# What is this Viglink?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-this-viglink/696105>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [August 21, 2014, 4:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-this-viglink/696105 "2014-08-21T16:59:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 46

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rsa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/839c29/32.png) [@rsa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rsa)\
**Post date:** [September 10, 2014, 8:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-this-viglink/696105/46 "2014-09-10T20:45:14Z")

</div>

This is nuts. I’m confused and I know others are too. There are multiple ways to block viglink which may or may not work. There are multiple ad blockers; ADBLOCK, ADBLOCK PLUS and others & all are not supported on all browsers. After seeing this thread, I added [http://api.viglink.com](http://api.viglink.com) to javascript exceptions in Chrome to block. This seemed to fix some (most) of the problems / issues. Now, later, I get confused and go back to my javascript exceptions and my block says “allow”. Now knowing me, I probably did that myself. So I change it to block and I see the same links still being fixed. Then I tried adding [\*.][viglink.com](http://viglink.com) as another javascript exception to block. I still don’t see any difference, but by now I’m not sure what can and cannot be fixed.

I also found that viglink does not respect the “code” tag.

> [@What types of porn are people searching for? \[NSFW\]](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-types-of-porn-are-people-searching-for-nsfw/398542/1):
>
> So right when the AOL search data came out, I downloaded it at played around with it for about a week and then promptly forgot about it. One of the searches I remember doing was seeing how often people searched for “x porn” to get an idea of relative fetish frequencies.
> 
> Just tonight, I was chatting with a friend and remembered that a couple of fetishes seemed oddly high on the list so I decided to dig out the data again and rerun the analysis. What I found seemed quite odd given the consensus view on human sexuality:
> 
> Search for “porn” (fetish searches in bold):
> 
> ```auto
> 
> 12189 porn
> 7118 free porn
> 2972 porno
> 1481 porn.com
> 1457 freeporn
> 777 pornography
> 745 free porno
> 720 www.porn.com
> **709 teen porn**
> **691 gay porn**
> 583 free porn movies
> 535 sex.porn com
> 530 www.freeporn.com
> 529 pornstars
> **498 incest porn**
> **449 free gay porn**
> 399 freeporn.com
> 398 free porn pics
> **368 black porn**
> 358 porn stars
> 318 free porn videos
> 312 porn sites
> 309 www.porn
> **309 mature porn**
> 308 free porn sites
> **304 asian porn**
> **301 cartoon porn**
> **300 lesbian porn**
> **285 preteen porn**
> 285 porncity
> **281 teenporn**
> 276 porn videos
> 276 exits.freepornpics.com
> **264 porn queens**
> 260 free porn.com
> **257 disney porn**
> **251 anime porn**
> **242 adult porn**
> **236 rape porn**
> **230 animal porn**
> **229 free lesbian porn**
> **226 free teen porn**
> 
> ```
> 
> A search for “sex”
> 
> ```auto
> 
> 11426 sex
> 2107 sex positions
> 1740 sex toys
> 1698 free sex
> 1696 sex stories
> 1652 sex.com
> 1594 free sex stories
> **1327 animal sex**
> 1227 sexy girls
> 1221 www.sex.com
> 1166 sexual positions
> **1142 anal sex**
> 1127 worldsex.com
> 1110 sex offenders
> 1033 sexy swimwear
> 977 sexy
> **755 teen sex**
> **746 oral sex**
> 613 sexy women
> **606 world sex**
> **565 teensex**
> **559 animalsex**
> 
> ```
> 
> Now if you were to ask me before I ran this analysis what the most common fetishes were based on intuition, I would probably have said definitely teen and preteen, lesbian, maybe bondage, gay probably wouldn’t have surprised me. What I _totally_ wasn’t expecting was that incest and animal sex ranked right up there. It seems our entire societal expectation is that incest and bestiality have always been somewhat fringe activities but the AOL logs show a very different picture to what we are commonly told.
> 
> Just as a matter of interest, I ran the top 10 most common queries for gay, teen, incest and animal respectively:
> 
> ```auto
> 
> 1318 gay.com
> 954 gay
> 691 gay porn
> 459 free gay pics
> 451 gay sex
> 449 free gay porn
> 365 www.gay.com
> 291 gay men
> 246 gay pic
> 213 www.blkgaychat.com
> 
> 1829 preteen models
> 755 teen sex
> 744 naked teens
> 709 teen porn
> 615 nude teens
> 578 preteen
> 565 teensex
> 557 teen chat
> 546 teen pussy
> 497 teen models
> 
> 2071 incest
> 594 incest galleries
> 498 incest porn
> 485 incest stories
> 273 incesttaboo
> 249 incestart
> 189 incest pics
> 153 incest sex
> 148 free incest stories
> 140 prepubescent incest stories
> 
> 1327 animal sex
> 767 animals
> 559 animalsex
> 289 sex with animals
> 230 animal porn
> 203 animal planet
> 157 animal pictures
> 155 animal shelters
> 134 jaguar animal
> 131 animal kingdom
> 
> ```
> 
> It seems pretty clear that, as far as search volume goes, animal sex and incest possibly even exceed all other types of fetishes.
> 
> Of course, one alternative explanation is that there are only a few incest or bestiality lovers but they simply do more searches. I’m planning on running another batch of processing tonight to see the number of unique users for these search terms to see if that is the case.
> 
> But assuming it’s not, what the hell are the implications that arise from this? What if there were more people who were into bestiality than were gay? How does that affect the discussion on gay rights or what are acceptable sexual practices? Why does the gay lobby have so much power compared to the animal lovers lobby if they are comparable in size? Do these people remain in the closet due to the intense social stigma? It’s too late for me to even begin to think about what this means but I’d be interested in hearing what you all make of this.
> 
> PS: Just noticed that people seemed to expect that gay porn should be free but not incest porn as much… kinda funny

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-this-viglink/696105)._