# What is the argument in favor of gay marriage?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [January 4, 2006, 7:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448 "2006-01-04T19:53:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2006, 4:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448/81 "2006-01-05T16:01:47Z")

</div>

> [@bobthebuilder](#):
>
> WIthout religion is there really a difference between cohabitation and marriage?

Um… yes - all the legal stuff regarding property and rights etc, which is why you need the state to be involved.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobthebuilder](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/c67d28/32.png) [@bobthebuilder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobthebuilder)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2006, 4:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448/82 "2006-01-05T16:02:59Z")

</div>

> [@Mangetout](#):
>
> Um… yes - all the legal stuff regarding property and rights etc, which is why you need the state to be involved.

From my understanding of law legal rights especially surrounding property can be garaunteed under cohabiation as well as marriage.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zamboniracer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/e9a140/32.png) [@zamboniracer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zamboniracer)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2006, 4:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448/83 "2006-01-05T16:08:48Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Bricker

So from an _argument_ perspective, I’d say the case is made when you show that people want it and it doesn’t harm anyone. It’s for the side arguing against it to then show reasons to keep it illegal.[/QUOTE]

Not quite. I can also argue against it by showing that the majority of people don’t want it, and that it harms, or at least costs money to, people who don’t want it.

The first question of legislation is, what’s in it for me? As a straight person what do I get out of legalizing gay marriage? If the answer is that there’s nothing in it for me then I am pefectly justified in opposing it. If I am indifferent to gays’ happiness, and I am because I think people control their own happiness, I have no obligation to support legislation that benefits one group and not my group.

The comparisons between discrimination against blacks and gays do not sway me. Laws which prevented blacks from marrying whites harmed me because they would have made it illegal for me, a white man, to marry Halle Berry. (Well, that and Halle’s eyesight would prevent her from marrying me but that’s another matter.) I directly benefited from eliminating those laws. Further, for a gay to compare not being able to marry to slavery (which involved beatings, rape, no right to own property, no right to vote, forced breakup of families, etc.) is to stretch the analogy well past the breaking point, like comparing having a zit to being impaled through the heart.

Further, gay marriage hits me in the pocketbook. If gays are allowed to marry then my costs as a taxpayer for pay for the costs of divorce court will go up, because if gays can marry then they can divorce too and so the number of divorces will go up as will the cost of administering the court. If gays can marry then they will have access to numerous tax benefits which are not free money but will cost the public treasury something, which means that I will be paying for it out of my taxes.

As a self employed person I also support a Canadian style health care system, the political support for which from gays drops as they gain access to health care through their partners’ work benefits. Again, since I am not helped by having gays gain access to health care that way, I am justified in opposing it.

The changing family argument doesn’t sway me either. A marriage between a man and a woman deserves to be supported if for no other reason then it provides the most efficient way of repopulating the country, which is vital to the country’s very survival. Gay marriage doesn’t contribute a whit to that.

Sorry, but gay marriage does nothing for me and costs me money. I’m against it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2006, 4:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448/84 "2006-01-05T16:10:45Z")

</div>

> [@bobthebuilder](#):
>
> From my understanding of law legal rights especially surrounding property can be garaunteed under cohabiation as well as marriage.

Not nearly as simply, or even once-for-always, I’m sure.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2006, 4:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448/85 "2006-01-05T16:18:26Z")

</div>

> [@zamboniracer](#):
>
> Sorry, but gay marriage does nothing for me and costs me money. I’m against it.

So basically, your saying “I’m utterly selfish, and therefore oppose gay marriage” ? You do realize your attitude can and is used to support any number of evils, don’t you ?

Sociopathy is not good public policy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobthebuilder](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/c67d28/32.png) [@bobthebuilder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobthebuilder)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2006, 4:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448/86 "2006-01-05T16:19:49Z")

</div>

> [@Der Trihs](#):
>
> So basically, your saying “I’m utterly selfish, and therefore oppose gay marriage” ? You do realize your attitude can and is used to support any number of evils, don’t you ?
> 
> Sociopathy is not good public policy.

He is probobly living by the objectivist philosophy and why not?

Im against marriage being an issue of government in general for the same reason that he is against gay marriage.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zamboniracer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/e9a140/32.png) [@zamboniracer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zamboniracer)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2006, 4:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448/87 "2006-01-05T16:27:39Z")

</div>

> [@Der Trihs](#):
>
> So basically, your saying “I’m utterly selfish, and therefore oppose gay marriage” ? You do realize your attitude can and is used to support any number of evils, don’t you ?
> 
> Sociopathy is not good public policy.

I thought personal insults were not allowed in this forum. I am neither selfish nor a sociopath and I demand an apology.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2006, 4:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448/88 "2006-01-05T16:36:07Z")

</div>

So, **zamboniracer** , simple human decency doesn’t figure in at all to your world view?

Good to know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2006, 4:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448/89 "2006-01-05T16:45:23Z")

</div>

> [@zamboniracer](#):
>
> I thought personal insults were not allowed in this forum. I am neither selfish nor a sociopath and I demand an apology.

Why ? You just posted a long statement about how you care nothing about other’s rights or welfare; that all that matters to you is how you personally profit. That seems like sociopathy/selfishness to me.

Besides, I posed my statement as a question to invite you to defend your position. How is a lack of concern for others _not_ selfish ? Isn’t that the definition of selfishness ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobthebuilder](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/c67d28/32.png) [@bobthebuilder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobthebuilder)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2006, 5:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448/90 "2006-01-05T17:16:57Z")

</div>

> [@Der Trihs](#):
>
> Why ? You just posted a long statement about how you care nothing about other’s rights or welfare; that all that matters to you is how you personally profit. That seems like sociopathy/selfishness to me.
> 
> Besides, I posed my statement as a question to invite you to defend your position. How is a lack of concern for others _not_ selfish ? Isn’t that the definition of selfishness ?

furthermore who determined that Selfishness is a bad thing. All humans are selfish it just take an honest one to admit his own selfishness.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2006, 5:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448/91 "2006-01-05T17:20:12Z")

</div>

> [@bobthebuilder](#):
>
> furthermore who determined that Selfishness is a bad thing.

Human society in general over the past 2000+ years?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Polycarp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/82dd89/32.png) [@Polycarp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Polycarp)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2006, 5:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448/92 "2006-01-05T17:21:13Z")

</div>

> [@Malacandra](#):
>
> Neither. The post would have read better if I hadn’t got one of the bullet points arse-backwards: it should have read
> 
> “- A randomly selected couple who stick it up the butt are more likely to be _straight_ than _gay_.”
> 
> I was just chasing down a couple of bits of nonsense that my good friend **Polycarp** really knows better than to perpetrate.
> 
> More straight couples than gay practise anal sex for the same reason that more straights than gays eat porridge for breakfast: _there are many more of them_. Nevertheless, anal can be “stereotypically gay” simply because gays are more likely, man for man, to do it than straights are. (They may not be, for all I know.) To what extent gays actually _do_ care for the practice - I neither know nor intend to lose sleep over the question.

You’re right, of course. Though I think the point is telling, nonetheless, since generally the person advancing the argument it’s contraindicative for has the conceptions that “anal sex is sinful and/or gross” and “anal intercourse is endemic to male gay sex.” In that respect, it’s a valid point, because it performs the necessary dissociation.

However, with reference to your parallel, no true gay man would eat sugar on his porridge. 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2006, 5:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448/93 "2006-01-05T17:26:18Z")

</div>

> [@bobthebuilder](#):
>
> furthermore who determined that Selfishness is a bad thing. All humans are selfish it just take an honest one to admit his own selfishness.

No, they aren’t. People help others all the time with no threat or profit involved; people raise children despite the effort and expense; people don’t automatically betray or kill one another if they can get away with it. Self interest is a component of a healthy personality, but _only_ a component; not all there is.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Polycarp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/82dd89/32.png) [@Polycarp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Polycarp)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2006, 5:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448/94 "2006-01-05T17:28:23Z")

</div>

> [@bobthebuilder](#):
>
> furthermore who determined that Selfishness is a bad thing. All humans are selfish it just take an honest one to admit his own selfishness.

Perhaps the alleged Originator of the “family values” so beloved of most opponents of gay marriage? I can provide you about 100 cites in support of that, if you like.  
**Bricker** and **Hamlet** : Asked purely for clarification, since it was discussed a year ago and I’ll admit to being too lazy to try to search it out: Can you quickly resummarize for me (and others who might be interested) why the “rational basis” test is the proper one to apply to this question, as opposed to intermediate or strict scrutiny? I’m not prepared at present to argue against it, but I don’t recall the grounds on which it was alleged to be the right level of scrutiny, and would appreciate that my ignorance be fought.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thudlow\_Boink](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thudlow_boink/32/320_2.png) [@Thudlow\_Boink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thudlow_Boink)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2006, 5:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448/95 "2006-01-05T17:51:41Z")

</div>

> [@Serket](#):
>
> 1. I think it is healthier for a child to be raised by both a male and a female and having a parent of the same gender as you can help you with gender specific issues

Interestingly, today’s Dear Abby column relates to this issue. The column is available online, but I’m afraid that if I try to link to it, the link will be out of date by tomorrow. I’ll post an excerpt:

> [@5-Jan-06 Dear Abby](#):
>
> Further, according to the American Psychological Association, “there is no evidence to suggest that lesbians or gay men are unfit to be parents or that psychosocial development among children of gay men and lesbians is compromised in any respect relevant to that among offspring of heterosexual parents. … Indeed, the evidence to date suggests that home environments provided by gay and lesbian parents are as likely as those provided by heterosexual parents to SUPPORT and ENABLE children’s psychosocial growth.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobthebuilder](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/c67d28/32.png) [@bobthebuilder](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobthebuilder)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2006, 5:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448/96 "2006-01-05T17:55:01Z")

</div>

> [@Der Trihs](#):
>
> No, they aren’t. People help others all the time with no threat or profit involved; people raise children despite the effort and expense; people don’t automatically betray or kill one another if they can get away with it. Self interest is a component of a healthy personality, but _only_ a component; not all there is.

They do it because it makes them feel better  
human behavior is motivated by selfishness. I dont kill said person because of what will happen to me if I do kill him.  
I help people because I feel better about myself if I do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lilairen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/8491ac/32.png) [@Lilairen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lilairen)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2006, 5:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448/97 "2006-01-05T17:55:16Z")

</div>

> [@Illuminatiprimus](#):
>
> Sooooooo… if we stopped talking about gay marriage and started talking about civil partnerships etc, would this make it more palatable to people?

I’m not terribly fond of the whole “civil partnership” thing, myself. Marriage is pretty much a universal human thing for recognising relationships, and the whole creating a secondary status strikes me as having the essential message of, “Your relationship isn’t good enough to be considered real.”

As a means of getting protections of some sort for people who need them, I’m willing to consider it a start. But that’s as far as I go; it’s a less-bad thing, not a good thing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Revtim](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/revtim/32/1042_2.png) [@Revtim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Revtim)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2006, 5:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448/98 "2006-01-05T17:55:26Z")

</div>

Abby must be part of the liberal media conspiracy to force the militant gay agenda onto the public.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Patty\_O\_Furniture](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/96bed5/32.png) [@Patty\_O\_Furniture](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Patty_O_Furniture)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2006, 6:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448/99 "2006-01-05T18:06:43Z")

</div>

> [@Polycarp](#):
>
> **Bricker** and **Hamlet** : Asked purely for clarification, since it was discussed a year ago and I’ll admit to being too lazy to try to search it out: Can you quickly resummarize for me (and others who might be interested) why the “rational basis” test is the proper one to apply to this question, as opposed to intermediate or strict scrutiny?

The whole _rational basis_ discussion happens in [this thread](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=337725&highlight=rational+basis), beginning around post #42.

I am re-reading for the second time and it’s still not sinking in.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lilairen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/8491ac/32.png) [@Lilairen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lilairen)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2006, 6:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448/100 "2006-01-05T18:08:12Z")

</div>

> [@bobthebuilder](#):
>
> WIthout religion is there really a difference between cohabitation and marriage?

Let’s see. Marriage is a formal/explicit declaration of a commitment containing mutual obligations and responsibilities, an establishment of a familial relationship, and the means by which a relationship is typically recognised as legit by a community and earns that community’s support.

Cohabitation … isn’t.

No gods necessary. (Which is just fine by me, since my gods aren’t interested in mucking about with marriages in the first place. Not Their business.)

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-argument-in-favor-of-gay-marriage/338448.md?page=6)
