You start a thread, whether checking date or not. You’re a responsible SD GQ guy (sometimes), and you check OP info first to see his necessary info. The link died twice; so, both for me and the benefit of my brethren, I immediately went and scanned to see if a cx to a cite was posted, and skipped all the other verbiage, thinking (not really, but anyway): if any posters subsequent to OP had not checked the cite–which, BTW, was a courtesy to OP, since he said he went to the effort to create it–all these other posters would benefit from a proper cite, and moreover * cackling contempt * they, sorry bastards, were revealing themselves as totally unprepared for class. [As I have been, proudly citing in post #56 something in OP:smack::).)
And just think, pearls before swine (according to some–present company excepted) all I had missed was Braaiiiins!
Tis a problem. But I sheesh you back.
Now all somebody’s gotta do is revive that cite/URL, and it’s Night of the Living Dead.
You start a thread, whether checking date or not. You’re a responsible SD GQ guy (sometimes), and you check OP info first to see his necessary info. The link died twice; so, both for me and the benefit of my brethren, I immediately went and scanned to see if a cx to a cite was posted, and skipped all the other verbiage, thinking (not really, but anyway): if any posters subsequent to OP had not checked the cite–which, BTW, was a courtesy to OP, since he said he went to the effort to create it–all these other posters would benefit from a proper cite, and moreover * cackling contempt * they, sorry bastards, were revealing themselves as totally unprepared for class. [As I have been, proudly citing in post #56 something in OP:smack::).) Plus I got to make a Saigon-hooker reference to the movie.
And just think, pearls before swine (according to some–present company excepted) all I had missed was Braaiiiins!