What is this musicial technique called?

Now I’m having flashbacks to one time when they decided to broadcast the Christmas concert over the intercom at work. One of the performances was someone who sang “Silent Night” like this, dragging out almost every damn note as if she was doing opera.

I was asking just this question when Aguilera burst onto the scene a few years ago. I thanked the lords of language that there was a word for it. Now I know what to complain about during American Idol. Hold a goddamn note, fer chrissakes!

Whee! I may have found my new user name!

Hmm…“Hi, I’m Nauseatingly Melismatic!”

Maybe not.

I agree that Whitney Houston’s version of this song is a melismatic abomination. I recommend listening to the original version sung by its author, one of the great American songwriters, Dolly Parton. It’s a beautiful song, with only minimal and appropriate melisma.

It does roll trippingly off the tongue, don’ it? Wonder how it would sound sung?? :wink:

I find that a lot of artists do this with Christmas songs these days. I figure it’s just to do “something different” or give the songs their own “style.” Personally, I hate it and it makes these nice songs too long and too overly dramatic.

Nauseatingly MelismaaaAAaaaAAAaaa[sub]aa[/sub]aaaa[sup]aaa[/sup]aaAAaaaa-<gasp>-aaaatic.

It’s called diarrhea of the vowels.

ExACTly!!

Even more annoying is the affectation of hand gestures following the gymnastics and the phantom-studio-ear-monitor-syndrome. It’s like they just walked into a spider web.

And, isn’t it quite different with ‘Angels We Have Heard on High’? I mean, aren’t those choirs trained to do some serious stuff with their throats, where as Beyonce is doing some silly stuff with her lips and tongue and jaw?

I mean when I watch Denyce Graves sing, I never see her lips wobbling all over the place. When her voice wavers, it is clear and strong, coming from her throat.

ETA: Gargoyle, I’m cracking up. You describe it perfectly.

:smiley:

I am the crudest of rock singers, but to my knowledge, all parts of the vocal system come into play based on where the singer is in their register, moving low to high - so Mariah’s warbling and choir melisma is produced vocally the same way (but that is my WAG based on my observations). I also believe that melisma, as a technique in the Western canon, first emerged in Gregorian Chants - as chants moved from single melody to complex harmonies, they also added melisma and other flourishes - as with any genre of music, that is part of the evolution - start off with a new style, codify the rules of the style, then add rococco flourishes and such…in this, choral singing moved through Gospel, where Aretha-style melisma, used for “spiritual punctuation” was innovated. But then it got a bit too over the top…

Huh! Now I know the “real” term for it. And all this time I’d privately coined the word “rococoboca”.

Consider me educated! Thanks.

There’s also the entirely separate line of influence, also via gospel and blues, leading back to African vocal traditions.

Thanks for including that; of course you are correct - once again leading to that great convergence within the Gospel tradition, which is the most direct progenitor to the R&B we are hearing today, replete with way too much melisma…

These two aspects of Melisma are so different, that I really wish there two separate words. One can be great, one is almost always unlistenable.

thwartme

Well, you need just a pinch of salt for great chocolate chip cookies, after all. But mix up the salt jar with the sugar jar and see how you like them cookies! :eek:

I’ve heard wonderful examples of the technique, but to use it well requires a lot more taste than most of the singers who use it possess. Usually it’s a cheap display of pyrotechnics that covers up weakness in real singing ability.

But a great example of it being used well, check out Kay Starr’s immortal “Wheel of Fortune”.