When all of the most plausible explanations have been ignored . . .
Wait . . .
I can’t help but notice you didn’t mention five.
Well played, sir. Well played. fnord
prefect
Sorry, I left out the “that they used to destroy the Towers” part of that story.
Godzilla really destroyed the towers (just ignore the fact that it’s really a single tower in Chicago and it’s the time not the date that’s 9-11).
Nope, it was revealed later by an intrepid kid reporter that Rodan and Mothra framed him!
Just in case anyone is tempted to take our OP-er seriously, I suggest checking out the threads he has started. Not a pretty sight.
A plane did hit the Pentagon, but only because the pilots were experiencing delayed vaccine reactions as part of a Big Pharma plot to depopulate Virginia.
If there’s that much bad acid going around, we’ve got much bigger problems. 
Which reminds me…don’t take the brown acid, man, it’s a bummer…
Have you driven a fnord lately?
In the trade centers 1 and 2, the planes clearly left imprints. The wings on each plane were clearly visible on all the videos and pictures on the web. In the pentagon, I can’t spot the imprints on any videos or pictures. The youtube below is a CNN reporter at the time of the incident said the roof collapsed only after 45mins after the supposed impact.
A Boeing 757 wingspan is roughly 38m (124feet). There were no broken windows and walls measuring about 124 ft. In the trade towers, everyone and I believe too that the impact of the planes created the fire so intense, steel melted and the towers both 110 stories collapsed. Here at the pentagon, there were pictures of file cabinet and even an open book on a pedestal, right next to the collapsed section. How bizzare? Why did officials confiscated all the videos around the pentagon and not release any. They released five frames from one camera after a French reporter claimed it was a truck bomb. The five frames did not definitively show 757 but more like a missile because one frame has white smoke trail. The pilotsfor911 website explained that aircraft on the ground does not produce white vapor, but only when they are at 30,000 feet. A rocket does produce white vapor trail. I’m sure we all see planes leaving white trails when they high above. There were no vapor trails leaving the planes in the airports or near ground level.
“Fighting ignorance since discovering that I may have been duped”
You were.
A plane, but it took off from a treadmill.
Regards,
Shodan
Aluminum is easy to bend and shape and lightweight so that I can comfortably wear.it on my head all day long. I refuse to believe it could damage a building.
Indeed he was, the video I linked to early does show photos of damage to the first and second floors that do match the width of the plane and wings.
Just as a preemptive strike. One has to point out that sites that push other ideas usually commit a basic fraud. They only show the damage to the second floor and other sections of the pentagon to mislead others into thinking that the size and shape of the damage does not match the passenger plane that did crash.
Why is this thread still open? Have the mods decided to wait for a vote in Congress? 
A plane is made of the lightest possible, affordable material that still allows it to fly. This is especially true of the wings. When a plane crashes into something, it does not punch out an outline like Wiley Coyote, but crumples into almost nothing. The body is more solid, the wings, less so. If it wasn’t made that way, it wouldn’t fly. All of the crashed planes in 9/11 made exactly the outlines that engineers and physicists expected them to make. It’s only ignorance (or perversity) that says otherwise.
It certainly can’t cause alzheimer’s.
Matters fuck all what it was made of. Build a 60 ton Nerf projectile and launch it at a building at 600 miles an hour and it’ll still do a lot of damage.