Worst CPR I ever saw was on CSI: NY. Guy who was being interrogated collapsed into a seizure, frothing at the mouth, and all, and the detective immediately begins chest compressions, during which, a CSI takes the pulse of the seizing guy, and notes that he “has a pulse.” I hope to shout he does.
Outside hospitals, it doesn’t even need to be high-quality CPR. Traditional first aid was just “hit them in the chest really hard”, and in the one case I knew about, that worked.
Honestly, it’s like the writers wanted all the CPR scenes to be infuriatingly stupid. Let’s take time in the middle of our flight from a superpowered maniac to hold a “basics of CPR” class. You know, just in case, wink wink that’s foreshadowing if you didn’t notice.
Oooh, there’s a guy who fell down, let’s hit the ol’ CPR for a bit, that’s what you do to unconscious people. When he opens his eyes, send him home, no need for followup treatment it’s not like his heart stopped or nothin’, just needed some CPR to get him back on his feet.
But in movies/TV when someone is about to take a standardized test that’s closed by a small piece of tape and they use their pencil to break it open right when they start the test.
In my experience the tape is so thin you can just open it by opening the test paper yourself.
Just be glad it wasn’t an episode of NCIS. That show would have had two people giving the guy chest compressions at the same time, just like they use 2 people typing on the same keyboard to defend against a hacker.
There’s been much discussion of the knockout blow that causes prolonged unconsciousness with no lasting damage whatsoever (wrong– any injury that causes unconsciousness for more than a few brief seconds risks severe brain injury).
Also the old “splash some chloroform on a rag and hold it over someone’s face-- they’re instantly down for the count” maneuver (wrong– it takes several minutes for cholorform to put someone out).
But how about the tried-and-true “take out enemies you don’t want to kill with a tranq dart gun” move? I was just reminded of that in a book I’m reading, but it shows up all the time in TV and movies. Has that been mentioned in this thread yet? Yes, looks like once, from a thread search:
Tranquilizer darts shot from air guns is a thing, but to sedate animals, not people. I did a bit of googling to see how quickly they do work (I hope I’m not on some kind of Google watch list due to the crazy things I google while looking up info for various posts like this). According to this wiki page:
If an animal is out of control, a fast-acting sedative will be used. These take between 2 and 8 minutes to take effect
So if you’re looking to humanely take out a sentry before they can alert the rest of the outpost, tranq darts won’t work-- they’ll have plenty of time to hit the alarm button before they go down.
Also, there’s no way to exactly gauge the proper dosage (YT ‘what if’ video)-- it could be too little, just relaxing them; too much, killling them; it could also cause a serious allergic reaction that required emergency medical attention.
I remember seeing a single-panel cartoon as a kid showing a hippo in a zoo pen and two zoo-keepers on one side, one with a rifle saying, “Funny. He should be down by now,”
On the opposite side is a prone guy with a dart in his butt.
Nitpick: heavily regulated (how many gangsters were going to register their machine guns with the federal government?). And of course state laws widely banned them.
My algorithm has decided to show me clips of courtroom dramas. I’ve seen more gavels being banged than I can count. I work part time in a courtroom. I’ve been in many other courtrooms. I’ve never seen a judge use the gavel. Maybe it’s a regional thing? There is a gavel. It’s up there on the bench as decoration saying “this is a courtroom.” I’ve never seen the judge even glance at it.