# What is the lowest number NOT found on Google?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [September 12, 2004, 1:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132 "2004-09-12T13:38:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mkl12](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b4bc9f/32.png) [@mkl12](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mkl12)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2004, 3:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132/21 "2004-09-13T15:08:00Z")

</div>

15274346

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Drew\_Blade](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/958977/32.png) [@Drew\_Blade](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Drew_Blade)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2004, 11:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132/22 "2004-09-13T23:28:31Z")

</div>

> [@mkl12](#):
>
> 15274346

Um **mkl12** , I get 5 hits for your number. Is it posted correctly?

Google search preferences could affect results (those infamous math porn sites 🙂 ). For what it’s worth I use “Search for pages written in any language” and “Do not filter my search results.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mkl12](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b4bc9f/32.png) [@mkl12](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mkl12)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2004, 12:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132/23 "2004-09-14T00:34:31Z")

</div>

> [@Drew Blade](#):
>
> Um **mkl12** , I get 5 hits for your number. Is it posted correctly?
> 
> Google search preferences could affect results (those infamous math porn sites 🙂 ). For what it’s worth I use “Search for pages written in any language” and “Do not filter my search results.”

Now I get 5 hits for that number, too. I think I’ve copied a later attempt. :mad: The number I found must be close to that, only one or two digits changed, but I can’t find it now. Can I still say I’ve won the game? 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mkl12](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b4bc9f/32.png) [@mkl12](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mkl12)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2004, 12:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132/24 "2004-09-14T00:40:19Z")

</div>

Here’s a slightly larger one.

15377447

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Drew\_Blade](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/958977/32.png) [@Drew\_Blade](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Drew_Blade)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2004, 1:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132/25 "2004-09-14T01:25:03Z")

</div>

> [@mkl12](#):
>
> Can I still say I’ve won the game? 🙂

Well you’re certainly the leader, but I’m still looking for a new low.

Are you mostly just searching for numbers that pop into your head, or do you have a logic? One of the sites in the OP mentioned writing a script to help the search. That is well beyond my current level of knowledge, but sounds promising in order to find the really lowest number.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Drew\_Blade](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/958977/32.png) [@Drew\_Blade](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Drew_Blade)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2004, 2:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132/26 "2004-09-14T14:16:38Z")

</div>

OK. I’ve reached a new low.

15357219

Something called ncbi seems to have used every number under 15357213. Well, ok, I can’t prove they used them all, but it sure seems it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Drew\_Blade](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/958977/32.png) [@Drew\_Blade](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Drew_Blade)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2004, 3:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132/27 "2004-09-14T15:14:55Z")

</div>

Oops–

I just found a lower one within the territory I thought ncbi had covered up.

15357171

The elusive prey is still afoot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mkl12](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b4bc9f/32.png) [@mkl12](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mkl12)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2004, 4:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132/28 "2004-09-14T16:50:12Z")

</div>

15344130

Ncbi is almost everywhere. Almost.  
I found this by randomly changing the numbers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colophon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f05b48/32.png) [@Colophon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colophon)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2004, 3:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132/29 "2004-09-16T15:51:12Z")

</div>

Beat you by a few more:

15344109

and even better:

15344087

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colophon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f05b48/32.png) [@Colophon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colophon)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2004, 4:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132/30 "2004-09-16T16:07:52Z")

</div>

I’ve also found a window in the NCBI results, a _lot_ below those… sadly other sites are filling them at the moment… found plenty with only 2 or 3 results.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Drew\_Blade](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/958977/32.png) [@Drew\_Blade](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Drew_Blade)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2004, 9:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132/31 "2004-09-18T21:02:12Z")

</div>

**Colophon** ,15344087 now gives one hit. I saw it with no hits earlier. I sometimes wonder how reliable Google hit counts are.

It sure is hard to hit a changing/moving target!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Drew\_Blade](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/958977/32.png) [@Drew\_Blade](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Drew_Blade)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2004, 9:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132/32 "2004-09-18T21:08:12Z")

</div>

Right now this number is a no hitter. Better not blink or it will go away.

15343990

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Drew\_Blade](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/958977/32.png) [@Drew\_Blade](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Drew_Blade)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2004, 9:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132/33 "2004-09-18T21:10:38Z")

</div>

15343955

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Drew\_Blade](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/958977/32.png) [@Drew\_Blade](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Drew_Blade)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2004, 9:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132/34 "2004-09-18T21:15:21Z")

</div>

Here’s a little jump ahead.

15323857

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![citrus\_x\_paradisi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6f9a4e/32.png) [@citrus\_x\_paradisi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/citrus_x_paradisi)\
**Post date:** [September 18, 2004, 11:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132/35 "2004-09-18T23:48:47Z")

</div>

[This page](http://1943544563.0x800ccc0d.com/3717672303) alone seems to have knocked many numbers out of the running. ☹

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Drew\_Blade](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/958977/32.png) [@Drew\_Blade](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Drew_Blade)\
**Post date:** [September 19, 2004, 12:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132/36 "2004-09-19T00:01:55Z")

</div>

> [@citrus x paradisi](#):
>
> [This page](http://1943544563.0x800ccc0d.com/3717672303) alone seems to have knocked many numbers out of the running. ☹

Yeah, but pages like that and the infamous ncbi are part of the game. At any instant there is still a lowest missing number, and it would be fun to identify the lowest one–but I’m not suggesting that people NOT publish their normal pages, however questionable it looks to us (as in, what was the page you found doing that matters? I sure don’t know.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Drew\_Blade](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/958977/32.png) [@Drew\_Blade](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Drew_Blade)\
**Post date:** [September 19, 2004, 1:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132/37 "2004-09-19T01:32:04Z")

</div>

Last one tonight:

15323436

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![spinky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/59ef9b/32.png) [@spinky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/spinky)\
**Post date:** [September 19, 2004, 9:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132/38 "2004-09-19T21:18:05Z")

</div>

My [script](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=276262) got this one:

10349265

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![spinky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/59ef9b/32.png) [@spinky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/spinky)\
**Post date:** [September 19, 2004, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132/39 "2004-09-19T22:54:59Z")

</div>

…and mere hours later it’s gone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Drew\_Blade](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/958977/32.png) [@Drew\_Blade](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Drew_Blade)\
**Post date:** [September 20, 2004, 12:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132/40 "2004-09-20T00:16:01Z")

</div>

> [@ntucker](#):
>
> …and mere hours later it’s gone.

Your find got gobbled by the dread ncbi monster. It happens to the best of us. Too bad, as that was a really low low.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-lowest-number-not-found-on-google/264132.md?page=3)
