Seems to me that it’s to declare the rights/responsibilities of the governed and to protect/enforce them. In a government leaning toward totalitarianism, it will tend to have fewer rights and more responsibilities for it’s citizens, and it will tend to use lots of force, or threat of force, to enforce them. In a government leaning toward libertarianism, it will likely have more rights and fewer responsibilities, but is also likely to do much less to enforce them. A modern democracy will tend to be somewhere in the middle, declaring a number of rights (speech, religion, etc.) and responsibilites (taxes, laws, etc.), and will use some force (imprisonment, fees, etc.).
A government should;
[ul]
[li]Maintain order and stability.[/li][li]Related to that, set and enforce safety standards.[/li][li]Help people who cannot help themselves.[/li][li]Protect people from unnecessary harm.[/li][li]Allow people to do whatever they want, unless it negatively impacts other people.[/li][/ul]
A lot of conservatives like Crafter_Man are still thinking in terms of the pre-industrial political philosophy of John Locke. Well, so were the Framers. But that dissonance shows an important point: The proper “primary function of government” is not timeless, but varies by the historical circumstances of the society it governs. E.g., the U.S. is a modern scientific-industrial state – not having public education would be unthinkable if we are to remain competitive in a global economy – therefore education is a proper primary function regardless of whether it can be fit into a “protection of individual freedoms” paradigm.
My response is that the function of government should be protection of individual liberty. That, of course, gets messy and complicated in the real world. However I still believe that the government should not exist to provide *things *to people but to provide the liberty needed so that individuals can create and use those things that they need/want.
In other words, each individual should be responsible for providing for their own life and the government should be responsible for protecting the liberty of each individual so that they can do so.
To me Governments function is to restrict the rights of people by punishment for a people who do not know the ways of Love. It’s the devil’s alternative to God.
To govern to the laws agreed via a democratic vote, ensure a strong economy and to supply those services that the market cannot or wont provide at a reasonable cost. protection from external parties is a role of government if that is what the populace wishes.
According to Madison, the proper function of govt is to protect the property/interests of the “opulent” minority from the depredations of the poor (much larger) majority. That exactly is what the Constitution provides for with enough “democracy” thrown in to make it reasonable with the masses.
It mostly worked fine while there was land/resources to steal from the indigenous Americans and anyone could become rich by moving West. Now, who has a chance but the CEOs and big investors who own the govt? Has the “common man” really ever had anything to say about our foreign and domestic policies?
I think the proper functions of govt should be to protect its citizens from coercion be it economic, physical or moral and assure and facilitate the equitable distribution of the country’s resources.