Actually moving away from the Buffy, Angel and V:tM takes on vampires for a bit…
There have been several thread references to a “supernatural” essence being a reason for the vampire, but I’ve read several takes where authors have posited that that’s not the case. If, for example, the vampirism was caused by a sort of virus, or if in fact it was a true mutation of humanity caused by exposure to some outside agent, then we might see some different reactions entirely.
I don’t ever call having read anything to indicate that extreme cold temperatures would drive a vampire into torpor. Therefore, would it be safe to assume that a vampire’s hypothalamus is working, to some extent, to regulate the body temperature? If so, we can probably assume that some level of heat is being given off, no matter what. Since it doesn’t seem that they can starve to death either, my vote’s that said heat has to do with how much blood they last took in, how long it’s been since they’ve fed, and what kind of metabolic rate the vampire has – there’s got to be some differentiation in that, since some vamps seem to be able to go ages without feeding and some seem to need a great deal more.
What determines said metabolic rate, I couldn’t begin to guess, but I imagine it would differ depending upon whether you believe that there are supernatural forces powering the whole deal or if the vampirism is due to mutation and/or viral work. If it’s the former, anything goes. If the latter, you could probably figure something out by looking at the workings of the viral agent or mutagen.
One thought, if you’re into the mutagen/viral theory: perhaps the mutagen/virus/whatever is able to survive on its own resources almost indefinitely or is able to drive itself and its host into an indeterminate period of dormancy if needed. The blood, in that case, would act as a catalyst to enable it to do more than simply survive. But that’s just a guess.
By the way, IMHO, ‘doing the nasty’ and the ability thereto is probably the second point of most variance I’ve seen in vampire fiction, with the third being levels of supernatural/superhuman ability and the first being the cause of the vampirism. To throw in two more authors I haven’t yet seen mentioned, Chelsea Quinn Yarbro’s male vampires can’t [and IIRC, she does an excellent job of explaining just why; I’m too senile to remember what the explanation was]; Tanya Huff’s can, but she posits that vampires have a metabolism; it’s just a LOT slower than the average human’s. [Hers age as well.] And of course, there are the dozens and dozens of writers who take positions somewhere in between.
It’s all the fault of the writers. Bunch of damn inconsistent…
[sub] Hm, just seemed to have drenched myself with tar from that brush I was wielding…[/sub]