# What Is Ectoplasm?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [July 8, 2006, 12:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621 "2006-07-08T12:50:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ralph124c](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/8797f3/32.png) [@ralph124c](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ralph124c)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2006, 12:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621/1 "2006-07-08T12:50:45Z")

</div>

If you read 19th century spiritualist literature, you will come across a term called “ectoplasm”. It seems to be some kind of material, exuded from a medium’s body, during seances. Has this stuff ever been analyzed? What is it, and do meadiums still produce it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lemur866](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lemur866/32/434_2.png) [@Lemur866](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lemur866)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2006, 1:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621/2 "2006-07-08T13:42:31Z")

</div>

It’s fictional, dude.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![spingears](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ebca7d/32.png) [@spingears](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/spingears)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2006, 1:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621/3 "2006-07-08T13:46:25Z")

</div>

> [@ralph124c](#):
>
> If you read 19th century spiritualist literature, you will come across a term called “ectoplasm”. It seems to be some kind of material, exuded from a medium’s body, during seances. Has this stuff ever been analyzed? What is it, and do meadiums still produce it?

Allegedly:

1. The visible substance believed to emanate from the body of a spiritualistic medium during communication with the dead.
2. An immaterial or ethereal substance, especially the transparent corporeal presence of a spirit or ghost.

How do you analyize the intangible. It is the product of belief not reality.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Happy\_Clam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/3bc359/32.png) [@Happy\_Clam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Happy_Clam)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2006, 2:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621/4 "2006-07-08T14:00:27Z")

</div>

Actually, I believe some mediums would “materialise” the stuff- actually, they had trained their bodies to be able to regurgitate stuff held in the gullet. Obviously the material they used varied from person to person, but from reading descriptions I’d imagine it was a paste of some sort, probably made of flour or other nontoxic substance. You can see photographs of mediums vomitting up “ectoplasm”- I believe one woman used cloth, painted with luminescent chemicals (which I can’t imagine did her any good). Of course, this would all be in the context of a seance (which were designed to obfuscate and hide the tricks of the mediums), so anyone scientifically interested would never get near enough the ectoplasm to analyse it- it would have “mysteriously dissapeared” by the end of the seance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tuckerfan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/eada6e/32.png) [@Tuckerfan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tuckerfan)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2006, 2:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621/5 "2006-07-08T14:39:38Z")

</div>

I’ve seen photos of the stuff and it looked to be a light colored foamy material.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Triskadecamus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b19c9b/32.png) [@Triskadecamus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Triskadecamus)\
**Post date:** [July 8, 2006, 3:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621/6 "2006-07-08T15:09:00Z")

</div>

Ectoplasm was the charlatan pseudoscience equivalent of “Ether” but unlike the real science substance ether, Ectoplasm didn’t really exist. Later, it turned out that ether wasn’t holding up as well as expected. Ectoplasm however has remained in the spiritual cosmos of quite a few true believers.

Tris

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Derleth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b9e5f3/32.png) [@Derleth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Derleth)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2006, 12:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621/7 "2006-07-09T00:11:58Z")

</div>

> [@Triskadecamus](#):
>
> Ectoplasm was the charlatan pseudoscience equivalent of “Ether” but unlike the real science substance ether, Ectoplasm didn’t really exist. Later, it turned out that ether wasn’t holding up as well as expected. Ectoplasm however has remained in the spiritual cosmos of quite a few true believers.
> 
> Tris

To expand on this: ‘Ether’ (or aether, or æther), in this context, is what scientists once thought light waves propagated in. The idea was that, just as sound waves cannot propagate without air or water or some other medium, light waves couldn’t propagate without ether. As it turns out, that notion was severely shaken in the [Michaelson-Morley experiment](http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/lectures/michelson.html), which lead the way to our modern notions of how light behaves.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2006, 12:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621/8 "2006-07-09T00:17:56Z")

</div>

Haven’t we come full circle on the ether/aether thing though? - in that string theory posits a medium through which _everything_, including matter, propagates.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2006, 12:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621/9 "2006-07-09T00:22:32Z")

</div>

I’ve got some. Wanna see?! 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NDP](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ndp/32/55_2.png) [@NDP](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/NDP)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2006, 12:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621/10 "2006-07-09T00:25:55Z")

</div>

> [@Lemur866](#):
>
> It’s fictional, dude.

[Not entirely.](http://www.biology-online.org/dictionary/Ectoplasm)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Race\_Bannon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/5f8ce5/32.png) [@Race\_Bannon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Race_Bannon)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2006, 2:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621/11 "2006-07-09T02:58:07Z")

</div>

Mary Roach’s book Spook - Science Tackles the Afterlife devotes a whole chapter to ectoplasm, including a descriptive visit to a library (I forget where, I think in the UK somewhere) that has a sample of it.

Her conclusion, ectoplasm is a hoax - it’s material secreted away by the medium (in the mouth, under a skirt, even (yes) up the vagina). The sample resembles gauze.

In the latest copy of Skeptical Inquirer, there’s a photo of a medium with “ectoplasm” on her head and face, and a goofy expression. It looks like gauze.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mathochist](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c89c15/32.png) [@Mathochist](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mathochist)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2006, 3:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621/12 "2006-07-09T03:20:07Z")

</div>

> [@Mangetout](#):
>
> Haven’t we come full circle on the ether/aether thing though? - in that string theory posits a medium through which _everything_, including matter, propagates.

Hold on a second there… String theory posits a what now? And this wasn’t put into my copy of Green Schwartz and Witten because?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dijon\_Warlock](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/a9a28c/32.png) [@Dijon\_Warlock](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dijon_Warlock)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2006, 3:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621/13 "2006-07-09T03:23:32Z")

</div>

From [ectoplasm - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com](http://skepdic.com/ectoplasm.html)

> [@](#):
>
> Ectoplasm is stuff that allegedly oozes from ghosts or spirits and makes it possible for them to materialize and perform feats of telekinesis, such as lifting tables in the dark (the stuff was sometimes called teleplasmic mass).

[Some pics](http://www.prairieghosts.com/ectoplasm.html). [This may be the picture](http://www.survivalafterdeath.org/photographs/harrison/1.htm) that **Race** is talking about (although it may not).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dijon\_Warlock](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/a9a28c/32.png) [@Dijon\_Warlock](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dijon_Warlock)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2006, 3:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621/14 "2006-07-09T03:26:55Z")

</div>

Well, dagnabbit, it probably ISN’T the picture that **Race** is talking about. I thought I deleted that part.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ianzin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/ed655f/32.png) [@ianzin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ianzin)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2006, 9:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621/15 "2006-07-09T09:26:04Z")

</div>

What believers claim: that some spirit mediums, who practise so-called physical mediumship, are or were able to manifest some sort of amorphous material that can take temporary physical / visible form in ‘our’ world. This material, known as ectoplasm, usually emanates from one or more orifices of the spirit medium’s body, seems white and/or luminous, and can adapt itself to take many forms, including (a) the faces and bodies of the dead, (b) pseudo-limbs, © solid objects such as rods that can be used to tip tables and raise things into the air, (d) screens on which images from the other side can be shown.

What the evidence doesn’t show: that there is any such thing as ectoplasm.

What the evidence does show: that some of these charlatans enhanced their con-artistry with various materials such as muslin dipped in luminous paint that were passed off as ‘ectoplasm’, and that looked spooky in the darkened seance room and in faked photographs. The notion of ectoplasm also provides a handy catch-all excuse when these con-artists are caught cheating. “Look! Here’s a flash photo that the con-artist didn’t know we were going to take and it shows her pushing the table with a reaching rod!” “No, that’s a form of ectoplasm, it’s an ethereal substance _in the **form** of a solid rod_ used by the spirits to manifest their presence.” And so on. Want to explain anything away? Call it ectoplasm.

Incidentally, the greatest collection of images of spirit mediums, ectoplasm and suchlike that I’ve ever seen is in a book by Massimo Polidoro called ‘Viaggio tra gli spiriti’ (Journey into the world of the spirits). It’s in Italian, as you may have guessed. But the pictures are brilliant.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![internetslacker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/da6949/32.png) [@internetslacker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/internetslacker)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2006, 3:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621/16 "2006-07-09T15:48:21Z")

</div>

Heh, remember that scene from ‘Ghostbusters’?

Ray: Peter, are you okay?!?

Peter: He… he slimed me.

Classic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Race\_Bannon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/5f8ce5/32.png) [@Race\_Bannon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Race_Bannon)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2006, 5:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621/17 "2006-07-09T17:12:46Z")

</div>

> [@Dijon Warlock](#):
>
> From [ectoplasm - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com](http://skepdic.com/ectoplasm.html)[Some pics](http://www.prairieghosts.com/ectoplasm.html). [This may be the picture](http://www.survivalafterdeath.org/photographs/harrison/1.htm) that **Race** is talking about (although it may not).

Your first link has the pic I was talking about.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dijon\_Warlock](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/a9a28c/32.png) [@Dijon\_Warlock](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dijon_Warlock)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2006, 5:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621/18 "2006-07-09T17:15:52Z")

</div>

…and here I thought I was wrong, but I wasn’t! 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [July 10, 2006, 11:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621/19 "2006-07-10T11:20:28Z")

</div>

Some of the substances alleged to be used for “ectoplasm” were cheesecloth and lung tissue (presumably obtained from some slaughtered animal). I’ve seen one old photo where the ectoplasm looked like a potato. In other words, ectoplasm was whatever odd and often ooky substance the medium could get hold of and hide somewhere onm their bodies to be produced in time for the photographer to snap a picture of in the middle of a dark seance.  
I’ve always thought it would be neat if ghost cells had an _ectoplasmic reticulum_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)\
**Post date:** [July 10, 2006, 2:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-ectoplasm/363621/20 "2006-07-10T14:30:37Z")

</div>

> [@internetslacker](#):
>
> Heh, remember that scene from ‘Ghostbusters’?
> 
> Ray: Peter, are you okay?!?
> 
> Peter: He… he slimed me.
> 
> Classic.

Just what I was gonna post! 😃
