# What is the most Libertarian country in the world?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [March 6, 2010, 4:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533 "2010-03-06T16:33:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panache45](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/panache45/32/64_2.png) [@panache45](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panache45)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2010, 8:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533/21 "2010-03-06T20:32:40Z")

</div>

> [@superluser](#):
>
> By helping the poor, we encourage the social trait of poverty, which propagates not through heredity, but in much the same was as a meme. This sounds very much like every Objectivist I’ve ever heard.

Objectivists don’t recognize any “social trait of poverty.” I can’t imagine an Objectivist refusing to help someone out for that reason (there may, however, be other reasons).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![superluser](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/58956e/32.png) [@superluser](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/superluser)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2010, 8:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533/22 "2010-03-06T20:33:41Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> So what’s the difference between a government that exercises no power, and one which doesn’t exist at all? Libertarianism is often associated with the quote “that government governs the best which governs least”, and the government of Somalia certainly governs least.

Even the Libertarians who want virtually no government recognize the need to prosecute murders and other violent crimes. If you meet a Libertarian who says that there should be no police, kindly ask him what the difference between that and anarchy is.

Yes, I am aware that there are crazies who suggest privatizing the police. I don’t think that’s a mainstream Libertarian belief.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![superluser](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/58956e/32.png) [@superluser](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/superluser)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2010, 8:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533/23 "2010-03-06T20:36:50Z")

</div>

> [@panache45](#):
>
> This is just plain wrong. There is nothing in the Objectivist ethics that prohibits charity, so long as you can afford it and the recipient deserves it. And of course it must be voluntary, not taken from you by force.

Here’s what Ayn Rand said about altruism. I can’t view it right now for a few reasons, but it should settle the issue: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viGkAZR-x8s](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viGkAZR-x8s)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2010, 8:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533/24 "2010-03-06T20:42:25Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> So what’s the difference between a government that exercises no power, and one which doesn’t exist at all? Libertarianism is often associated with the quote “that government governs the best which governs least”, and the government of Somalia certainly governs least.

Bad analogy. It’s like looking at two guys, one who eats 5,000 cal/day and one who eats 0 cal/day and saying that the guy who eats 0 cal/day is closer to following the recommended amount of cal/day. It’s not a linear function.

If you don’t have the bare bones of a civil society, you’re not even in the running. Perhaps it was my mistake to introduce the term “anarchy” in to this discussion, because, except at very low population densities, you never really have anarchy-- you have “thugocracy”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2010, 8:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533/25 "2010-03-06T20:45:49Z")

</div>

> [@superluser](#):
>
> Here’s what Ayn Rand said about altruism. I can’t view it right now for a few reasons, but it should settle the issue: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viGkAZR-x8s](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viGkAZR-x8s)

Altruism is “selfless concern for the welfare of others”. That’s not the same thing as charity. Re-read the conditions \*\*panache \*\*put on charity, and that is not altruism.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2010, 9:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533/26 "2010-03-06T21:45:20Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> The libertarian position is that the role of government should be limited to protecting fundamental rights, including the right to property, free speech, religion, and so forth. An anarchist failed state certainly doesn’t meet that definition.

Most people hold that the role of government should be limited to protecting fundamental rights. The difference between folks’ views is usually a disagreement over what those fundamental rights are.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bayesian\_Empirimancer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/6de8d8/32.png) [@Bayesian\_Empirimancer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bayesian_Empirimancer)\
**Post date:** [March 6, 2010, 10:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533/27 "2010-03-06T22:17:01Z")

</div>

I can’t believe we’re 26 posts in, and no mention of Robert Nozick! While I’m not going to contribute to the OP that much as to what countries. Afterall, I am in the Mid-West, and I am fairly geographically disinclined. But I do have some sources that may or may not help clear up the issue at hand:

[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/libertarianism/](http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/libertarianism/)

[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/contractarianism-contemporary/](http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/contractarianism-contemporary/)

[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/coercion/](http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/coercion/)

[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/property/](http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/property/)

[http://www.lp.org/](http://www.lp.org/) \<— Libertarian Party website

> **[Robert Nozick](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Nozick)**
>
> Robert Nozick (/ˈnoʊzɪk/; November 16, 1938 – January 23, 2002) was an American philosopher. He held the Joseph Pellegrino University Professorship at Harvard University, and was president of the American Philosophical Association. He is best known for his books Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974), a libertarian answer to John Rawls' A Theory of Justice (1971), in which Nozick also presented his own theory of utopia as one in which people can freely choose the rules of the society they enter int

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![superluser](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/58956e/32.png) [@superluser](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/superluser)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2010, 5:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533/28 "2010-03-07T17:37:04Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> Altruism is “selfless concern for the welfare of others”. That’s not the same thing as charity. Re-read the conditions \*\*panache \*\*put on charity, and that is not altruism.

All I can say is that the objectivists I’ve seen hate the concept of helping others.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrightNShiny](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7bcc69/32.png) [@BrightNShiny](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrightNShiny)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2010, 8:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533/29 "2010-03-07T20:06:23Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> Altruism is “selfless concern for the welfare of others”. That’s not the same thing as charity. Re-read the conditions \*\*panache \*\*put on charity, and that is not altruism.

I watched the video, and she’s not just talking about government-required or subsidized giving (although she does touch on that). She considers it immoral for anyone not to act in their own self-interest. Further, from her discussion on love, I take away that she feels that giving should be based on the recipient’s “virtue” (“virtue,” I assume, being defined by the donor).

So, from that, I take away that she would be okay with something like a patron supporting an artist, since that support is based on the artist’s virtue. But she would consider undifferentiated charitable giving to be immoral, which would include things like soup kitchens or free clinics. Even if they were completely supported by private donations, she would find it immoral to donate to such a place, because a donor would not be acting in his self-interest in making such a donation.

I’ll just address an obvious rejoinder to the above: what if the donor gets good-feelings inside his tummy from donating to the homeless shelter? Wouldn’t that be acting in his self-interest? Well, my take-away from the video is that she thinks that those tummy feelings are an artificial construction created by an incorrect morality, rather than the morality she is preaching. That, combined with her comments about churches and religion, make me think that should would also consider things like voluntary tithing to be immoral.

ETA: I don’t see any indication that she would outlaw undifferentiated charitable giving, merely that she finds it immoral.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panache45](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/panache45/32/64_2.png) [@panache45](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panache45)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2010, 9:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533/30 "2010-03-07T21:14:58Z")

</div>

> [@BrightNShiny](#):
>
> I’ll just address an obvious rejoinder to the above: what if the donor gets good-feelings inside his tummy from donating to the homeless shelter? Wouldn’t that be acting in his self-interest? Well, my take-away from the video is that she thinks that those tummy feelings are an artificial construction created by an incorrect morality, rather than the morality she is preaching.

And her rejoiner would be: What you are referring to is total subjectivism, not objectivism. Your good feelings are based on irrational values, rather than something that is objectively good. Wouldn’t a murderer “feel good” about destroying his victim? Wouldn’t a rapist “feel good” on a sexual high? Wouldn’t a politician “feel good” by accepting graft?

So don’t confuse “feeling good” with your self-interest. When a rational person engages in charity, it’s based on objective values, not on his own feelings. Giving a deserving kid a scholarshop; helping out a starving artist who creates beautiful sculpture; donating to the victims of an earthquake, who don’t deserve to suffer . . . provided you are doing so out of benevolence, not out of duty.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrightNShiny](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7bcc69/32.png) [@BrightNShiny](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrightNShiny)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2010, 9:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533/31 "2010-03-07T21:20:57Z")

</div>

> [@panache45](#):
>
> And her rejoiner would be: What you are referring to is total subjectivism, not objectivism. Your good feelings are based on irrational values, rather than something that is objectively good. Wouldn’t a murderer “feel good” about destroying his victim? Wouldn’t a rapist “feel good” on a sexual high? Wouldn’t a politician “feel good” by accepting graft?
> 
> So don’t confuse “feeling good” with your self-interest.

I didn’t. This is exactly what I stated. She doesn’t view “feeling good” as a self-interest, so it’s not a justification for charitable giving.

> [@](#):
>
> When a rational person engages in charity, it’s based on objective values, not on his own feelings. Giving a deserving kid a scholarshop; helping out a starving artist who creates beautiful sculpture;

This part I’m with you on, but this next part:

> [@](#):
>
> donating to the victims of an earthquake, who don’t deserve to suffer . . . provided you are doing so out of benevolence, not out of duty.

That’s not the way I read her video discussion. She would consider charitable giving out of “benevolence” to be immoral.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panache45](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/panache45/32/64_2.png) [@panache45](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panache45)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2010, 9:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533/32 "2010-03-07T21:41:44Z")

</div>

> [@BrightNShiny](#):
>
> That’s not the way I read her video discussion. She would consider charitable giving out of “benevolence” to be immoral.

Not at all. An objectivist would say, “There’s a human being like me, he’s suffering unjustly and I can empathize with him. I can afford to help him get back on his feet and become independent.”

An altruist would say, "There’s someone suffering, and I don’t care what kind of person he is or whether I can afford to help him. The mere fact of his suffering mandates that I help him, even if his situation never improves. It’s my duty, even if I hate doing it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrightNShiny](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7bcc69/32.png) [@BrightNShiny](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrightNShiny)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2010, 9:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533/33 "2010-03-07T21:44:29Z")

</div>

> [@panache45](#):
>
> Not at all. An objectivist would say, “There’s a human being like me, he’s suffering unjustly and I can empathize with him. I can afford to help him get back on his feet and become independent.”

Well, if you are getting this from other works of Rand, please cite, because this is completely counter to the viewpoint she presents in the video. There is no self-interest at play in the statement you have quoted above, and you seem to just be restating “feel-good tummy feelings” in another way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panache45](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/panache45/32/64_2.png) [@panache45](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panache45)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2010, 10:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533/34 "2010-03-07T22:13:11Z")

</div>

_"My views on charity are very simple. I do not consider it a major virtue and, above all, I do not consider it a moral duty. There is nothing wrong in helping other people, if and when they are worthy of the help and you can afford to help them. I regard charity as a marginal issue. What I am fighting is the idea that charity is a moral duty and a primary virtue._  
(from her \*Playboy \*interview, March 1964.)

And there are several instances in her novels of people helping others out . . . out of non-sacrificial benevolence and shared values.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrightNShiny](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7bcc69/32.png) [@BrightNShiny](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrightNShiny)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2010, 10:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533/35 "2010-03-07T22:17:07Z")

</div>

> [@panache45](#):
>
> _"My views on charity are very simple. I do not consider it a major virtue and, above all, I do not consider it a moral duty. There is nothing wrong in helping other people, if and when they are worthy of the help and you can afford to help them. I regard charity as a marginal issue. What I am fighting is the idea that charity is a moral duty and a primary virtue._  
> (from her \*Playboy \*interview, March 1964.)
> 
> And there are several instances in her novels of people helping others out . . . out of non-sacrificial benevolence and shared values.

Well, that definitely supports your position. But it contradicts her video. She seems not to have thought this issue through well, I guess.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HorseloverFat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/8e8cbc/32.png) [@HorseloverFat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HorseloverFat)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2010, 2:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533/36 "2010-03-08T02:42:04Z")

</div>

Weak central government, weak local government, rule of force, no market regulation, no public services? You’re looking at Somalia.

[http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/travel-and-living-abroad/travel-advice-by-country/country-profile/sub-saharan-africa/somalia](http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/travel-and-living-abroad/travel-advice-by-country/country-profile/sub-saharan-africa/somalia)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panache45](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/panache45/32/64_2.png) [@panache45](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panache45)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2010, 3:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533/37 "2010-03-08T03:07:31Z")

</div>

> [@BrightNShiny](#):
>
> Well, that definitely supports your position. But it contradicts her video. She seems not to have thought this issue through well, I guess.

[sarcasm]  
Right. Ayn Rand didn’t think very much about the issue of altruism.  
[/sarcasm]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrightNShiny](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7bcc69/32.png) [@BrightNShiny](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrightNShiny)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2010, 5:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533/38 "2010-03-08T05:13:58Z")

</div>

> [@panache45](#):
>
> [sarcasm]  
> Right. Ayn Rand didn’t think very much about the issue of altruism.  
> [/sarcasm]

You can be sarcastic all you want. She’s the one making conflicting statements.:rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panache45](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/panache45/32/64_2.png) [@panache45](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panache45)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2010, 5:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533/39 "2010-03-08T05:31:54Z")

</div>

> [@BrightNShiny](#):
>
> You can be sarcastic all you want. She’s the one making conflicting statements.:rolleyes:

Now it’s my turn: Cite?

I have reviewed the video. There is no contradiction. She is presenting the same philosophy that she wrote about for decades.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrightNShiny](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7bcc69/32.png) [@BrightNShiny](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrightNShiny)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2010, 5:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533/40 "2010-03-08T05:46:39Z")

</div>

Ok, let’s backtrack from the sniping, since my original questioning was an attempt to find out what she thought.

Here’s what I see you saying:

1. Morality is rooted in objective self-interest.

2. It is okay to donate to charity.

Now, you specifically mentioned earthquake relief, so let’s take that example. I don’t know anybody in Chile, I’ve never been to Chile, I have no business interests in Chile. There is no benefit to me for donating to Chile. If I donate money to Chilean earthquake relief, then I have not acted in my objective self-interest. All I get are good-tummy feelings, but if those aren’t relevant, then I have acted against my self-interest, since that money is no longer available to benefit me.

So, that’s where I see the contradiction. You seem to be saying that morality is rooted in self-interest, but at the same time, it’s okay to act against your self-interest (as in, it’s okay to act immorally). Please explain this apparent discrepancy (this is also the contradiction I’m seeing between the video and her Playboy interview).

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-the-most-libertarian-country-in-the-world/531533.md?page=3)
