I’ve seen the movie a handful of times…hopefully that’ll be enough to get me up to speed when I read the book.
Funny you should mention the alcoholism part, when I saw the movie the first one or two times I didn’t notice the drinking, it wasn’t until I caught a few minutes of the miniseries (the part where Brian from Wings was getting hammered and hallucinating a party) that I said ‘ooooh, that makes sense, he was a drunk’. I mentioned it to a friend of mine and she said they spent more time in the book and miniseries on his drinking. Just now, looking at the wiki page for the movie version I see that King said he feels they left out too much of the alcoholism part so I probably wasn’t the only person who missed that.
I was torn between The Stand and The Shining. The Stand is probably my favorite Stephen King novel but The Shining is tightly written and one of the few (IMHO) Stephen King perfect endings. Close behind (in this order) are *Dolores Claiborne, The Green Mile *and Misery. *Misery *was the first SK book I read and I remember sitting by the pool one summer as a teenager as one of my friends read out load the foot scene and I was hooked…
I voted for The Shining, as it is a great book cover to cover. My own opinion is that Firestarter is a great book, and vastly under-rated, and that The Stand is so-so and generally over-rated. I loved Black House, and really dug 11/22/63. 11/22/63 is the most recent SK that I’ve read.
I think there are a number of votes for later SK novels because, well, they are later. They might be fresher in the reader’s taste and mind, but I wonder how well they will stack up in 20 years.
The Stand has its flaws, yes. But most novels do, if you look at them from all perspectives. I still think it has the best chance of being the last SK novel standing… in 50, 100 years. Those who dislike it because it’s too sprawling and has too many stories are advised to steer clear of quite a few highly-regarded classic novels.
The Dead Zone is the one I enjoyed the most, but I read it when I was a kid. I suspect, much like Robert Ludlum novels, were I to reread it, I would not feel the same way.
I could have picked 4-5 books, including The Stand, The Shining, It, Pet Semetary, but voted for Eyes of the Dragon. Since it’s fantasy based, I think it holds up well. And it’s a great bit of storytelling. I like the way King seems to have aimed it at younger readers (it’s got that fairy tale vibe), but doesn’t talk down to them. A great read.
I picked Misery as his best book; I really think it’s between that and Delores Claiborne where he really shows that he can actually write and horror is a part of that, but not his only weapon at all. However The Stand is my favorite. And I think Itis the scariest.
I voted The Gunslinger. Of all the King novels I’ve read, it was the only one that really hooked me from the first sentence.
While I didn’t care as much for the follow on novels, The Gunslinger never has grown “old;” every time I re-read it, it still hooks me the same way as the first time.
So my vote isn’t for an objective best King novel, but for my favorite.
I don’t feel qualified to vote, because I’ve read only two of his novels to date: Dolores Claiborne and 11/22/63. Of those two, I found the latter far superior. But I will be starting The Stand over the New Year’s holiday.
Blank Slate, I voted for the “Dead Zone”. Reread it about a year ago. While the setting may be a little dated it does hold up as an excellent example of King’s early work.