# What is your ongoing opinion of the Affordable Care Act? (Title Edited)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [January 17, 2013, 11:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561 "2013-01-17T23:21:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 145

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 12:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561/2882 "2014-09-04T12:35:37Z")

</div>

That’s a poll, not a trend. What happened is that Democratic-aligned pollsters changed the question they were asking because they didn’t like the results of the old one: “Would you repeal or keep ACA?”, and replaced it with a new one: “Would you keep ACA as is, change it, or repeal it?”

As I keep saying, the first question is more reflective of political reality. Democrats have not put any changes to ACA into bill form and have no intention of doing so anytime soon. The choice for voters is the Democrats’ way(Keep it as is), or the Republicans’ way(repeal it).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobLibDem](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boblibdem/32/3149_2.png) [@BobLibDem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobLibDem)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 12:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561/2883 "2014-09-04T12:45:10Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> The choice for voters is the Democrats’ way(Keep it as is), or the Republicans’ way(repeal it).

You’re being too simplistic. Many Democrats freely admit that the law could be improved. The choice is between doing surgery to the law with a scalpel or with a chainsaw. Even if the choice is as you wish, between repeal or keep as is, how do you think the millions who now have insurance who didn’t before are going to vote?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 12:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561/2884 "2014-09-04T12:58:30Z")

</div>

They admit it, they just don’t have any plans, because the dirty little secret is that the changes voters want would probably damage the law. Such as keeping your insurance plan whether or not it meets ACA standards. So they stick to unspecified “changes”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Iggy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iggy/32/3364_2.png) [@Iggy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Iggy)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 1:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561/2885 "2014-09-04T13:26:04Z")

</div>

> [@Iggy](#):
>
> …  
> At least, the \*Halbig \*side argues, the administrations petition should be held in abeyance until we see if SCOTUS is going to take the \*King \*case. Not really such an unreasonable point, IMHO. Filing of the government’s response to the petition for cert in \*King \*is \*\*due by September 3, 2014 \*\*with a decision on whether to take the case soon to follow.)…

For anyone watching the _King_ case progress, the [administration was granted an extension](http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/09/delay-on-health-care-subsidies-case/) of one month to file its response to the petitioner’s request for cert to the Supreme Court. Response now due October 3, 2014.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 1:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561/2886 "2014-09-04T13:50:34Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> They admit it, they just don’t have any plans

The \*Democrats \*don’t have any plans? 😉 When are your guys going to come up with the Replace part?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 2:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561/2887 "2014-09-04T14:32:49Z")

</div>

> [@rsa](#):
>
> The CBO says there will be [30 to 33 million more non-elderly with health insurance in 2016 (pg. 2)](http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/03-13-Coverage%20Estimates.pdf) who wouldn’t have had it without the ACA.

Just for the fun of it, with ACA \*anybody \*can now get health insurance, and for a reasonable price too. If that isn’t a fair definition of universal coverage, it’s not far off.

Sad that the consistent 18% who want “repeal and replace” have not the faintest idea of what the replacement would _be_, other than that it wouldn’t have Obama’s name on it. That’s still less than the well-known 27% crazification factor, though, so perhaps we can dismiss them as being only a fraction of even the crazies?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 2:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561/2888 "2014-09-04T14:48:21Z")

</div>

The nonsense Halbig ruling has been withdrawn by the DC Court of Appeal. [According to this article](http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/09/04/3477801/breaking-federal-appeals-court-withdraws-decision-defunding-obamacare/), that means the Supreme Court is less likely to take up the issue. There will still be an en banc hearing where the full court is expected to overturn the original ruling. I look forward to the spin on this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 3:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561/2889 "2014-09-04T15:06:57Z")

</div>

I do love the way McConnell has been telling Kentuckians how wonderful the Kynect state exchange is, but he still wants to abolish Obamacare. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrumBum](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e79b87/32.png) [@DrumBum](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrumBum)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 3:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561/2890 "2014-09-04T15:32:24Z")

</div>

A new study from the [Urban Institute](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/no-obamacare-hasn-t-shifted-093000480.html) challenges the claim that ACA would cause employers to cut employee hours to escape the obligation to provide health care.

> [@](#):
>
> As evidence, they note that the increase in part-time workers who put in more than 30 hours a week, the threshold defined by Obamacare, has been similar to that for workers who clock less than 30 hours.

The article does point out that this might change in the coming months as mandate comes in effect, but thus far things seem to be going well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![magellan01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@magellan01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/magellan01)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 3:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561/2891 "2014-09-04T15:39:12Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> What defense? He used hyperbole and he probably shouldn’t have. This kind of minor nit doesn’t deserve more than a sentence or two of discussion.

If you think him _repeatedly_ assuring the people that they can keep their coverage, their health plan, and their doctor is hyperbole, you have zero idea what the word means.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 3:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561/2892 "2014-09-04T15:48:10Z")

</div>

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> If you think him _repeatedly_ assuring the people that they can keep their coverage, their health plan, and their doctor is hyperbole, you have zero idea what the word means.

Wasn’t talking about that. Read the thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 4:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561/2893 "2014-09-04T16:16:15Z")

</div>

> [@ElvisL1ves](#):
>
> Just for the fun of it, with ACA \*anybody \*can now get health insurance, and for a reasonable price too. If that isn’t a fair definition of universal coverage, it’s not far off.
> 
> ?

This I strongly agree with. It’s universal coverage by American standards: everyone who wants it can get it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 4:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561/2894 "2014-09-04T16:20:48Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> Wasn’t talking about that. Read the thread.

Defining universal coverage three different ways to clearly mean 100% covered and calling it “covering everyone” isn’t hyperbole. Hyperbole is “Our health care system is the best in the world!” Hyperbole by its nature sounds like BS but you can’t definitely prove it’s BS because you don’t know by what metric the speaker is calling it the best in the world. Saying something covers everyone when it doesn’t is just lying. Or being ignorant. So is telling people they can keep their insurance if they like it.

Besides, in the latter case, if it was just hyperbole, it wouldn’t a) be contrary to the very purpose of the law, and b) they wouldn’t have responded to the cancellations by letting as many people as possible keep their insurance. If they had really wanted everyone to keep their insurance, the administration had the power to write the regulations to allow 100% grandfathering. Instead, they wrote it so even fairly minor changes caused a plan to lose its grandfathering status. Unless the President is again ignorant of what goes on in his administration and gave no guidance on how to implement his signature legislative achievement, the President intentionally made it hard to keep your plan. So when the backlash occurred, the backtrack occurred.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 4:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561/2895 "2014-09-04T16:22:50Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> This I strongly agree with. It’s universal coverage by American standards: everyone who wants it can get it.

Then why all of your foot-stomping, right above, about how ACA is \*not \*Universal Health Care and is therefore a failure?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 4:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561/2896 "2014-09-04T16:28:28Z")

</div>

Because while you and I think of it as “close enough”, it’s not really universal health coverage. “Universal” means everybody, and Obama specifically used the word “everyone” in reference to coverage.

But either way, it doesn’t matter. They spent all their political capital to get this and they’ll spend any political capital they build up over the next couple of decades just defending it. No red state Congressman or Senator is going to fall on their sword for the Democrats to try this again. Everyone was told that this was “universal coverage”, so why would Democrats in tough districts and states sacrifice their careers for “This time it’s really universal coverage, we mean it this time!”

Plus there’s simple inertia. In order to pass ACA, there had to be a “crisis” in health care. This crisis involved 80% of Americans being satisfied with their care. So let’s say 10 years from now, 90% are satisfied. Where’s the political momentum to spend more money, or risk people’s insurance? No one’s going to believe they’ll be able to keep their insurance a second time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 4:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561/2897 "2014-09-04T16:31:08Z")

</div>

I cannot imagine an alternate universe where that answered the question **ElvisL1ves** asked.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![magellan01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@magellan01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/magellan01)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 4:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561/2898 "2014-09-04T16:33:10Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> Wasn’t talking about that. Read the thread.

I did read the last few pages. I acknowledge there was a chance you were referring to something else, which is why I started my comment off with the “If you think…”. Since you evidently don’t think that, excellent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 4:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561/2899 "2014-09-04T16:33:32Z")

</div>

**adaher** : Obama deliberately lied because it’s not universal coverage.

**adaher** : It’s universal coverage by American standards.

Clear as mud.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 4:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561/2900 "2014-09-04T16:35:23Z")

</div>

How can I answer something I never said? I never said ACA was a failure because it wasn’t universal, because despite the President’s lies, it was never meant to be universal.

ACA is a failure because aside from failing to meet the goals it wasn’t designed to meet, it hasn’t met the goals it was designed to meet, except to expand coverage. Which is a no–brainer. Welfare expanded the welfare rolls, but few would call welfare “successful” compared to what Democrats wanted to accomplish with it. They believed it was possible to eliminate poverty in their lifetimes, and this was the way to do it. Instead, it entrenched poverty. But hey, it ameliorated it a little, so success! It’s easy to define success if all you’re doing is considering the number of people needing government assistance a sign of success.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2014, 4:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561/2901 "2014-09-04T16:35:54Z")

</div>

So, **adaher** , criticizing the President for saying the ACA was part of bringing the US to universal coverage, while at the same time saying yourself that the ACA is (by American standards) universal coverage, is… let’s be kind and say ‘very foolish’. That’s a very foolish and silly thing to be saying at the same time.

You don’t seem to be learning anything from these many, many free lessons that you are offered by kind and generous Dopers.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561.md?page=144)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-is-your-ongoing-opinion-of-the-affordable-care-act-title-edited/647561.md?page=146)
