# What is the Darwinian explanation for stupid people?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [December 13, 2003, 8:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762 "2003-12-13T08:57:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Markxxx](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/5daacb/32.png) [@Markxxx](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Markxxx)\
**Post date:** [December 14, 2003, 3:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762/21 "2003-12-14T03:53:13Z")

</div>

I can tell you right now I am WAY smarter than GW Bush EVER could HOPE to be and I am not President.  
Why? Because I don’t have a brother to help me STEAL an election.

I could run Hitler as Governor and Stalin As Lt Governor in Texas and as long as they were a Republican they’d win.

I find it odd how people equate achievement with knowledge. A lot of STUPID people graduate from TOP universities just as a LOT of TOP executives and scientists graduate from Small Colleges (Think Reagen --\> Eureka College)

Marilyn Vos Savant was once asked “If you are the smartest women in the world, why aren’t you the richest.”

To answer the question “evolution DOESN’T DO WHAT IS BEST.” It does “WHAT WORKS.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![engineer\_comp\_geek](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/engineer_comp_geek/32/504_2.png) [@engineer\_comp\_geek](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/engineer_comp_geek)\
**Post date:** [December 14, 2003, 5:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762/22 "2003-12-14T05:42:36Z")

</div>

I can’t think of too many things that have been around longer than sharks, and as far as brain power goes they are pretty low on the scale. A lot of people seem to think that evolution is pushing every creature towards us, but the reality is that a bigger brain is a relatively recent experiment on the evolutionary scale of things. Considering how much damage we are doing to the earth, one could argue that it’s not a very successful experiment so far. We are ripping out the very ecosystem that keeps us all alive, and you’re only concerned about people who stub their cigarettes out on couches.

But then again, who am I to interrupt a good thread about GW bashing. Please, continue.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![devilsknew](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4da419/32.png) [@devilsknew](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/devilsknew)\
**Post date:** [December 14, 2003, 7:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762/23 "2003-12-14T07:59:50Z")

</div>

Stupid is relative. If not for the genius and world enlightening views of many who would have been considered stupid or useless…after all stupid is the social convention of “useless”, the idiot savants of our generation, much of our progress as a society would be negated. I think stupid depends more on where you are coming from, rather than “stupid people”. Perhaps there is a new evolutionary advantage to being “stupid”. Generally stupid implies being less aware…this could prove an evolutionary advantage to the unaware and lower blood pressured “stupid”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Vision\_of\_Love](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/5f8ce5/32.png) [@Vision\_of\_Love](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Vision_of_Love)\
**Post date:** [December 14, 2003, 8:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762/24 "2003-12-14T08:25:21Z")

</div>

No matter how intelligent two parents are, their child can end up with below average intelligence due to socialization and other external forces. It ain’t all in the genes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Kentzel-Griffin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ccd318/32.png) [@John\_Kentzel-Griffin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Kentzel-Griffin)\
**Post date:** [December 14, 2003, 9:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762/25 "2003-12-14T09:23:56Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by \*\*\*engineer\_comp\_geek \*\*
> 
> But then again, who am I to interrupt a good thread about GW bashing. Please, continue.

No. Don’t continue.

That’s enough George Bush bashing. We are not going to have any more politics and we are certainly not going to have any more pot shots at the president.

**DrMatrix** - GQ Moderator

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hari\_Seldon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hari_seldon/32/5173_2.png) [@Hari\_Seldon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hari_Seldon)\
**Post date:** [December 14, 2003, 11:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762/26 "2003-12-14T11:52:33Z")

</div>

Maybe the GW Bush debate could be moved to another forum.

Here are some random thoughts on the question:

The first two behaviors mentioned are not necessarily evidence of stupidity; they are more like, “I don’t give a shit about you.” The third is certainly ignorance worthy of the Darwin award and probably stupidity as well.

Just remember that fully 50% of the human population is below average.

But the real question is who mates and, above all, who gets to have the most children (and whose children get to mate most often and have the most children and …). Is there any correlation of this with intelligence? There are many organisms that have few if any brains (think about flies and plants) that do just fine in the Darwinian sense. Think about 165 million years of dinosaur evolution that apparently never evolved in anything with human intelligence. Even today, it is not obvious that in a Darwinian sense intelligence is a positive trait. I know some very intelligent people who have made a conscious decision not to breed. And some very stupid people who breed like flies. They may be poor, but they go on breeding.

In fact, looking at the evolutionary history of earth, I am astonished that human intelligence did evolve. After all, the ape that turned into man in east Africa, evolved into the chimp in west Africa. And while chimps are geniuses compared to the rest of the animal world, they are chumps compared to us and certainly never developed human type language, which is the great divide.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![alterego](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/6bbea6/32.png) [@alterego](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/alterego)\
**Post date:** [December 14, 2003, 4:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762/27 "2003-12-14T16:05:42Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by David Simmons \*  
> \*\*I don’t think merely being the leader of a country is a criterion. Here is one of those cases where I think reference to Hitler is justified. He was the unquestioned leader of Germany and a genius at knowing how to rouse them to action. However, I’m not sure he was particularly intelligent. \*\*

This is very arguable. I will simply say that you definitively need to rethink it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![boofy\_bloke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/9e8a1a/32.png) [@boofy\_bloke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/boofy_bloke)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2003, 2:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762/28 "2003-12-15T02:05:04Z")

</div>

Hmmm… interesting points. Perhaps if I rephrase my question:

How is it that after 10 million years of evolution we have people of such stupidity that they will hold a lit firecracker in their hand to see what happens when it goes off? Or use a vacuum cleaner to simulate fellatio?

The George Bush remark was more about the stupidity of social conditioning (e.g. refusing to sign the Kyoto protocols because the USA economy will be hard hit (avoiding pain) even though it will help destroy the environment (creating pain)) than any inherent stupidity of the person himself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sinungaling](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/838e76/32.png) [@Sinungaling](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sinungaling)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2003, 3:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762/29 "2003-12-15T03:01:31Z")

</div>

Per your Bush comment, people almost always pick the short term over the long term, especially when acting in concert.

And one can argue that it’s remarkably stupid to sail west based on vague rumours of spices, or use a vehicle that kills millions of people annually, or eat potentially dangerous foodstuffs, and so on. Which is to say that recklessness (a.k.a stupidity) usually hurts the reckless one, but occassionally pays off every now and then.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![prisoner6655321](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/5f8ce5/32.png) [@prisoner6655321](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/prisoner6655321)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2003, 4:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762/30 "2003-12-15T04:46:05Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Markxxx \*  
> **I find it odd how people equate achievement with knowledge.**

I find it odd how people equate _knowledge_ with intelligence. Not the same thing bub.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![David\_Simmons](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/9de053/32.png) [@David\_Simmons](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/David_Simmons)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2003, 5:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762/31 "2003-12-15T05:39:18Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by prisoner6655321 \*  
> \*\*I find it odd how people equate _knowledge_ with intelligence. Not the same thing bub. \*\*

That’s true, but I think the really intelligent realize that it is a good idea to have as much knowledge as possible so that you don’t have to reinvent everything from scratch for yourself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![engineer\_comp\_geek](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/engineer_comp_geek/32/504_2.png) [@engineer\_comp\_geek](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/engineer_comp_geek)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2003, 5:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762/32 "2003-12-15T17:56:50Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> _Originally posted by boofy\_bloke \*  
> \*\*  
> How is it that after 10 million years of evolution we have people of such stupidity that they will hold a lit firecracker in their hand to see what happens when it goes off?_\*

Once again you are assuming that evolution is moving towards soemthing. Evolution isn’t about a final goal, it’s simply changing things. There’s no reason to assume that we’ll be any smarter 10 million years from now. In fact, there’s no reason to assume that we’ll even be around 10 million years from now. Thus far, the most successful creatures on the earth have been amazingly stupid. Also, human beings who are dumb as mud are quite rare, otherwise the darwin award list would be a lot longer than it is.

Part of what you are calling “stupidity” is in fact a natural curiosity about how things work and asking “what happens if…” Although it leads to some things that really make you wonder sometimes (like alternative uses of vacuum cleaners) it’s also the same trait that got us to the moon and back.

A cockroach isn’t going to ask “what happens if…” but evolution isn’t trying to create the ultimate creature. Evolution is all about successfully interacting with your environment. I think you’ve fallen into the trap of believing that we are better than cockroaches because we are somehow more evolved. Historically, though. cockroaches have a better track record for success than humans so far. There’s no reason to believe that Einstein is better for our long term survival than the ditz at the local quickie mart that couldn’t even make change for a buck when the computer went down.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2003, 7:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762/33 "2003-12-15T19:49:59Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> How is it that after 10 million years of evolution we have people of such stupidity that they will hold a lit firecracker in their hand to see what happens when it goes off? Or use a vacuum cleaner to simulate fellatio?

Evolution does not equal “smarter” or “better,” no matter your definition of smart or good. Evolution simply means “adapted” or “not maladapted.”

As was pointed out above, what you consider smart might result in the human race destroying the ecosystem on which the species depends. Whereas one guy who uses a vacuum cleaner in the way you describe is not necessarily jeopardising his own survival or the survival of his offspring.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cher3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/da6949/32.png) [@cher3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cher3)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2003, 8:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762/34 "2003-12-15T20:30:27Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Darwin’s Finch \*  
> \*\*That’s “The _Mis_measure of Man”. It was written as a direct counterargument to Herrnstein’s and Murray’s “The Bell Curve” which advocated genetic determinism in intelligence. \*\*

I just wanted to mention that _The Mismeasure of Man_ was written considerably before _The Bell Curve_, but Gould produced a revised edition because the latter was trotting out the same old misconceptions for a broad new audience.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![filmore](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/7993a0/32.png) [@filmore](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/filmore)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2003, 8:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762/35 "2003-12-15T20:38:10Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Hari Seldon \*  
> \*\*  
> Just remember that fully 50% of the human population is below average.
> 
> \*\*

Actually, I think it’s that 50% of the human population is below the mean. The average does not always correspond to the midpoint.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![muttrox](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a8b319/32.png) [@muttrox](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/muttrox)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2003, 9:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762/36 "2003-12-15T21:57:29Z")

</div>

Filmore, you mean median, not mean.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cervaise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cervaise/32/16693_2.png) [@Cervaise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cervaise)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2003, 10:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762/37 "2003-12-15T22:27:45Z")

</div>

So the short answer to the OP, then, is that you don’t have to be smart to fuck?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ryan\_Liam](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ryan_liam/32/3965_2.png) [@Ryan\_Liam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ryan_Liam)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2003, 11:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762/38 "2003-12-15T23:18:35Z")

</div>

stupid people need to be around to do jobs that smart people create, not all Indians can be chief.

Smart people and in some cases, strong people are there to control the masses, but that may not be the case anymore.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darwins\_Finch](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darwins_finch/32/20304_2.png) [@Darwins\_Finch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darwins_Finch)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2003, 11:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762/39 "2003-12-15T23:27:44Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by acsenray \*  
> **Evolution simply means “adapted” or "not maladapted."**

Evolution just means “changing” (literally, it just means “unfolding”…), specifically the changing of a population’s genotype over time. Evolution can occur without adaptation (see: genetic drift).

> [@](#):
>
> _Originally posted by cher3_  
> **I just wanted to mention that _The Mismeasure of Man_ was written considerably before _The Bell Curve_, but Gould produced a revised edition because the latter was trotting out the same old misconceptions for a broad new audience.**

Quite correct; my mistake. Gould’s book originally predated the latter by about 13 years. How about, “it was written as a prescient counterargument to _The Bell Curve_?” 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![prisoner6655321](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/5f8ce5/32.png) [@prisoner6655321](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/prisoner6655321)\
**Post date:** [December 16, 2003, 12:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762/40 "2003-12-16T00:26:59Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> _Originally posted by engineer\_comp\_geek  
> Part of what you are calling “stupidity” is in fact a natural curiosity about how things work and asking “what happens if…” Although it leads to some things that really make you wonder sometimes (like alternative uses of vacuum cleaners) it’s also the same trait that got us to the moon and back._

Was it stupid for Ben Franklin to fly a kite in a thunderstorm? Yep. But are we glad he did.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-darwinian-explanation-for-stupid-people/218762.md?page=3)
