# What legal ramifications, if any, could come from this?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-legal-ramifications-if-any-could-come-from-this/976245>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [December 9, 2022, 7:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-legal-ramifications-if-any-could-come-from-this/976245 "2022-12-09T07:19:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 16\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dirtball](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dirtball/32/18772_2.png) [@dirtball](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dirtball)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2022, 2:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-legal-ramifications-if-any-could-come-from-this/976245/21 "2022-12-09T14:46:56Z")

</div>

What if Joe buys three or four other $200K houses for disadvantaged families, but ones who would probably be good neighbors? With $300 million after taxes, he can easily afford it, and now he has a pattern of helping (presumably) deserving families by giving them houses. One misfire? Hell, everyone falls victim to poor judgment every now and then.

ETA: Not that anyone actually _deserves_ to be given a house outright; that’s just how Joe puts it if he’s asked about it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johnny\_Bravo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnny_bravo/32/493_2.png) [@Johnny\_Bravo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_Bravo)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2022, 3:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-legal-ramifications-if-any-could-come-from-this/976245/22 "2022-12-09T15:04:53Z")

</div>

> [@Horatius](#):
>
> But if he’s smart, that trail could point _away_ from legal liability.

Of course. My view of the OP is:

1. Joe commits a crime, but
2. Joe is smart and leaves no evidence behind, so
3. Can Joe be held liable for the crime he’s committed?

The OP acknowledges #1 by specifying #2. So while it seems certain that Joe would be questioned about the sale, the only way he’s held liable is by actively fighting the hypothetical.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2022, 3:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-legal-ramifications-if-any-could-come-from-this/976245/23 "2022-12-09T15:37:14Z")

</div>

I think there is also the question as to whether or not what Joe did was illegal in the first place.

And, short of Joe explicitly making a condition of moving there that they had to harass their neighbors, I don’t think any crime is being committed.

Let’s say that Joe does all this, but, in the new environment, the family flourishes and becomes model neighbors and citizens. Do you still feel that Joe committed a crime?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johnny\_Bravo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnny_bravo/32/493_2.png) [@Johnny\_Bravo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_Bravo)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2022, 4:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-legal-ramifications-if-any-could-come-from-this/976245/24 "2022-12-09T16:20:59Z")

</div>

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> And, short of Joe explicitly making a condition of moving there that they had to harass their neighbors, I don’t think any crime is being committed.

Note that the OP doesn’t stop at “harassment,” but specifies that the Dogwhistles are “violent, thieving, brutal, crackhead criminals,” and further specifies that Joe’s wish is for them to “terrorize [the] neighborhood.” That’s not simple harassment.

I don’t think Joe needs to know the specific crimes that will be committed. If I come to you all wild-eyed and muttering about how “they’re going to get it” and you loan me a gun, a car, and some cash, does it matter that you didn’t know precisely what I had in mind if I go and do something terrible with your aid?

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> Let’s say that Joe does all this, but, in the new environment, the family flourishes and becomes model neighbors and citizens. Do you still feel that Joe committed a crime?

I think so, yes. From our position as omniscient narrators, we know Joe’s motive and state of mind. We know that he is purposefully orchestrating a scenario which will facilitate criminal activities. _Mens rea_ can be all but impossible to prove in court absent concrete action, but in this thread we don’t have to prove it. We know, categorically, that Joe is **acting with the intent to cause harm to life and property.** This seems to push him past the standard for gross negligence.

Let’s take a big pivot. Say I know of a barber named[Sweeney Todd.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweeney_Todd) I’ve heard a rumor that some of Sweeney Todd’s customers go missing and have put two and two together. I set up a charity to provide haircuts and shaves to the downtrodden in that neighborhood. My intent, kept secret and to myself, is the murder of these people.

I don’t force anybody to go to any particular barber. I don’t speak to anybody directly, and certainly not to the Barber of Fleet Street. But a number of ‘undesirables’ go missing.

Acknowledging that I am fully insulated from legal liability due to my cleverness, have I nevertheless committed a crime? What if none of them go missing? Are the concrete actions I’ve taken to turn homeless people into meat pies only a crime if I’m successful?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Just\_Asking\_Questions](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ba9def/32.png) [@Just\_Asking\_Questions](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Just_Asking_Questions)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2022, 4:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-legal-ramifications-if-any-could-come-from-this/976245/25 "2022-12-09T16:37:19Z")

</div>

You can ignore the “I sold my house for $10” part by making the sale say $250K or whatever, financed by yourself, and just never get paid. It has the added bonus of you looking like another victim. “Not only did the Dogwhistles turn that fine house into a meth lab and let the Hells Angels live there, they never paid me!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tired\_and\_Cranky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/a87d85/32.png) [@Tired\_and\_Cranky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tired_and_Cranky)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2022, 5:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-legal-ramifications-if-any-could-come-from-this/976245/26 "2022-12-09T17:24:21Z")

</div>

> [@Saint\_Cad](#):
>
> In fear of hijacking the hypothetical what if he rents for $1 per month? He is rich enough to fix any damage to keep the house legal so he doesn’t really care if they trash the house. If they move out in the night, he just rents to another set of nastiest neighbors ever.
> 
> Since he is still the owner and not the resident, does that change anything legally?

Yes. In general, landlords have an obligation not to allow unsafe conditions or illegal conduct on their property. The landlord could be forced to evict them.

> [@Johnny\_Bravo](#):
>
> The OP establishes that Joe has been smart enough to be quiet about this, but **also** that he has “done his homework” to find the absolute worst family possible.

And in the not hypothetical this is based on, the real person has already told pkbites his nefarious plan. You think he’s never going to brag to anyone about his brilliant lottery-fueled vengeance?

pkbites takes all the fun out of the hypothetical. In case of every crime or tort, the answer is always that the person is not guilty/liable if there is no evidence.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![echoreply](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/echoreply/32/3641_2.png) [@echoreply](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/echoreply)\
**Post date:** [December 9, 2022, 5:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-legal-ramifications-if-any-could-come-from-this/976245/27 "2022-12-09T17:59:17Z")

</div>

> [@Johnny\_Bravo](#):
>
> Joe commits a crime, but

What’s the crime, though?

What if the lottery win went the other way? Dogwhistle wins $250,000 in the lottery, and instead of smoking it decides to buy a house in a nice suburb. Joe is selling because he hates his neighbors and just wants to get out, and the Dogwhistles show up with a cash offer and no need for inspection (because they don’t know any better), so they’re the new owners. Maybe Joe is even pleased that these people are likely to make things real bad for the neighbors he hates.

What if Joe got several offers, but takes the one from Dogwhistle just because he thinks they’ll mess up the neighborhood?

Has the same crime been committed as in the original OP?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pkbites](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pkbites/32/204_2.png) [@pkbites](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pkbites)\
**Post date:** [December 10, 2022, 12:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-legal-ramifications-if-any-could-come-from-this/976245/28 "2022-12-10T00:23:23Z")

</div>

> [@Johnny\_Bravo](#):
>
> IANABCDEFGetc.
> 
> Joe’s intent (per the OP) is for crimes to be committed against his neighbors. Since he’s not taking an active role beyond helping establish the circumstances, that would seem to make him an accomplice rather than a member of a criminal conspiracy. Seems no different than loaning somebody a car or a gun so that they can rob a bank.
> 
> Anybody investigating crimes committed by the Dogwhistle family would immediately wonder how they came to live in this very nice neighborhood. They’d find the extremely suspicious record of the sale. Joe would be a person of interest. He and the Dogwhistles will be questioned about the circumstances surrounding the sale.
> 
> The OP establishes that Joe has been smart enough to be quiet about this, but **also** that he has “done his homework” to find the absolute worst family possible. That means a trail of some kind. It’s an open question as to whether he left enough to establish intent, but from our omniscient perspective, _mens rea_ seems obvious.

This one I’m dismissing.

Remember, I am a LEO. When sent to a call like this, unless I suspect these are home invaders or squatters how someone came to live in whatever housing doesn’t enter the equation. This is a middle class home in a middle class neighborhood, not Bel Aire.

Ever been to West Allis, Wisconsin, east of 60th Street? Middle class housing but I swear the show Shameless could have taken place there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gatopescado](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gatopescado/32/5711_2.png) [@Gatopescado](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gatopescado)\
**Post date:** [December 10, 2022, 1:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-legal-ramifications-if-any-could-come-from-this/976245/29 "2022-12-10T01:45:30Z")

</div>

Who cares? Joe can afford a better team of lawyers. Bleed the old asshole neighbors dry with legal fees on top of all the other inhumanity.

I’m taking notes, by the way. Now, just need to hit the lottery…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/qadgop_the_mercotan/32/83_2.png) [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qadgop_the_Mercotan)\
**Post date:** [December 10, 2022, 2:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-legal-ramifications-if-any-could-come-from-this/976245/30 "2022-12-10T02:31:12Z")

</div>

> [@pkbites](#):
>
> Ever been to West Allis, Wisconsin, east of 60th Street?

Ah, Stallis! I never lived there but I sure lived near there.

C’mere once and see a typical neighborhood there east of 60th.

[![](https://i.postimg.cc/1z30JPJt/west-allis.jpg) ](https://i.postimg.cc/1z30JPJt/west-allis.jpg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mixdenny](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mixdenny/32/2962_2.png) [@mixdenny](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mixdenny)\
**Post date:** [December 10, 2022, 7:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-legal-ramifications-if-any-could-come-from-this/976245/31 "2022-12-10T07:13:31Z")

</div>

I gotta tell yah, this could be the next Eddie Murphy movie.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pkbites](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pkbites/32/204_2.png) [@pkbites](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pkbites)\
**Post date:** [December 10, 2022, 12:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-legal-ramifications-if-any-could-come-from-this/976245/32 "2022-12-10T12:26:31Z")

</div>

Gotta tell you, “Joe” and I had some good laughs over his diabolical plans. He was so pissed at his neighbors.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [December 10, 2022, 12:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-legal-ramifications-if-any-could-come-from-this/976245/33 "2022-12-10T12:40:55Z")

</div>

Getting back on topic, I see zero way that someone who merely gives criminals a place to live, is in any legal way liable for any crimes they commit. That would lead to all kinds of legal absurdities.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TokyoBayer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tokyobayer/32/13989_2.png) [@TokyoBayer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TokyoBayer)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2022, 12:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-legal-ramifications-if-any-could-come-from-this/976245/34 "2022-12-12T12:48:19Z")

</div>

> [@pkbites](#):
>
> Assume Joe is smart enough to keep quiet about his intent, could he be held liable for whatever happens? What if one of the crackheads murders one of the neighbors? Is Joe on the hook? Isn’t Joe allowed to sell to whomever he wants?

IANAL, of course, but I don’t see what law Joe would be breaking. From [here](https://www.justia.com/criminal/offenses/inchoate-crimes/),

> [@](#):
>
> Inchoate crimes, also known as incomplete crimes, are acts taken toward committing a crime or acts that constitute indirect participation in a crime. Although these acts are not themselves crimes, they are illegal because they are conducted in furtherance of a crime, and society wishes to deter individuals from taking such steps. Three primary inchoate crimes are attempt, conspiracy, and aiding and abetting.

As long as Joe is smart enough to not tell his co-workers, who in turn post this on random message boards, then it would be really hard to prove anything.

I don’t know that even if his plan were to be discovered if it were to be considered a crime. He isn’t enticing the lowlifes to actually commit crime. All he is doing is giving them a place to live which is close to these people’s homes. If they go on to commit crimes, that doesn’t seem to be to rise to the level of aiding and abetting.

Now if he were to provide a list of times when the people weren’t in their homes, or who had how much cash hidden under their mattresses, that may be different.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2022, 4:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-legal-ramifications-if-any-could-come-from-this/976245/35 "2022-12-12T16:21:45Z")

</div>

IANA lawyer but was married to one for 30+ years.

For Joe to avoid being guilty of criminal conspiracy he’d have to be very careful to avoid saying anything to the lowlifes that even leans towards Joe wanting crimes to happen or against whom.

The act of selling the house to the lowlifes for a below-market price could certainly be argued to be the “overt act” required by many state statutes defining criminal conspiracy. Whether any particular judge or jury would buy that part is IMO unknowable.

So avoiding the other essential element of criminal conspiracy, namely forming & communicating a joint plan, is the circuit breaker Joe needs to ensure stays intact to ensure he’s gonna skate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidNRockies](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidnrockies/32/6279_2.png) [@DavidNRockies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DavidNRockies)\
**Post date:** [December 12, 2022, 4:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-legal-ramifications-if-any-could-come-from-this/976245/36 "2022-12-12T16:27:39Z")

</div>

Didn’t more or less the same thing happen to Palm Beach, Florida, when Trump bought Mar-A-Lago?

Can we learn anything from that?

😉

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-legal-ramifications-if-any-could-come-from-this/976245.md?page=1)
