Okay, I’ve got an issue here. Putting aside the “tip outs” please explain to me why, at a nice restaurant if I order a $60 lobster tail instead of the $20 chicken entree, is the service any more difficult? After tax, I’m paying $65.25 for the lobster. If having the chicken I pay $21.75 including tax. On the lobster I’m expected to plop down an additional $13.05 for the tip (if taxes are included); if having chicken it’s $4.35. Does carrying the lobster instead of the chicken deserve an additional $8 simply because it cost more?
Now THAT’s what I don’t understand about tipping. Again mentioning that we’re putting aside the tip outs in my fantasy world.
I’d be all for a flat pre-stated “service charge” if it were fair. Sheesh, I’m already popping on an expensive dinner treat (a real treat) but that it costs more yet doesn’t require any extra work for the waitron grinds my gears when they’re expecting the high tip simply because I chose to splurge for an evening. The waiter/ess didn’t work any harder, or smarter, they simply brought an expensive plate to the table. They do nothing different from the chicken entree, yet the service is worth three times as much?
Tipping Out sucks. If I wanted to tip the busboy for great clearing or water-filling, I should be allowed to do so. I now ask in certain places if the tips are pooled, and if someone did something special for me I tell them specifically “this if for you - shove it down your pants or something”.
Not to liken fine dining to Starbucks or anything, but if I toss a couple coins in the tip box and find that the barrista took extra care or did something unusual for me, they get a buck in their hand, not from the box. But they prolly take their share from the box too.
All too damn confusing. Please don’t kill me.