What part of speech is "sex"?

Picking up a ruler ready to crack some knuckles…

The word ‘to,’ has many meanings. And, depending on the meaning be used, can be different parts of speech.

That’s right, a word can be more than one part of speech, depending on its usage. E.g., ‘snow’ is a noun in “The snow is white,” and a verb in “Will it snow heavily tonight?”

And so, ‘to’ can be a preposition, which is a word that links a noun (or a pronoun or a noun-phrase) to some other word. E.g…

The dog moved closer to the ball. – In this case, ‘to’ is linking ‘door’ to ‘moved’ (How moved? To the ball.) In this case, the preposition is modifying a verb, and thus it is an adverbial preposition.

Mr. Brady may be just another TV dad, but he’s a hero to me. – Link’s ‘me’ to ‘hero,’ and thus, and adjectival preposition.

But ‘to’ can also be part of a verbal phrase, sometimes being called an auxiliary verb. We use it in this way to show the infinitive form of the verb: to run, to snow, to laugh, to cry, to have sex.

And to make things more complicated, ‘to’ can be an adverb as in ‘run to and for,’ or, ‘the unconscious man came to.’

And, ‘to’ has become part of idiomatic phrases which can be parsed word by word, although, the idiom sometimes begs to be taken as an inseperable whole, as in, “Do I have to?” ‘Have to’ is idiomatic since ‘have’ and ‘to’ don’t make any sense by themselves nor would they seem to be able to combine to make the sense of ‘must.’

Peace.

Well explained, moriah! “To” in this case is an auxiliary verb betokening the infinitive, just as “will” is an auxiliary verb betokening the future – and has no more to do with the preposition “to” than the future “will” has to do with Last Will and Testament, free will, or the Triumph of the Will.

Granted that, unless you’re talking about whether or not some microorganism has sexual reproductive characteristics, “to have sex” will be synonymous with actual verbs: to screw, to copulate, the English cognate of ficken, and so on. But like “to do the dirty,” it’s an infinitive-plus-object construction.

[Total hijack]Hmmmm . . . That will take us way too far OT, but I can’t resist sharing this link . . .

SNL Transcripts: Alec Baldwin: 04/21/90: The Diner - SNL Transcripts Tonight[/total hijack]
:wink:

You should have quit while you were ahead, poly. “To” is not in any way, shape, form, or situation a verb, not even an auxiliary. To some grammarians, that “to” is still a preposition, and not part of the infinitive – but it’s a purely formal preposition and doesn’t make the infinitive into a prepositional phrase.

Where the hell did you get ‘door’ from… it’s not even in the example sentence! Are you high?

You meant:

…‘to’ is linking ‘ball’ to ‘moved’…

Next time, learn to preview your work before you post, you freaking dolt.