# What Kind of Gun Should Rosa Parks Have Carried?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [June 11, 2013, 7:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708 "2013-06-11T07:14:37Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [June 11, 2013, 8:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708/21 "2013-06-11T20:58:05Z")

</div>

> [@Drunky\_Smurf](#):
>
> You just jizzed all over yourself when you wrote that didn’t you? Pervert.

Just pointing out historical reality. The Right was terrified of armed black people. Still are, really. Bigots and hypocrites.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Damuri\_Ajashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/898d66/32.png) [@Damuri\_Ajashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Damuri_Ajashi)\
**Post date:** [June 11, 2013, 9:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708/22 "2013-06-11T21:43:08Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> ETA: As a declared anti-Second Amendment guy, I have to say I am embarrassed to have the OP, and the rest of the responders to this thread so far, on my side.

I am on the other side of the debate and I think we have both spent a lot of time being embarassed these past several months. I’d like to think that you have more cause for embarassment than me (at least wrt SDMB) but I think that is largely because the only conservatives left are generally above average or incredibly stubborn. I also think the pro-gun politicians are not as ignorant (on average, not stupid, just ignorant) as the anti-gun politicians.

> [@Ludovic](#):
>
> I don’t believe the point was that they were illegal but that the laws were unconstitutional limitations on freedom (at least as it was later found by the courts in many situations.)

Segregation was found constitutional in 1896 and segregation was only found unconstitutional for public school in 1954. It took the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to actually end segregation. The courts might have eventually determined that segregation at the Woolworth’s lunch counter was unconstitutional but its hard to see how they would have gotten there.

> [@](#):
>
> The argument of many fervent pro-2nd amendment types is that the 2nd amendment protects the others. I believe the OP is asking how the second amendment could have protected the others in the situations addressed in the OP. Because liberties were not protected in those cases, so the OP is wondering how the “2nd amendment protection” could have been utilized.

I think someone said that once or twice on this board but never as a primary argument. You are arguing against a bumper sticker made of straw.

> [@bup](#):
>
> **John** , in fairness, Rush Limbaugh (and I think others) have claimed the civil rights movement would have been less violent had those in favor of civil rights been armed.

Rush Limbaugh is an idiot and he would argue the exact opposite if gun rights were a liberal issue. He doesn’t give a shit about our rights, he is partican. He supported governemnt surveillance during teh bush administration but when Obama does it its proof that tyranny is right around the corner.

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> 1950s Alabama doesn’t count as a tyranny for its African American citizens?

No, its the ugly side of democracy. All democracy is rife for tyranny of the majority. All representative government is rife for tyranny of the minority and corruption. Our constitution does a pretty good job of minimizing these things.

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> Just pointing out historical reality. The Right was terrified of armed black people. Still are, really. Bigots and hypocrites.

I think your side of the argument is making a mistake by making gun rights a partisan issue. Not every right wing conservative is a gun nut and a lot of gun nuts are liberals. Condoleeza Rice, however tarnished by her association with Bush may be, supports gun rights because they were effective in protecting her family from the KKK.

Maybe you want that small tent (the TEA party certainly seems to want a small Republican tent) but I think its a good way to lose control of government and hand the keys back to the Republicans.

God made men, Colonel Colt made them equal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jimmy\_Chitwood](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/f475e1/32.png) [@Jimmy\_Chitwood](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jimmy_Chitwood)\
**Post date:** [June 11, 2013, 10:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708/23 "2013-06-11T22:38:04Z")

</div>

> [@fumster](#):
>
> Should his fiancé bring a similar gun or would that be too matchy-matchy?

I have nothing to contribute. This was a terrific line in a fucking terrific OP.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marshmallow](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/df705f/32.png) [@marshmallow](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/marshmallow)\
**Post date:** [June 11, 2013, 10:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708/24 "2013-06-11T22:51:46Z")

</div>

To help desegregation along the national guard was deployed in a couple places. Does that count as a second amendment solution?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [June 11, 2013, 11:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708/25 "2013-06-11T23:19:24Z")

</div>

> [@AtomicDog](#):
>
> If Booth had missed his first shot, what kind of gun should Lincoln have used to return fire with?

A Gatling, obviously.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sitnam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Sitnam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sitnam)\
**Post date:** [June 11, 2013, 11:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708/26 "2013-06-11T23:29:28Z")

</div>

> [@marshmallow](#):
>
> To help desegregation along the national guard was deployed in a couple places. Does that count as a second amendment solution?

US Marshalls count as the Federal Government forcing it’s mandate over states rights. For the armed militia mentioned in the 2nd a better representation here would be the Klan.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [June 11, 2013, 11:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708/27 "2013-06-11T23:37:24Z")

</div>

See, they were just acting in defense of states’ rights. Just like the slavers, the Jim Crowers, the lynch mobs, and now the gutters of social programs were all acting in defense of states’ rights under something or other they thought they read in the Constitution. No, it wasn’t a pretext for anything else, that’s what all the bloodshed and pain was about. States’ rights.

What, you don’t believe it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TriPolar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tripolar/32/3008_2.png) [@TriPolar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TriPolar)\
**Post date:** [June 11, 2013, 11:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708/28 "2013-06-11T23:46:24Z")

</div>

I’ll go with a bazooka. Probably not quite right for the job, but people take you seriously when you have a bazooka.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2013, 12:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708/29 "2013-06-12T00:00:09Z")

</div>

> [@AtomicDog](#):
>
> If Booth had missed his first shot, what kind of gun should Lincoln have used to return fire with?

[This!](http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Lincoln%27s_repeater)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2013, 1:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708/30 "2013-06-12T01:49:58Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> 1950s Alabama doesn’t count as a tyranny for its African American citizens?

Arkansas, if we’re talking about Rosa Parks, but you tell us. Do you think it was a tyranny?

And if so, should blacks have taken up arms against bus drivers?

Let’s recall that Brutus killed Caesar, not some low ranking government employee.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2013, 2:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708/31 "2013-06-12T02:30:11Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> Arkansas, if we’re talking about Rosa Parks, but you tell us. Do you think it was a tyranny?

Yes.

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> And if so, should blacks have taken up arms against bus drivers?

No, it wouldn’t have worked.

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> Let’s recall that Brutus killed Caesar, not some low ranking government employee.

“Second Amendment solutions” are for killing and intimidating people who can’t fight back. You don’t kill the bus driver; you kill _Rosa Parks_ for getting “uppity” and not knowing her place. The Second Amendment is about thuggery in the modern day, regardless of what it was originally intended for.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2013, 2:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708/32 "2013-06-12T02:49:21Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> Arkansas, if we’re talking about Rosa Parks, but you tell us.

No, it was Alabama. Montgomery to be specific.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2013, 2:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708/33 "2013-06-12T02:54:21Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> Arkansas, if we’re talking about Rosa Parks, but you tell us.

First, I’ll tell you that if we’re talking about Rosa Parks, we’re talking about Alabama, not Arkansas. Are you thinking of [The Little Rock Nine](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Rock_Nine)?

> [@](#):
>
> Do you think it was a tyranny?

Of course it was a tyranny for black people. Are you kidding?

> [@](#):
>
> And if so, should blacks have taken up arms against bus drivers?

Of course not. I’m not advocating taking up guns against tyrants, though. This whole thing is obviously a mockery of the insane “second amendment solutions” idiots, and trying to say that it’s not analogous because the 1950s weren’t a tyranny is entirely missing the point. They were far more of a tyranny than the current decade is for Tea Party folks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Measure\_for\_Measure](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/measure_for_measure/32/557_2.png) [@Measure\_for\_Measure](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Measure_for_Measure)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2013, 3:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708/34 "2013-06-12T03:24:34Z")

</div>

> [@monstro](#):
>
> It seems to me that most of the people who can’t stop talking about their precious 2nd Amendment rights would have been afraid of the Black Panthers for appreciating their own.

> [@Der\_Trihs](#):
>
> They were. _Terrified_ in fact.

Cite1: [http://www.theroot.com/views/fear-black-gun-owner](http://www.theroot.com/views/fear-black-gun-owner)

> [@](#):
>
> Then Gov. Ronald Reagan, now lauded as the patron saint of modern conservatism, told reporters in California that he saw “no reason why on the street today a citizen should be carrying loaded weapons.” Reagan claimed that the Mulford Act, as it became known, “would work no hardship on the honest citizen.” The NRA actually helped craft similar legislation in states across the country.

Cite2: [The Secret History of Guns - The Atlantic](http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/09/the-secret-history-of-guns/308608/?single_page=true)

> [@](#):
>
> Republicans in California eagerly supported increased gun control. Governor Reagan told reporters that afternoon that he saw “no reason why on the street today a citizen should be carrying loaded weapons.” He called guns a “ridiculous way to solve problems that have to be solved among people of good will.” In a later press conference, Reagan said he didn’t “know of any sportsman who leaves his home with a gun to go out into the field to hunt or for target shooting who carries that gun loaded.” The Mulford Act, he said, “would work no hardship on the honest citizen.”

The last article also details the sort of gun controls advocated by the NRA during the 1930s, back when it was a sportsman’s group rather than a collection of loons, gulls and swallows.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sophistry\_and\_Illusion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b3f665/32.png) [@Sophistry\_and\_Illusion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sophistry_and_Illusion)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2013, 4:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708/35 "2013-06-12T04:53:28Z")

</div>

> [@bup](#):
>
> **John** , in fairness, Rush Limbaugh (and I think others) have claimed the civil rights movement would have been less violent had those in favor of civil rights been armed.

Another Limbaugh fantasy. When civil rights protesters tried to arm themselves (see: Black Panthers in California), [legislation was specifically passed](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulford_Act) to strip from them the right to arm themselves, and this legislation was supported by the NRA at the time and such later luminaries of the right as Ronald Reagan. Guns weren’t a means of achieving liberty; they were just another liberty denied (and another means of oppression by those in power).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2013, 5:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708/36 "2013-06-12T05:03:02Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> Of course it was a tyranny for black people. Are you kidding?

Is that your argument? “Of course”? I know we’re now in the Pit, so maybe that’s OK, but it’s not an argument that holds any water. Lay your case out, and let’s see if it stands up to scrutiny.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gatopescado](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gatopescado/32/5711_2.png) [@Gatopescado](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gatopescado)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2013, 5:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708/37 "2013-06-12T05:38:00Z")

</div>

A BAR (Browning Automatic Rifle).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fumster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/e9c0ed/32.png) [@fumster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/fumster)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2013, 5:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708/38 "2013-06-12T05:40:00Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> Is that your argument? “Of course”? I know we’re now in the Pit, so maybe that’s OK, but it’s not an argument that holds any water. Lay your case out, and let’s see if it stands up to scrutiny.

has it really been that long? Black people were prevented by law from using certain water fountains, bathrooms, swimming pools, and schools. There was abuse of power by elected officials to discourage black people from voting and the legal system was tilted against black people so that it was difficult for them to get a fair trial. Those who were convicted were often sentenced to work gangs that were essentially slavery by another name. You don’t think that can be characterized as tyranny?

Here is Websters first definition:

oppressive power; especially: oppressive power exerted by government

So once again I ask, what sort of gun should Rosa Parks have packed when she just wanted to sit in the front of the bus and what sort of guns should black mothers have carried when they wanted to register their children in school?

I’m surprised that we haven’t had a serious answer yet. There always seems to be a lively debate about what sort of firearms are appropriate for home defense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fumster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/e9c0ed/32.png) [@fumster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/fumster)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2013, 5:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708/39 "2013-06-12T05:43:17Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> When the US becomes a “tyranny”, then it’s time to talk.

The whole point of the 2nd amendment is that the people who have guns get to decide when there is tyranny.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Measure\_for\_Measure](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/measure_for_measure/32/557_2.png) [@Measure\_for\_Measure](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Measure_for_Measure)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2013, 5:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708/40 "2013-06-12T05:48:53Z")

</div>

Stopping African American majorities from voting and forming governments on the basis of the same is pretty much the definition of tyranny. Lynch friendly sham elected judges are but one manifestation of this. Admittedly all this was more toxic during the 1920s and 1930s, but Jim Crow wasn’t exactly limited to public accommodations even during the 1950s.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-kind-of-gun-should-rosa-parks-have-carried/660708.md?page=3)
