna get all bitchy on me, I’m outta here. Bye.”

So, anyway, I don’t see how a woman-run society would be better.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panaccione](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/94ad74/32.png) [@panaccione](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panaccione)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2011, 11:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992/86 "2011-08-01T23:30:47Z")

</div>

Wow, I got so many replies I don’t even know where to start.

As far as women being less violent, I don’t have what you would call a “cite” to back it up, but to me it’s obvious. Men are more violent, by and large, and this is a problem. You can point out examples of women who can be just as violent, but on the grand scheme of things, there is no comparison.

Now, I also think it’s safe to say that society has been mostly male dominated and we have always fought. Huge problem. How can we get anywhere if we keep fucking each other up?

Now, women never really have had a majority of the power in this world, and that might stay that way because the men ain’t giving it up. So my question is do you think that the fighting would stop if women ran the world? If not, what’s the solution?  
P.s. In my utopia, women would run things and men can play sports to entertain them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2011, 11:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992/87 "2011-08-01T23:40:13Z")

</div>

> [@Scotty Mo](#):
>
> As far as women being less violent, I don’t have what you would call a “cite” to back it up, but to me it’s obvious. Men are more violent, by and large, and this is a problem. You can point out examples of women who can be just as violent, but on the grand scheme of things, there is no comparison.

Men doing the fighting because they take the jobs that require it isn’t the same as men being inherently more violent. As has been pointed out again and again, there’s no evidence that when put into a position of making the decision whether to fight or not that women are less violently inclined.

And for that matter, violence isn’t inherently wrong. Sometimes it’s necessary.

> [@Scotty Mo](#):
>
> So my question is do you think that the fighting would stop if women ran the world? If not, what’s the solution?

No it wouldn’t, and I doubt there’s a solution as long as humans stay human.

> [@Scotty Mo](#):
>
> P.s. In my utopia, women would run things and men can play sports to entertain them.

And how is this more of a utopia than men running things and having dancing girls entertain them?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DocCathode](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/doccathode/32/18773_2.png) [@DocCathode](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DocCathode)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2011, 11:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992/88 "2011-08-01T23:48:27Z")

</div>

> [@Scotty Mo](#):
>
> Now, I also think it’s safe to say that society has been mostly male dominated and we have always fought.

You have any shred of evidence that one causes the other?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panaccione](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/94ad74/32.png) [@panaccione](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panaccione)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2011, 11:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992/89 "2011-08-01T23:49:06Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> Men doing the fighting because they take the jobs that require it isn’t the same as men being inherently more violent. As has been pointed out again and again, there’s no evidence that when put into a position of making the decision whether to fight or not that women are less violently inclined.
> 
> And for that matter, violence isn’t inherently wrong. Sometimes it’s necessary.
> 
> No it wouldn’t, and I doubt there’s a solution as long as humans stay human.
> 
> And how is this more of a utopia than men running things and having dancing girls entertain them?

A lot of what you said there makes sense to me except for the violence being not necessarily wrong. I believe there’s a difference between violence and defense. Defense is only necessary if violence is present. With an absence of violence, you get cooperation and that’s what’s necessary.

Also, there is room for girls who just wanna dance in my utopia.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2011, 11:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992/90 "2011-08-01T23:52:25Z")

</div>

> [@Scotty Mo](#):
>
> A lot of what you said there makes sense to me except for the violence being not necessarily wrong. I believe there’s a difference between violence and defense.

That’s just playing word games. Violence is still violence when it’s justified by self defense and so on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panaccione](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/94ad74/32.png) [@panaccione](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panaccione)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2011, 11:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992/91 "2011-08-01T23:55:38Z")

</div>

> [@DocCathode](#):
>
> You have any shred of evidence that one causes the other?

Jeez I already said I don’t have a “cite” and I’m not looking one up either. What is this debate class?

However, I’ll try to answer the question. Since both of the above mentioned are indisputable facts I would say there is a correlation there. What do you think causes all the violence.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panaccione](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/94ad74/32.png) [@panaccione](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panaccione)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2011, 11:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992/92 "2011-08-01T23:57:46Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> That’s just playing word games. Violence is still violence when it’s justified by self defense and so on.

Well then why is there a need for different terms ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DocCathode](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/doccathode/32/18773_2.png) [@DocCathode](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DocCathode)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2011, 11:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992/93 "2011-08-01T23:58:05Z")

</div>

> [@Scotty Mo](#):
>
> Jeez I already said I don’t have a “cite” and I’m not looking one up either. What is this debate class?

No, but is the Great Debates forum and we have standards here.

> [@](#):
>
> However, I’ll try to answer the question. Since both of the above mentioned are indisputable facts I would say there is a correlation there.

Correlation does not equal causation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2011, 11:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992/94 "2011-08-01T23:59:55Z")

</div>

> [@Scotty Mo](#):
>
> Well then why is there a need for different terms ?

So our language can distinguish between justified and unjustified violence of course.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OneMissedPost](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/8e7dd6/32.png) [@OneMissedPost](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OneMissedPost)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2011, 12:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992/95 "2011-08-02T00:05:10Z")

</div>

> [@Scotty Mo](#):
>
> Jeez I already said I don’t have a “cite” and I’m not looking one up either. What is this debate class?

Then, where in the world are you getting your information? I am more likely to believe someone that has literature to back up arguments/points. We need you to cite so there is some substance to what you are saying. Without any substance, you do not have an argument.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panaccione](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/94ad74/32.png) [@panaccione](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panaccione)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2011, 12:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992/96 "2011-08-02T00:06:17Z")

</div>

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> So our language can distinguish between justified and unjustified violence of course.

So your saying they’re one in the same. Then what’s the difference between one guy sucker punching another for no reason than he’s having a bad day and the other guy taking recourse so as not to be harmed?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KaffeeKater](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/b4bc9f/32.png) [@KaffeeKater](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/KaffeeKater)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2011, 12:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992/97 "2011-08-02T00:08:11Z")

</div>

> [@Scotty Mo](#):
>
> P.s. In my utopia, women would run things and men can play sports to entertain them.

Err … is it possible that your desire for a female-led world is based on a sexual fetish? :dubious: Your utopia, your female-led world in which men are only good enough to entertain superior women, sounds exactly like the utopia of those submissive “female-led relationship” guys. And … well, at least you wouldn’t be the first who made the mistake to make an ideology or a lifestyle out of their sexual preferences.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panaccione](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/94ad74/32.png) [@panaccione](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panaccione)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2011, 12:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992/98 "2011-08-02T00:08:59Z")

</div>

> [@OneMissedPost](#):
>
> Huh?
> 
> Then, where in the world are you getting your information? I am more likely to believe someone that has literature to back up arguments/points. We need you to cite so there is some substance to what you are saying. Without any substance, you do not have an argument.

Well I don’t really have the time for that, sorry. Why can’t you just take my word for it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DocCathode](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/doccathode/32/18773_2.png) [@DocCathode](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DocCathode)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2011, 12:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992/99 "2011-08-02T00:11:36Z")

</div>

> [@Scotty Mo](#):
>
> Well I don’t really have the time for that, sorry. Why can’t you just take my word for it?

If you don’t have time to debate according to this forum’s standards, I would suggest you refrain from starting threads in GD.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2011, 12:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992/100 "2011-08-02T00:15:53Z")

</div>

> [@Scotty Mo](#):
>
> So your saying they’re one in the same.

No I’m not, I’m saying that one is right and one is wrong. We distinguish between murder and killing in self defense.

> [@Scotty Mo](#):
>
> Then what’s the difference between one guy sucker punching another for no reason than he’s having a bad day and the other guy taking recourse so as not to be harmed?

:dubious: Um, one is an idiot and the other has managed to avoid a fight? Not much similarity between the two. And no, sometime you can’t avoid fights, and sometimes avoiding a fight is unethical.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-if-women-ruled-the-world/590992.md?page=6)
