# What movie "wins the Oscars"?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-movie-wins-the-oscars/743160>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [January 14, 2016, 7:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-movie-wins-the-oscars/743160 "2016-01-14T19:31:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![That\_Don\_Guy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/that_don_guy/32/538_2.png) [@That\_Don\_Guy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/That_Don_Guy)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2016, 7:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-movie-wins-the-oscars/743160/1 "2016-01-14T19:31:04Z")

</div>

The calls of “_Star Wars: The Force Awakens_ is nominated only in ‘technical’ categories” have started, which led me to think; how does everybody decide what movie “does the best” at the Oscars?

I am in the “all Oscars count the same in this regard” camp. A movie that wins just for, say, Leading Actor does not “do better” than one with awards for Makeup/Hairstyling, Costume Design, and Cinematography.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nema98](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/d2c977/32.png) [@Nema98](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nema98)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2016, 7:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-movie-wins-the-oscars/743160/2 "2016-01-14T19:35:28Z")

</div>

All Oscars count, so that’s what I voted for. My second choice would have been Best Picture, but All count.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malthus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/85f322/32.png) [@Malthus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Malthus)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2016, 7:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-movie-wins-the-oscars/743160/3 "2016-01-14T19:50:37Z")

</div>

To my mind, there is a spectrum. At the top is Best Picture. At the bottom, the purely technical awards. In between rank the others, in an order that is debatable (obviously “best leading actor” is more important than “best supporting actor”, but a lot of the hierarchy is otherwise debatable).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sir\_T-Cups](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ed655f/32.png) [@Sir\_T-Cups](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sir_T-Cups)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2016, 8:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/what-movie-wins-the-oscars/743160/4 "2016-01-14T20:01:00Z")

</div>

It’s a little more complicated than “the most awards”, but not by a whole lot.

The more diverse the awards the movie wins, the better the movie as a whole is. A Test:

Revenant takes Movie, Actor, Set Design, and Costumes

Martian takes Director, Supporting Acress, Script, Sound, Editing, Music and Cinemetography

Which is the better overall movie? Revenant is the “best one” but only one in a couple major categories and a couple minor ones. OTOH Martian won more awards overall even if they were smaller, but were more diverse? I would venture to say Martian is the better movie because it was recognized in more categories as a whole
