What is still holding back fuel cells?

It is a myth that hydrogen caused the Hindenburg fire. The fire was ignited by and mainly fueled by the coating on the airship. There are many references to this eg
http://www.e-sources.com/hydrogen/safety.html.

Driving around at 100km/h in a 2 tonne steel box with a tank containing 60 L of volatile, highly flammable hydrocarbons doesn’t seem to get much bad press.

But is the platinum question without merit?

Well, as I said this may be slightly out of date, but was true when I wrote this in 2000:

And…

Sorry, I don’t have my original sources.

Check out the latest issue of Scientific American – their cover story is on this subject.
Sadly, this is not one of the articles they have chosen to provide for free on their website.

Here’s a link to the company that’s working on some pretty new concepts
No noble materials, they say.
Peace,
mangeorge

This article is interesting.

The article says that the cell would cost about $15. It’s not powerful enough for a car but it’s a step in the right direction. And I like the idea of using your garbage to power your appliances.