Sure, I do. Do you? I mean, you didn’t really read the editorial endorsing her, which quite clearly addresses the substance of your “concerns.”
Instead, you engage in a debate that’s somewhat reminiscent of Jesse Helms’ “Hands” ad in which you say that the newspaper is endorsing her on the basis of her race, sex, and sexual preferences; and you completely disregard her qualifications even when they are pointed out to you. But then, when a white male Republican of even lesser qualifications is running, you are enthusiastic to overlook the exact same criticisms of his fitness of office.
The double standard you are perpetuating is so completely obvious and blatant, and yet you seem to be the only one in this thread not seeing it.